Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $425M | $125M | $4.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $929M | $554M | $1.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-17M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 29.7% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | -3.5% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 31.3x | — | 22.3x |
| Total Debt | $199M | $170M | $563M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $46M | $70M |
ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) | 100 | 102.7 | +2.7% |
| Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.8% |
| Boot Barn Holdings,… (BOOT) | 100 | 760.6 | +660.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZUMZ plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
TLYS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.79
- Beta 0.79 vs ZUMZ's 1.87
- +232.8% vs BOOT's +45.7%
BOOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs TLYS's 61.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, Low D/E 49.8%, current ratio 2.45x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs TLYS's -2.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs TLYS's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs ZUMZ's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +232.8% vs BOOT's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs -6.0% |
ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BOOT leads in 3 of 6 categories
TLYS leads 1 • ZUMZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 3.5x TLYS's $554M. BOOT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLYS's -3.2%. On growth, BOOT holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $929M | $554M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $44M | -$9M | $297M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$17M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | $3M | -$141M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +29.7% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -3.5% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -3.2% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +0.6% | -7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +5.3% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | +121.6% | +44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TLYS and BOOT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.8x trailing earnings, BOOT trades at a 13% valuation discount to ZUMZ's 32.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BOOT's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZUMZ's 29.1x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $425M | $125M | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $496M | $249M | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.09x | -7.17x | 27.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.32x | — | 22.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.12x | — | 18.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.23x | 2.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 1.48x | 4.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.82x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOOT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOOT delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-21 for TLYS. BOOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLYS's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZUMZ scores 7/9 vs BOOT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.4% | -21.3% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -5.3% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | -6.0% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | -8.5% | +15.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 2.00x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $71M | $124M | $493M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $46M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199M | $170M | $563M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 159.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOOT five years ago would be worth $21,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,885 for TLYS. Over the past 12 months, TLYS leads with a +232.8% total return vs BOOT's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOOT at 31.6% vs TLYS's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.3% | +105.9% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +113.7% | +232.8% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.4% | -46.2% | +127.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | -51.1% | +119.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.8% | +61.9% | +1960.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.8% | -18.7% | +31.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZUMZ and TLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZUMZ's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZUMZ currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs TLYS's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 0.79x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.70 | $5.52 | $210.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.41 | $0.57 | $110.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +75.4% | +77.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 50.2 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 151K | 1.4M | 616K |
Analyst Outlook
TLYS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZUMZ as "Hold", TLYS as "Hold", BOOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 128.4% upside for TLYS (target: $10) vs -22.1% for ZUMZ (target: $20).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | $9.50 | $231.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 17 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BOOT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TLYS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
ZUMZ vs TLYS vs BOOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS). Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT?
On trailing P/E, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the cheapest at 27. 8x versus Zumiez Inc. at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT?
Over the past 5 years, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) delivered a total return of +119. 0%, compared to -51. 1% for Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOOT returned +1960% versus ZUMZ's +56. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tilly's, Inc.
(TLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Zumiez Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning ZUMZ is approximately 136% more volatile than TLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -2. 8% for Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zumiez Inc. grew EPS 961. 9% year-over-year, compared to 22. 5% for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOOT leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT?
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 5% net margin versus -3. 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOOT leads at 12. 5% versus -3. 5% for TLYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOOT leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) trades at 22. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Zumiez Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLYS: 128. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZUMZ or TLYS or BOOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1960% 10Y return). Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOOT: +1960%, ZUMZ: +56. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZUMZ and TLYS and BOOT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.