Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.2x · EV/EBITDA 10.4x · ROE 9.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.9B | $2.7B | $3.4B | $2.6B | $3.0B | $3.0B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.0B | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.5B | $4.3B | $4.8B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $2.9B | $3.6B | $2.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.19 | 16.60 | 41.45 | 10.38 | 13.05 | 23.66 | 11573.33 | 19.09 | 21.21 | 31.32 | 35.85 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.43 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.74 | 1.51 | 1.89 | 1.45 | 1.75 | 1.86 | 1.56 | 1.58 | 1.40 | 1.78 | 2.28 |
| P/FCF | 18.77 | 17.38 | 20.17 | 13.68 | — | 10.69 | 5.57 | 12.01 | 7.56 | — | 56.29 |
| P/OCF | 12.42 | 11.50 | 14.89 | 10.72 | 147.28 | 9.52 | 5.11 | 9.29 | 6.36 | 436.94 | 26.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.65 | 0.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45 | 9.95 | 14.95 | 7.51 | 9.40 | 13.38 | 14.72 | 10.08 | 11.72 | 20.71 | 21.73 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.84 | 13.54 | 15.47 | 11.71 | 12.43 | 19.22 | 10.24 | 14.48 | 15.42 | 27.74 | 21.89 |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.63 | 28.47 | 20.88 | — | 14.15 | 6.74 | 15.67 | 10.90 | — | 61.73 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 11.7% | 13.3% | 13.9% | 13.4% | 15.6% | 13.9% | 11.3% | 10.8% | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 5.1% | 4.5% | 3.3% | 1.6% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.0% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 0.1% | 1.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.1% | 9.1% | 4.5% | 14.3% | 13.9% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 0.3% | 5.8% |
| ROA | 3.1% | 3.1% | 1.6% | 5.1% | 5.0% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 3.5% | 2.6% | 0.1% | 2.6% |
| ROIC | 7.5% | 7.5% | 5.0% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 6.8% | 3.4% | 6.7% | 4.3% | 4.2% | 3.6% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 5.7% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 6.9% | 3.4% | 7.4% | 4.7% | 4.3% | 3.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.28 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.93 | 3.93 | 4.56 | 2.72 | 3.04 | 3.49 | 4.61 | 2.54 | 3.74 | 6.85 | 2.39 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 0.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.69 | 3.69 | 4.36 | 2.59 | 2.88 | 3.27 | 2.56 | 2.35 | 3.58 | 6.48 | 1.91 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 10.25 | 8.30 | 7.20 | — | 3.46 | 1.17 | 3.66 | 3.33 | — | 5.44 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.28 | 3.28 | 3.62 | 4.13 | 8.48 | 7.21 | 6.19 | 4.30 | 3.53 | 6.69 | 10.71 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.33 | 1.40 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 1.48 | 1.63 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.33 | 1.40 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 1.48 | 1.63 | 1.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.60 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.60 | 1.40 | 1.59 | 1.76 | 1.78 | 1.43 | 2.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.48 | 67.51 | 67.81 | 63.33 | 69.71 | 55.25 | 60.98 | 57.46 | 69.48 | 57.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 2.2% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 40.4% | 40.4% | 69.4% | 22.9% | 22.5% | 40.4% | 16433.3% | 37.4% | 47.0% | 1039.5% | 64.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.2% | 6.0% | 2.4% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| FCF Yield | 5.3% | 5.8% | 5.0% | 7.3% | — | 9.4% | 18.0% | 8.3% | 13.2% | — | 1.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.2% | 4.5% | 1.7% | 5.3% | 3.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 2.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.3% | 7.0% | 3.3% | 7.5% | 5.0% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $63M | $64M | $66M | $68M | $68M | $67M | $67M | $66M | $58M | $57M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ABM stock.
ABM Industries Incorporated's current P/E ratio is 19.2x. The historical average is 20.7x. This places it at the 55th percentile of its historical range.
ABM Industries Incorporated's current EV/EBITDA is 10.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.8x.
ABM Industries Incorporated's return on equity (ROE) is 9.1%. The historical average is 10.0%.
Based on historical data, ABM Industries Incorporated is trading at a P/E of 19.2x. This is at the 55th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ABM Industries Incorporated's current dividend yield is 2.11% with a payout ratio of 40.4%.
ABM Industries Incorporated has 11.7% gross margin and 3.7% operating margin.
