Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $109M | $79.60B | $97.79B | $2.85B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $12.64B | $6.76B | $1.39B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $3.30B | $4.24B | $243M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 61.9% | 86.3% | 52.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 38.7% | 65.6% | 22.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 17.3x | 22.0x | 11.4x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $20.28B | $3.76B | $1.82B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $837M | $4.42B | $657M | $343.34B |
PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| CME Group Inc. (CME) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive and bank quality is your priority.
- Beta 0.21, yield 3.3%, current ratio 0.06x
- NIM 2.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.21 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
ICE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
CME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs PROV's 0.5%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- +32.5% vs ICE's -20.4%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CME's 262.4%
- PEG 0.81 vs WAFD's 3.69
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 22.0x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.60
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 22.0x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.60 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs PROV's 0.5% |
PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CME leads in 2 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • PROV leads 0 • ICE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4661.3x PROV's $60M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PROV's 11.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $12.6B | $6.8B | $1.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $6.5B | $4.7B | $277M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $3.3B | $4.2B | $243M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $4.3B | $4.4B | $215M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +61.9% | +86.3% | +52.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +38.7% | +65.6% | +22.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +26.1% | +62.8% | +17.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +33.9% | +64.4% | +15.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +23.1% | +21.4% | +46.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, WAFD trades at a 42% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $79.6B | $97.8B | $2.9B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $99.0B | $97.1B | $4.0B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 24.36x | 24.15x | 14.10x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 17.34x | 21.98x | 11.35x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.74x | 1.76x | 4.58x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 15.34x | 21.56x | 13.41x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 6.30x | 15.00x | 2.02x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 2.77x | 3.38x | 0.98x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 18.56x | 23.32x | 13.71x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for PROV. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +11.6% | +15.3% | +8.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.5% | +10.2% | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +9.5% | +3.6% | +5.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.70x | 0.13x | 0.60x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $19.4B | -$666M | $1.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $837M | $4.4B | $657M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $20.3B | $3.8B | $1.8B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 6.53x | 41.55x | 0.48x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,816 for PROV. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +32.5% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | -11.8% | +3.2% | +17.1% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | -20.4% | +3.6% | +32.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +34.6% | +67.9% | +37.6% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +30.9% | +46.2% | +29.5% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | +195.3% | +262.4% | +91.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +10.4% | +18.9% | +11.2% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CME and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.35x | -0.28x | 0.66x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $189.35 | $329.16 | $37.10 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $136.67 | $244.56 | $26.31 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +74.2% | +81.9% | +99.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 31.9 | 40.1 | 63.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 3.2M | 2.6M | 525K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CME and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", ICE as "Buy", CME as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -6.5% for PROV (target: $16). For income investors, CME offers the higher dividend yield at 4.05% vs ICE's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $194.00 | $320.80 | $35.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 36 | 36 | 11 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.4% | +4.1% | +2.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $1.93 | $10.92 | $1.05 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +1.7% | +0.3% | +3.6% | +3.9% |
CME leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAFD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PROV vs ICE vs CME vs WAFD vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM?
On trailing P/E, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +18. 2% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (PROV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PROV's +25. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -435% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM?
CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 10. 4% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 14. 8% for PROV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for CME Group Inc. — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CME Group Inc. (CME) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is PROV or ICE or CME or WAFD or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 4. 1% yield, +262. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +262. 4%, WAFD: +91. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and ICE and CME and WAFD and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.