Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $5.77B | $2.73B | $6.38B | $2.52B | $4.50B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.02B | $1.08B | $1.82B | $902M | $1.89B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $274M | $169M | $465M | $169M | $392M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 71.6% | 65.4% | 73.6% | 67.4% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 19.4% | 32.4% | 24.3% | 25.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 11.2x | 12.6x | 11.5x | 11.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $371M | $921M | $327M | $1.30B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $253M | $2.54B | $185M | $271M | $343.34B |
AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic Union Bank… (AUB) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
| TowneBank (TOWN) | 100 | 189.3 | +89.3% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 28.2% NII/revenue growth vs TOWN's -1.6%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.5x)
- 3.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs UBSI's 3.2%
TOWN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 15.3%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.68 vs AUB's 1.11, lower leverage
UBSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 39 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
- Beta 0.78, yield 3.2%, current ratio 28.21x
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
Among these 6 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.8% vs TOWN's +9.8%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FULT's 114.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs AUB's 10.65
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.2% NII/revenue growth vs TOWN's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TOWN's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs AUB's 1.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs UBSI's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs TOWN's +9.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TOWN's 0.5% |
AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UBSI leads in 1 of 6 categories
FULT leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • AUB leads 0 • TOWN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBSI leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 310.7x NBTB's $902M. UBSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUB's 13.5%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $1.1B | $1.8B | $902M | $1.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $397M | $238M | $590M | $241M | $529M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $274M | $169M | $465M | $169M | $392M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $212M | $487M | $225M | $267M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.9% | +71.6% | +65.4% | +73.6% | +67.4% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +19.4% | +32.4% | +24.3% | +25.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +15.6% | +25.5% | +18.8% | +20.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +109.7% | +19.6% | +26.7% | +24.9% | +14.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | -7.3% | +30.0% | +39.5% | +47.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 43% valuation discount to AUB's 19.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs AUB's 19.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $2.7B | $6.4B | $2.5B | $4.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.0B | $2.8B | $4.8B | $2.7B | $5.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.85x | 16.14x | 13.96x | 14.47x | 11.23x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.82x | 11.23x | 12.61x | 11.54x | 11.49x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 19.55x | 8.43x | 2.19x | 2.06x | 0.80x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.81x | 13.53x | 8.06x | 11.03x | 10.43x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.34x | 2.70x | 3.50x | 2.90x | 2.38x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.13x | 1.17x | 1.29x | 1.23x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.48x | 12.88x | 13.25x | 11.49x | 15.81x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for AUB. TOWN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBSI scores 7/9 vs AUB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +7.3% | +8.6% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +6.0% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +4.7% | +3.0% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.15x | 0.17x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $118M | -$1.6B | $142M | $1.0B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $253M | $2.5B | $185M | $271M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $371M | $921M | $327M | $1.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.74x | 1.01x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,094 for AUB. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs TOWN's +9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | +10.3% | +20.9% | +17.6% | +21.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.5% | +9.8% | +30.8% | +18.3% | +37.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.3% | +56.2% | +58.2% | +48.5% | +96.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | +32.0% | +40.9% | +44.4% | +61.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.1% | +104.2% | +58.5% | +108.5% | +114.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +16.0% | +16.5% | +14.1% | +25.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOWN and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs TOWN's 94.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.68x | 0.78x | 0.76x | 0.99x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.18 | $37.86 | $45.93 | $48.27 | $23.48 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.64 | $31.91 | $34.10 | $39.20 | $16.60 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +94.2% | +99.4% | +99.8% | +99.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 58.6 | 62.9 | 63.1 | 68.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 878K | 455K | 736K | 266K | 1.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AUB and UBSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AUB as "Buy", TOWN as "Hold", UBSI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.9% upside for AUB (target: $46) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, AUB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.69% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | — | $46.67 | $46.00 | $23.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 20 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +2.9% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 14 | 39 | 13 | 5 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.49 | $1.03 | $1.48 | $1.43 | $0.77 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +0.4% | +1.5% | +3.9% |
UBSI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FULT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AUB vs TOWN vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is the stronger pick with 28.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for TowneBank (TOWN). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.
2x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation at 19. 9x. On forward P/E, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +20. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus UBSI's +58. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TowneBank (TOWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning AUB is approximately 63% more volatile than TOWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TowneBank (TOWN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is pulling ahead at 28.
2% versus -1. 6% for TowneBank (TOWN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -9. 4% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 5% net margin versus 15. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBSI leads at 32. 4% versus 19. 5% for AUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AUB: 12. 9% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is AUB or TOWN or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, AUB: +95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AUB and TOWN and UBSI and NBTB and FULT and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUB is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOWN is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.