Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZNTL logo
ZNTL
PRAX logo
PRAX
ARVN logo
ARVN
FOLD logo
FOLD
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$251M
5Y Perf.-90.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.16B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$457M
5Y Perf.-63.7%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.-18.9%

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZNTL logoZNTL
PRAX logoPRAX
ARVN logoARVN
FOLD logoFOLD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$251M$7.16B$457M$4.55B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$89M$634M
Net Income (TTM)$-124M$-327M$-221M$-27M
Gross Margin97.4%87.9%
Operating Margin-279.3%5.2%
Forward P/E40.6x
Total Debt$40M$110K$9M$483M
Cash & Equiv.$36M$357M$143M$214M

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZNTL
PRAX
ARVN
FOLD
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Zentalis Pharmaceut… (ZNTL)1009.5-90.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%
Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN)10036.3-63.7%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)10081.1-18.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOLD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇FOLD emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

ZNTL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
  • 2.4% margin vs ARVN's -247.5%
  • +456.0% vs ARVN's -7.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth 53.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
Best for: growth exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.50
  • 147.3% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -40.5%
  • 20.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
  • Beta 0.50 vs ZNTL's 2.41
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOLD logoFOLD20.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsPRAX logoPRAX2.4% margin vs ARVN's -247.5%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.50 vs ZNTL's 2.41
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+456.0% vs ARVN's -7.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FOLD logoFOLD-3.2% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs -40.5%

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZNTLZentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$67M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ARVNArvinas, Inc.
FY 2025
License
100.0%$130M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFOLDLAGGINGZNTL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FOLD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $634M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.3% (FOLD) to -2.5% (ARVN). On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$89M$634M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$144M-$357M-$245M$40M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$124M-$327M-$221M-$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$126M-$283M-$257M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+97.4%+87.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.8%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%-4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.9%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-91.7%+23.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.4%+2.7%-178.9%-89.0%
FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$251M$7.2B$457M$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$254M$6.8B$323M$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.84x-18.40x-5.54x-164.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.74x7.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.17x6.36x1.06x16.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x
ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

FOLD delivers a -12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ZNTL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARVN scores 4/9 vs ZNTL's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-53.6%-43.0%-44.4%-12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-40.7%-40.2%-28.4%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.5%-65.0%-22.4%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.5%-49.3%-16.0%+5.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–91344
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.00x0.02x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$357M-$134M$269M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$36M$357M$143M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$40M$110,000$9M$483M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.00x
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $13,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $627 for ZNTL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +456.0% total return vs ARVN's -7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 158.5% vs ZNTL's -47.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+156.9%-13.4%-38.2%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+137.8%+456.0%-7.6%+136.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.4%+1628.1%-75.4%+11.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.7%-17.6%-91.3%+36.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.8%-40.5%-55.8%+147.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-47.4%+158.5%-37.3%+3.7%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZNTL's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x1.55x1.14x0.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.95$366.52$14.51$14.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$37.19$6.06$5.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.6%+67.7%+48.9%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.428.621.372.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M394K802K2.3M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZNTL as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 184.1% upside for ZNTL (target: $10) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$607.15$14.75$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts12162624
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+20.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FOLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARVN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallAmicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +36. 4%, compared to -93. 7% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +147. 3% versus ZNTL's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning ZNTL is approximately 369% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD?

Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ZNTL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -30. 8% for Arvinas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 5. 4% versus -43. 8% for ARVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARVN leads at 98. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZNTL: 184.

1% to $10. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), +147. 3% 10Y return). Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +147. 3%, ZNTL: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ZNTL and PRAX and ARVN and FOLD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ZNTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.