Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZNTL logo
ZNTL
PRAX logo
PRAX
ARVN logo
ARVN
FOLD logo
FOLD
IQV logo
IQV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$267M
5Y Perf.-90.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$489M
5Y Perf.-63.7%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.-18.9%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.+17.8%

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZNTL logoZNTL
PRAX logoPRAX
ARVN logoARVN
FOLD logoFOLD
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$267M$7.70B$489M$4.55B$30.79B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$89M$634M$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$-124M$-327M$-221M$-27M$1.39B
Gross Margin97.4%87.9%26.1%
Operating Margin-279.3%5.2%13.9%
Forward P/E40.6x14.2x
Total Debt$40M$110K$9M$483M$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$36M$357M$143M$214M$1.98B

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZNTL
PRAX
ARVN
FOLD
IQV
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Zentalis Pharmaceut… (ZNTL)1009.5-90.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%
Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN)10036.3-63.7%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)10081.1-18.9%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100117.8+17.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IQV leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇IQV emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

ZNTL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +491.9% vs ARVN's +0.1%
Best for: momentum
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 4.92x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 0.48
  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
  • 147.3% 10Y total return vs IQV's 177.5%
  • Beta 0.48, current ratio 2.84x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Play

IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 40.6x)
  • 8.3% margin vs ARVN's -247.5%
  • 4.7% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 8.7% vs -40.5%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOLD logoFOLD20.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueIQV logoIQVLower P/E (14.2x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsIQV logoIQV8.3% margin vs ARVN's -247.5%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.48 vs ZNTL's 2.26
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs ARVN's +0.1%
Efficiency (ROA)IQV logoIQV4.7% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 8.7% vs -40.5%

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZNTLZentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$67M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ARVNArvinas, Inc.
FY 2025
License
100.0%$130M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIQVLAGGINGARVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARVN's -2.5%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$89M$634M$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$144M-$357M-$245M$40M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$124M-$327M-$221M-$27M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$126M-$283M-$257M$30M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+97.4%+87.9%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.8%+5.2%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%-4.3%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.9%+4.7%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-91.7%+23.7%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.4%+2.7%-178.9%-89.0%+15.0%
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$267M$7.7B$489M$4.5B$30.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$271M$7.3B$355M$4.8B$45.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.96x-19.77x-5.92x-164.85x23.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x14.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple114.88x13.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.86x7.17x1.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.25x6.83x1.13x16.29x4.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x15.01x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IQV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ZNTL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARVN scores 4/9 vs ZNTL's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-53.6%-43.0%-44.4%-12.0%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-40.7%-40.2%-28.4%-3.2%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.5%-65.0%-22.4%+5.3%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.5%-49.3%-16.0%+5.1%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–913444
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.00x0.02x1.76x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$357M-$134M$269M$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$36M$357M$143M$214M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$40M$110,000$9M$483M$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.00x3.10x
IQV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $13,517 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $669 for ZNTL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs ARVN's +0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ZNTL's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+173.7%-6.9%-33.9%+1.5%-19.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+156.8%+491.9%+0.1%+134.8%+14.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.5%+1757.4%-73.7%+11.6%-14.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.3%-14.2%-91.0%+35.2%-25.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.8%-36.1%-52.8%+147.3%+177.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-46.2%+164.8%-35.9%+3.7%-5.0%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZNTL's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x1.55x1.14x0.48x1.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.95$366.52$14.51$14.50$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$37.19$6.06$5.51$153.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+72.7%+52.2%+99.9%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.531.924.172.254.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M396K794K2.3M1.5M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZNTL as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 166.7% upside for ZNTL (target: $10) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$607.15$14.75$14.50$222.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts1216262444
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+18.8%0.0%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallIQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV?

On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +35. 2%, compared to -93. 3% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +177. 5% versus ZNTL's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning ZNTL is approximately 369% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV?

IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -30. 8% for Arvinas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -43. 8% for ARVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARVN leads at 98. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZNTL: 166. 7% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), +147. 3% 10Y return). Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +147. 3%, ZNTL: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZNTL and PRAX and ARVN and FOLD and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ZNTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.