ABM Industries Incorporated's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from wage inflation
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Growth Premium Already Discounted
ABM trades at a forward P/E of 12.48, a steep discount to the peer median of 21.37, but the 0.07 PEG ratio suggests the market assigns minimal value to future earnings growth, pricing the stock more like a mature utility than an industrial services provider.
The valuation framework indicates the market is skeptical of ABM's ability to translate revenue growth into durable earnings expansion, likely due to its structurally thin margins. The forward EV/EBITDA of 8.39 is also significantly below the peer group average, suggesting investors are applying a deep discount for execution risk and the commodity-like nature of its core janitorial services. This pricing appears to fully reflect the headwinds from commercial office occupancy and wage inflation, leaving limited room for multiple expansion unless the Technical Solutions segment demonstrates material margin accretion.
Marginal Efficiency Amid Scale
Despite achieving a record gross margin of 12.3% in 2026Q3, ABM's net margin of 2.1% highlights that nearly 83% of gross profit is consumed by operating expenses, indicating limited operating leverage and persistent overhead burdens.
The profit waterfall reveals that while gross margin has shown sequential improvement, the operating margin of 3.9% demonstrates that selling, general, and administrative costs remain a formidable drain on earnings. This suggests that the company's scale does not translate into proportional administrative efficiency, a trend that needs to be monitored against the 'ELEVATE' technology initiative. The true earning power is best reflected by the net margin, which has remained constrained below 2.5% for the majority of the period, underscoring that any cost inflation directly erodes already razor-thin profitability.
Capital Efficiency Stagnation
ABM's ROIC of 1.9% in 2026Q3, while improved from the negative territory of 2024Q4, remains substantially below the peer median of 16.7%, suggesting the company's capital-intensive acquisition model is generating returns well below its cost of capital.
The trajectory from an ROIC of 0.5% in 2024Q4 to 1.9% currently indicates a recovery from a troubled period, but the absolute level remains unacceptably low for a business that is purportedly asset-light. This low return is driven by both the thin operating margins and the significant goodwill-heavy balance sheet, which inflates the invested capital base. The stagnant ROIC implies that recent acquisitions have not yet delivered synergistic returns, and the heavy investment in technology may be diluting capital efficiency in the near term.
Working Capital as the Primary Swing Factor
Days Sales Outstanding have compressed to 59 in 2026Q3 from 72 a year ago, yet the erratic free cash flow margins from -5.8% to 6.7% over the period indicate that collection improvements are volatile and offset by other working capital dynamics.
The reduction in DSO is a positive signal for customer payment discipline and collection efficiency, which should aid cash conversion. However, the inability to generate consistent free cash flow, as evidenced by the wild swings in FCF margin, suggests that other components like inventory and payables management are less predictable. This volatility makes it difficult to model ABM's cash generation with precision and highlights a key operational risk; even modest disruptions in the collection cycle can materially impact quarterly liquidity.
Debt Growth Outpaces Earnings Power
The debt-to-equity ratio has risen to 1.05 from 0.76 over ten quarters, while the interest coverage ratio has concurrently declined to 3.14 from 3.94, indicating that the company's growing debt load is becoming less comfortably serviced by its operating income.
The simultaneous rise in leverage and decline in coverage ratios paints a picture of a balance sheet that is slowly becoming more constrained. While a coverage ratio above 3x is still adequate, the trend warrants monitoring, especially if wage inflation continues to pressure operating income. The increasing reliance on debt to fund acquisitions and operations, without a corresponding improvement in returns, raises the question of long-term financial sustainability. The current profile is manageable but leaves the company with reduced flexibility in an economic downturn.
The Inflation-Adjusted Net Margin Trap
ABM's net margin is frequently misinterpreted as a proxy for profitability in isolation, but in a high-inflation environment, it is structurally compressed by wage costs that lag price escalators in long-term contracts, obscuring true economic earnings.
For a labor-intensive, long-contract-cycle business like ABM, the reported net margin of 2.1% is a lagging indicator that fails to capture the real-time squeeze from input cost inflation. Analysts often apply sector-average net margins, but ABM's cost structure and contract terms make this comparison invalid. A more appropriate metric would be the 'margin of safety' between gross margin and the rate of labor cost inflation, which is not directly reported but can be inferred from the divergence between revenue growth and operating expense growth. Relying on the standard net margin risks fundamentally mispricing the company's vulnerability to wage shocks.