Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -135.6%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.4B | $285M | $781M | $5.1B | $6.6B | $10.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.3B | $148M | $631M | $5.1B | $6.2B | $9.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 1.19 | 2.76 | 6.62 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 10.99 | 2.25 | 1.66 | 7.76 | 6.33 | 9.22 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.02 | 0.10 | 1.17 | 2.59 | 5.96 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -3.2% | -3.2% | 0.1% | 1.6% | 4.7% | 4.3% | 7.7% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.1% | -7.1% | -4.8% | -5.4% | -4.4% | -24.5% | -4.7% | -13.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.8% | -6.8% | -4.3% | -6.1% | -4.5% | -26.7% | -4.9% | -35.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -135.6% | -135.6% | -46.0% | -30.9% | -10.0% | -100.8% | — | — |
| ROA | -27.0% | -27.0% | -15.0% | -15.3% | -6.5% | -40.0% | -14.1% | -70.2% |
| ROIC | -203.2% | -203.2% | -47.6% | -28.4% | -21.8% | -289.6% | — | — |
| ROCE | -108.4% | -108.4% | -43.4% | -24.1% | -8.8% | -52.8% | -29.6% | -52.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.08 | -0.32 | -0.09 | -0.40 | -0.91 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -59.85 | -59.85 | -39.28 | -28.21 | -19.22 | -61.31 | -6.66 | -11.65 |
Net cash position: cash ($174M) exceeds total debt ($37M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.27 | 1.51 | 2.71 | 3.83 | 1.10 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.27 | 1.51 | 2.71 | 3.83 | 1.10 | 1.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 1.64 | 2.96 | 0.40 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 4.67 | 3.50 | 2.48 | 1.41 | 0.96 | 2.73 | 1.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.45 | 61.25 | 79.70 | 75.25 | 70.39 | 43.31 | 42.85 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $15M | $15M | $15M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AGL stock.
Agilon Health, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Agilon Health, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -135.6%. The historical average is -64.6%.
Based on historical data, Agilon Health, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Agilon Health, Inc. has -3.2% gross margin and -7.1% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative gross margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Inflection Remains Elusive
According to the latest quarterly data, Agilon's gross margin swung to 7.2% in 2026Q2 from -6.2% in 2025Q4, yet the trailing twelve-month average remains -3.2%, indicating persistent medical cost overruns.
The 2026Q2 improvement appears driven by lower utilization and favorable reserve development, but the ten-quarter history shows gross margin oscillating between -6.2% and 7.2% with no sustained positive trend. Operating margin of 0.8% in 2026Q2 is the first positive print since 2024Q1, yet it remains razor-thin and vulnerable to medical inflation. The negative gross margin on a trailing basis suggests the core capitation model has not yet achieved structural profitability, and investors should monitor whether the 2026Q2 beat is a one-off or the start of a durable recovery.
Return on Capital Swings Violently
ROIC swung from -144.8% in 2025Q4 to 23.4% in 2026Q1 and 7.7% in 2026Q2, as reported in the ratio data, reflecting extreme earnings volatility rather than a stable compounding trend.
The dramatic swings in ROIC are driven by thin equity base and volatile net income, with the 2025Q4 trough coinciding with a large loss and negative equity. The 2026Q1 spike to 23.4% appears to be a one-off due to a small profit on a reduced capital base, not a sustainable return profile. Over the ten quarters, ROIC has been negative in seven quarters, indicating that the company is not consistently generating returns above its cost of capital. The lack of a stable positive ROIC suggests that the business model is still in a high-risk maturation phase, and investors should not extrapolate the recent positive quarters as evidence of a structural improvement.
Working Capital Volatility Masks Claims Timing
DSO improved to 60 days in 2026Q2 from 92 days in 2024Q2, while DPO fell to 50 days from 91 days, per the ratio data, indicating a shift in payment timing that may not reflect operational efficiency.
The improvement in DSO suggests faster collection of capitation receivables, but the concurrent decline in DPO indicates Agilon is paying medical claims faster, which could strain liquidity. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO, but the working capital swings in the cash flow statement (from +$82.7M to -$114.0M) highlight the lumpiness of claims settlement. This volatility suggests that the efficiency metrics are heavily influenced by the timing of IBNR adjustments and claims payables, rather than genuine improvements in working capital management. Investors should focus on the trend in medical claims payable days, as a declining DPO could signal a deliberate effort to accelerate provider payments, which may be a competitive necessity but also a cash drain.
Low Debt Masks Operating Risk
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.15 in 2026Q2 from 0.07 in 2024Q1, but interest coverage improved to 2.71 from negative levels, according to the ratio data, indicating minimal financial leverage but significant operating risk.
The absolute debt level is modest at $33.4M, and the D/E ratio remains low, suggesting that Agilon is not at risk of financial distress from debt service. However, the negative interest coverage in prior quarters (e.g., -108.3 in 2025Q4) reflects that operating losses were insufficient to cover interest expenses, though the 2026Q2 positive coverage is a welcome change. The real leverage is operational: negative gross margins mean that each dollar of revenue currently consumes more cash than it generates, which is a far greater threat than balance sheet leverage. The low D/E may give the company financial flexibility, but it does not mitigate the core challenge of achieving positive medical margins.
Liquidity Cushion Thins as Cash Declines
Current ratio fell to 1.08 in 2026Q2 from 1.36 in 2024Q2, while cash dropped to $107.2M from $193.9M, as per the balance sheet data, indicating a shrinking buffer against claims volatility.
The current ratio remains above 1.0, but the trend is concerning: it has declined for six consecutive quarters, and the quick ratio is identical, suggesting that inventory is not a factor. The cash balance of $107.2M is modest relative to quarterly revenue of ~$370M, and with negative free cash flow in eight of the last ten quarters, the company may need to raise capital if losses persist. The liquidity position appears adequate for the near term, but it would be severely tested under a scenario of elevated medical utilization or a regulatory shock that reduces capitation rates. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate and the ability to access capital markets, as the current cushion provides limited room for error.
Misapplied SaaS Metrics Distort Reality
The most misapplied ratio for Agilon is EV/Sales, which at 0.24 appears cheap, but this ignores the negative gross margin, as reported in the valuation multiples, making the metric misleading for a risk-bearing entity.
Agilon's revenue is largely a pass-through of capitation payments to providers, so EV/Sales does not capture the true economic value generated. A more appropriate metric is the medical margin per member or the gross margin dollar per member, which reflects the spread between capitation revenue and medical claims. The negative gross margin indicates that each member currently destroys value, so a low EV/Sales multiple is not a sign of undervaluation but rather a reflection of the market's skepticism about the business model's viability. Investors should focus on the trajectory of gross margin and the ability to achieve positive medical margins, rather than traditional revenue multiples that are common for software companies.