Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZNTL logo
ZNTL
PRAX logo
PRAX
ARVN logo
ARVN
FOLD logo
FOLD
IQV logo
IQV
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$267M
5Y Perf.-90.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$489M
5Y Perf.-63.7%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.-18.9%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.+17.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+227.1%

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZNTL logoZNTL
PRAX logoPRAX
ARVN logoARVN
FOLD logoFOLD
IQV logoIQV
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$267M$7.70B$489M$4.55B$30.79B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$89M$634M$16.63B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-124M$-327M$-221M$-27M$1.39B$57.05B
Gross Margin97.4%87.9%26.1%60.0%
Operating Margin-279.3%5.2%13.9%25.9%
Forward P/E40.6x14.2x14.4x
Total Debt$40M$110K$9M$483M$16.17B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$36M$357M$143M$214M$1.98B$343.34B

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZNTL
PRAX
ARVN
FOLD
IQV
JPM
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Zentalis Pharmaceut… (ZNTL)1009.5-90.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%
Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN)10036.3-63.7%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)10081.1-18.9%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100117.8+17.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100327.1+227.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOLD and IQV are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. IQVIA Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. JPM and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, ZNTL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +491.9% vs ARVN's +0.1%
Best for: momentum
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

ARVN doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

FOLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.48, current ratio 2.84x
  • 20.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Pick

IQV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.35 vs JPM's 0.81
  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 40.6x)
  • 4.7% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 8.7% vs -40.5%
Best for: valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 147.3%
  • 20.4% margin vs ARVN's -247.5%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOLD logoFOLD20.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueIQV logoIQVLower P/E (14.2x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ARVN's -247.5%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.48 vs ZNTL's 2.26
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs ARVN's +0.1%
Efficiency (ROA)IQV logoIQV4.7% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 8.7% vs -40.5%

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZNTLZentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$67M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ARVNArvinas, Inc.
FY 2025
License
100.0%$130M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIQVLAGGINGARVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARVN's -2.5%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$89M$634M$16.6B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$144M-$357M-$245M$40M$3.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$124M-$327M-$221M-$27M$1.4B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$126M-$283M-$257M$30M$2.7B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+97.4%+87.9%+26.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.8%+5.2%+13.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%-4.3%+8.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.9%+4.7%+16.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-91.7%+23.7%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.4%+2.7%-178.9%-89.0%+15.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 31% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$267M$7.7B$489M$4.5B$30.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$271M$7.3B$355M$4.8B$45.0B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.96x-19.77x-5.92x-164.85x23.15x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x14.16x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple114.88x13.11x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.86x7.17x1.89x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.25x6.83x1.13x16.29x4.75x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x15.01x8.88x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ZNTL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs ZNTL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-53.6%-43.0%-44.4%-12.0%+22.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-40.7%-40.2%-28.4%-3.2%+4.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.5%-65.0%-22.4%+5.3%+8.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.5%-49.3%-16.0%+5.1%+11.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9134445
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.00x0.02x1.76x2.44x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$357M-$134M$269M$14.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$36M$357M$143M$214M$2.0B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$40M$110,000$9M$483M$16.2B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.00x3.10x0.74x
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $669 for ZNTL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs ARVN's +0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ZNTL's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+173.7%-6.9%-33.9%+1.5%-19.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+156.8%+491.9%+0.1%+134.8%+14.0%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.5%+1757.4%-73.7%+11.6%-14.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.3%-14.2%-91.0%+35.2%-25.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.8%-36.1%-52.8%+147.3%+177.5%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-46.2%+164.8%-35.9%+3.7%-5.0%+33.6%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZNTL's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x1.55x1.14x0.48x1.16x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.95$366.52$14.51$14.50$247.05$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$37.19$6.06$5.51$153.01$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+72.7%+52.2%+99.9%+73.5%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.531.924.172.254.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M396K794K2.3M1.5M7.0M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ZNTL as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 166.7% upside for ZNTL (target: $10) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$607.15$14.75$14.50$222.22$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts121626244461
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises215
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+18.8%0.0%+4.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallIQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZNTL vs PRAX vs ARVN vs FOLD vs IQV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -93. 3% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ZNTL's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning ZNTL is approximately 369% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -30. 8% for Arvinas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -43. 8% for ARVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARVN leads at 98. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZNTL: 166. 7% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ZNTL, PRAX, ARVN, FOLD, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ZNTL or PRAX or ARVN or FOLD or IQV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ZNTL: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZNTL and PRAX and ARVN and FOLD and IQV and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZNTL (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and ARVN (Healthcare) and FOLD (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZNTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while ZNTL, PRAX, ARVN, FOLD, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.