Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LION logo
LION
AMZN logo
AMZN
NFLX logo
NFLX
MSFT logo
MSFT
AAPL logo
AAPL
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LION
Lionsgate Studios Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.16B
5Y Perf.+71.9%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57T
5Y Perf.+35.2%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$340.43B
5Y Perf.+25.2%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.90T
5Y Perf.-5.9%
AAPL
Apple Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.27T
5Y Perf.+51.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+58.3%

LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LION logoLION
AMZN logoAMZN
NFLX logoNFLX
MSFT logoMSFT
AAPL logoAAPL
JPM logoJPM
IndustryEntertainmentSpecialty RetailEntertainmentSoftware - InfrastructureConsumer ElectronicsBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$4.16B$2.57T$340.43B$2.90T$4.27T$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$2.63B$742.78B$45.18B$318.27B$451.44B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-198M$90.80B$10.98B$125.22B$122.58B$57.05B
Gross Margin39.5%50.6%48.5%68.3%47.9%60.0%
Operating Margin4.5%11.5%29.5%46.8%32.6%25.9%
Forward P/E47.4x27.1x22.5x23.3x33.3x14.4x
Total Debt$3.98B$152.99B$14.46B$112.18B$112.38B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$182M$86.81B$9.03B$30.24B$35.93B$343.34B

LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LION
AMZN
NFLX
MSFT
AAPL
JPM
StockMay 24Jun 26Return
Lionsgate Studios C… (LION)100171.9+71.9%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100135.2+35.2%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100125.2+25.2%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)10094.1-5.9%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100151.4+51.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100158.3+58.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. LION, MSFT, and AAPL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LION
Lionsgate Studios Corp.
The Momentum Pick

LION ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +116.6% vs NFLX's -33.9%
Best for: momentum
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

AMZN doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Growth Play

NFLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • PEG 0.68 vs AAPL's 1.86
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs LION's -17.6%
  • Beta 0.34 vs AMZN's 1.43
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
  • Beta 0.84, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
  • 39.3% margin vs LION's -7.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AAPL
Apple Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 11.3% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 7.6%
  • 34.0% ROA vs LION's -3.8%, ROIC 67.4% vs 4.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 33.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.86
  • 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs LION's -17.6%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 33.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs LION's -7.5%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.34 vs AMZN's 1.43
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LION logoLION+116.6% vs NFLX's -33.9%
Efficiency (ROA)AAPL logoAAPL34.0% ROA vs LION's -3.8%, ROIC 67.4% vs 4.3%

LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the AI Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the AI Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
LIONLionsgate Studios Corp.
FY 2024
Studio Business
41.2%$3.2B
Television Production
20.7%$1.6B
Motion Picture
20.5%$1.6B
Media Networks
17.7%$1.4B
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B
AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGNFLX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 282.2x LION's $2.6B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LION's -7.5%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLION logoLIONLionsgate Studios…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.6B$742.8B$45.2B$318.3B$451.4B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$155.9B$30.1B$192.6B$160.0B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$198M$90.8B$11.0B$125.2B$122.6B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$66M-$2.5B$9.5B$72.9B$129.2B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.5%+50.6%+48.5%+68.3%+47.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.5%+11.5%+29.5%+46.8%+32.6%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.5%+12.2%+24.3%+39.3%+27.2%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.5%-0.3%+20.9%+22.9%+28.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.3%+16.6%+17.6%+18.3%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+130.0%+74.8%+31.1%+23.4%+21.8%+16.0%
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 59% valuation discount to AAPL's 39.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs AAPL's 2.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLION logoLIONLionsgate Studios…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$4.2B$2.57T$340.4B$2.90T$4.27T$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.0B$2.63T$345.9B$2.98T$4.35T$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-20.75x33.27x31.75x28.65x39.03x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.47.37x27.13x22.55x23.25x33.26x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x0.96x1.52x2.18x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.69x18.06x11.50x18.35x30.06x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.58x3.58x7.53x10.30x10.27x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.28x13.03x8.49x59.25x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF365.08x333.39x35.98x40.53x43.27x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $16 for JPM. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs LION's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLION logoLIONLionsgate Studios…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.3%+41.3%+33.1%+146.7%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.8%+11.5%+19.8%+19.2%+34.0%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.3%+14.7%+29.8%+24.9%+67.4%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+15.3%+30.5%+29.7%+69.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9467685
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.54x0.33x1.52x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.8B$66.2B$5.4B$81.9B$76.4B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$182M$86.8B$9.0B$30.2B$35.9B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.0B$153.0B$14.5B$112.2B$112.4B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.26x39.96x17.33x55.65x0.74x
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LION and AAPL and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,684 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,517 for LION. Over the past 12 months, LION leads with a +116.6% total return vs NFLX's -33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs MSFT's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLION logoLIONLionsgate Studios…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+54.0%+5.3%-11.7%-17.0%+7.6%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+116.6%+11.9%-33.9%-17.7%+46.7%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.2%+88.5%+89.5%+20.7%+60.1%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.2%+41.0%+60.7%+56.0%+126.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+38.8%+567.1%+755.6%+727.4%+1130.8%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.8%+23.5%+23.7%+6.5%+17.0%+33.6%
Evenly matched — LION and AAPL and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LION and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LION currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLION logoLIONLionsgate Studios…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.95x1.43x0.34x0.84x0.89x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.01$278.56$134.12$555.45$317.40$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.55$197.28$75.01$356.28$195.07$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.4%+85.6%+59.9%+70.3%+91.7%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.736.831.236.848.159.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M42.9M35.5M33.7M43.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — LION and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MSFT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LION as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.3% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 1.3% for LION (target: $15). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs AAPL's 0.35%.

MetricLION logoLIONLionsgate Studios…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.50$307.77$111.83$551.96$326.47$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts894998211061
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+0.4%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0211315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.23$1.03$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.7%+0.6%+2.1%+3.9%
Evenly matched — MSFT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LION vs AMZN vs NFLX vs MSFT vs AAPL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Lionsgate Studios Corp. (LION). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lionsgate Studios Corp. (LION) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Apple Inc. at 39. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 68x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) delivered a total return of +126. 8%, compared to +25. 2% for Lionsgate Studios Corp. (LION). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1131% versus LION's +38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning AMZN is approximately 320% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -17. 6% for Lionsgate Studios Corp. (LION). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -60. 5% for Lionsgate Studios Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -7. 5% for Lionsgate Studios Corp. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 5. 6% for LION. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 47. 4x for Lionsgate Studios Corp. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 41. 3% to $551. 96.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. LION, AMZN, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LION or AMZN or NFLX or MSFT or AAPL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

84), 0. 8% yield, +727. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +727. 4%, AMZN: +567. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LION and AMZN and NFLX and MSFT and AAPL and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (LION (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and NFLX (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology) and AAPL (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LION is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. MSFT, JPM pay a dividend while LION, AMZN, NFLX, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.