Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PGC logo
PGC
WSFS logo
WSFS
NBTB logo
NBTB
IBCP logo
IBCP
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$819M
5Y Perf.+146.9%
WSFS
WSFS Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.97B
5Y Perf.+162.2%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PGC logoPGC
WSFS logoWSFS
NBTB logoNBTB
IBCP logoIBCP
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$819M$3.97B$2.52B$730M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$441M$1.36B$902M$310M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$37M$287M$169M$69M$57.05B
Gross Margin58.1%74.7%73.6%69.1%60.0%
Operating Margin11.9%28.0%24.3%26.2%25.9%
Forward P/E12.5x12.0x11.5x10.0x14.4x
Total Debt$260M$303M$327M$117M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$1.33B$185M$52M$343.34B

PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PGC
WSFS
NBTB
IBCP
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Peapack-Gladstone F… (PGC)100246.9+146.9%
WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS)100262.2+162.2%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBTB and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PGC, WSFS, and IBCP also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

PGC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +64.7% vs IBCP's +16.4%
Best for: momentum
WSFS
WSFS Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.

  • PEG 0.69 vs IBCP's 1.90
  • NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • PEG 0.69 vs 1.64
Best for: valuation efficiency and bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
  • 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
ValueWSFS logoWSFSPEG 0.69 vs 1.64
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.72 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)PGC logoPGC+64.7% vs IBCP's +16.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%

PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PGCPeapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
76.6%$217M
Wealth Management Division
23.4%$66M
WSFSWSFS Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Service, Other
50.0%$58M
Managed Service Fees
17.0%$20M
Miscellaneous Products And Services
16.5%$19M
Capital Market Revenue
8.5%$10M
Currency Preparation
5.8%$7M
ATM Insurance
2.2%$3M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWSFSLAGGINGIBCP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WSFS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGC's 8.5%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$441M$1.4B$902M$310M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$408M$241M$89M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$37M$287M$169M$69M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$214M$225M$70M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.1%+74.7%+73.6%+69.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.9%+28.0%+24.3%+26.2%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.5%+21.1%+18.8%+22.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%+15.7%+24.9%+22.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.7%+22.9%+39.5%+2.3%+16.0%
WSFS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PGC and WSFS and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 50% valuation discount to PGC's 21.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSFS offers better value at 0.84x vs PGC's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$819M$4.0B$2.5B$730M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$2.9B$2.7B$795M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.92x14.78x14.47x10.85x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.49x12.04x11.54x9.99x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x0.84x2.06x2.06x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.92x7.22x11.03x9.78x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.86x2.92x2.90x2.32x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.24x1.51x1.29x1.47x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.66x18.57x11.49x10.41x8.88x
Evenly matched — PGC and WSFS and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for PGC. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGC scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.8%+10.6%+9.5%+14.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.4%+1.1%+1.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+9.5%+7.9%+10.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.8%+10.3%+2.4%+2.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986785
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.40x0.11x0.17x0.23x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$251M-$1.0B$142M$65M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$1.3B$185M$52M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$260M$303M$327M$117M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.32x1.30x1.05x0.91x0.74x
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,438 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, PGC leads with a +64.7% total return vs IBCP's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+66.8%+37.3%+17.6%+12.0%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.7%+43.1%+18.3%+16.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.5%+97.3%+48.5%+110.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.6%+52.7%+44.4%+80.9%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.7%+129.1%+108.5%+194.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%+25.4%+14.1%+28.1%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WSFS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x0.73x0.76x0.72x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.57$75.34$48.27$39.16$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.42$49.92$39.20$29.63$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.9%+99.8%+90.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.264.763.161.259.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded116K361K266K135K7.0M
Evenly matched — WSFS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PGC as "Buy", WSFS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.1% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs PGC's 0.43%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$79.00$46.00$38.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts71310761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.9%+3.0%+2.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01131115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$0.68$1.43$1.03$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+7.3%+0.4%+1.7%+3.9%
Evenly matched — NBTB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WSFS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallWSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PGC vs WSFS vs NBTB vs IBCP vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 69x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +44. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 31% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WSFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM?

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus 8. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 7. 1% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).

09

Is PGC or WSFS or NBTB or IBCP or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PGC and WSFS and NBTB and IBCP and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. WSFS, NBTB, IBCP, JPM pay a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.