Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $577M | $272M | $184M | $444M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $120M | $135M | $208M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $25M | $16M | $35M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 70.3% | 54.3% | 51.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 27.2% | 14.1% | 23.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 9.7x | 11.0x | 10.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $115M | $70M | $180M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $217M | $132M | $26M | $225M | $343.34B |
UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity Bancorp, Inc. (UNTY) | 100 | 396.0 | +296.0% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 349.9 | +249.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UNTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 39.7%
- 415.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- NIM 3.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 15.5% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.2%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 9.7x)
- 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
MNSB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.60 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.24 vs JPM's 0.81
- Beta 0.65, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.89x
- +57.3% vs JPM's +21.8%
Among these 5 stocks, JPM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.3% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUNC's 0.4% |
UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UNTY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 1 • MNSB leads 1 • BWFG leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UNTY leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2345.8x FUNC's $120M. UNTY is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $120M | $135M | $208M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $35M | $23M | $53M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $25M | $16M | $35M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $16M | $11M | -$5M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +70.3% | +54.3% | +51.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +27.2% | +14.1% | +23.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +20.5% | +11.5% | +16.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +13.1% | +7.9% | -2.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.5% | +20.2% | +120.9% | +2.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNSB and BWFG each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, UNTY trades at a 38% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $577M | $272M | $184M | $444M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $627M | $255M | $227M | $398M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.99x | 11.11x | 14.16x | 12.50x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.70x | 9.66x | 11.03x | 10.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.48x | 0.85x | — | 0.29x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.30x | 7.85x | 11.90x | 7.58x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.06x | 2.28x | 1.35x | 2.14x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 1.34x | 0.87x | 1.44x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.02x | 17.67x | 17.26x | 16.98x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UNTY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UNTY delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.8% | +12.6% | +7.3% | +12.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.0% | +7.1% | +5.0% | +8.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +9.8% | +6.0% | +4.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.56x | 0.32x | 0.60x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$17M | $43M | -$45M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $217M | $132M | $26M | $225M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $115M | $70M | $180M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.33x | 0.99x | 0.31x | 0.49x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UNTY five years ago would be worth $26,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +57.3% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.5% | +14.3% | +26.5% | +24.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.1% | +44.4% | +37.2% | +57.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | +192.2% | +13.1% | +132.8% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.6% | +141.9% | +18.1% | +111.5% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +415.6% | +361.3% | +135.4% | +198.5% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | +43.0% | +4.2% | +32.5% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.67x | 0.60x | 0.65x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.30 | $42.35 | $25.17 | $56.48 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.06 | $28.00 | $17.86 | $33.85 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +98.9% | +99.0% | +98.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 71.6 | 65.3 | 63.3 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 13K | 45K | 44K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FUNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UNTY as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", BWFG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.4% upside for UNTY (target: $67) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FUNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs UNTY's 0.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.50 | $25.00 | — | — | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +2.2% | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $0.92 | $0.40 | $0.80 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.3% | +3.9% |
UNTY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
UNTY vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BWFG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Unity Bancorp, Inc.
(UNTY) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Unity Bancorp, Inc. (UNTY) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Unity Bancorp, Inc. (UNTY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Unity Bancorp, Inc.
(UNTY) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Unity Bancorp, Inc.
(UNTY) delivered a total return of +163. 6%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MNSB's +135. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 58% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Unity Bancorp, Inc.
(UNTY) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM?
Unity Bancorp, Inc.
(UNTY) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 8% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UNTY leads at 40. 1% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UNTY: 17. 4% to $66. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Unity Bancorp, Inc. (UNTY).
09Is UNTY or FUNC or MNSB or BWFG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 2% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +361. 3%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UNTY and FUNC and MNSB and BWFG and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UNTY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.