Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 74.4x · EV/EBITDA 55.2x · ROE 13.1%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.9B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.3B | $2.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $388M | $488M | $272M | $214M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $930M | $1.0B | $357M | $447M | $232M | $165M |
| P/E Ratio → | 74.40 | 52.31 | 88.46 | 26.58 | 168.39 | 221.56 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 8.94 | 6.33 | 7.44 | 9.52 | 10.80 | 6.25 | 8.20 | 2.41 | 3.46 | 2.13 | 1.67 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.80 | 6.19 | 7.71 | 9.56 | 14.78 | 7.65 | 9.75 | 5.41 | 4.85 | 2.51 | 1.88 |
| P/FCF | 41.88 | 29.66 | 39.16 | 56.46 | 78.58 | 37.26 | 41.64 | 54.23 | 281.25 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 40.77 | 28.88 | 37.18 | 46.94 | 62.08 | 35.69 | 39.60 | 36.69 | 67.35 | 39.54 | 62.25 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.02 | 7.34 | 9.01 | 10.32 | 5.72 | 7.58 | 2.22 | 3.17 | 1.82 | 1.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 55.23 | 38.55 | 66.16 | 101.87 | 123.49 | 91.33 | — | — | 97.34 | 94.86 | 406.65 |
| EV / EBIT | 68.64 | 39.34 | 74.50 | 103.50 | 129.62 | 142.57 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.23 | 38.66 | 53.44 | 75.05 | 34.09 | 38.47 | 49.86 | 257.77 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.9% | 61.9% | 62.4% | 60.7% | 61.0% | 62.4% | 65.2% | 50.4% | 52.5% | 50.6% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 12.6% | 8.2% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 3.9% | -15.3% | -21.2% | -9.3% | -9.5% | -8.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.1% | 12.1% | 8.4% | 36.3% | 7.4% | 4.0% | -15.3% | -21.2% | -9.3% | -6.6% | -9.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.1% | 13.1% | 9.2% | 45.2% | 10.5% | 5.2% | -22.4% | -39.5% | -12.6% | -7.5% | -9.9% |
| ROA | 8.5% | 8.5% | 5.9% | 29.0% | 6.4% | 3.2% | -12.2% | -21.4% | -8.2% | -5.1% | -6.7% |
| ROIC | 12.8% | 12.8% | 9.5% | 14.4% | 20.3% | 12.4% | -44.7% | -50.9% | -15.3% | -13.6% | -13.4% |
| ROCE | 11.8% | 11.8% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 8.4% | 4.7% | -19.6% | -35.8% | -12.0% | -10.3% | -9.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.38 | 0.38 | 1.54 | 1.14 | 1.01 | 1.05 | — | — | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.30 | -0.10 | -0.51 | -0.66 | -0.65 | -0.74 | -0.44 | -0.40 | -0.37 | -0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.96 | -1.96 | -0.85 | -5.76 | -5.81 | -8.47 | — | — | -8.87 | -16.26 | -121.03 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.44 | -0.50 | -3.02 | -3.53 | -3.16 | -3.17 | -4.37 | -23.48 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 99.19 | 99.19 | 17.77 | — | — | 543.58 | -1059.45 | -3761.89 | -1293.30 | -1159.10 | -764.67 |
Net cash position: cash ($117M) exceeds total debt ($19M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 1.97 | 1.91 | 2.18 | 1.35 | 1.36 | 1.43 | 1.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.07 | 2.06 | 1.85 | 1.81 | 2.17 | 1.29 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 1.62 | 1.44 | 1.36 | 1.63 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 1.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 1.04 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | 16.18 | 16.18 | 20.03 | 20.32 | 7.90 | 8.80 | 40.61 | 20.53 | 32.76 | 31.49 | 28.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 57.76 | 47.74 | 48.77 | 45.37 | 60.25 | 74.76 | 86.27 | 77.54 | 46.97 | 44.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.3% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 3.8% | 0.6% | 0.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 3.4% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 0.4% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $28M | $28M | $27M | $26M | $25M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AGYS stock.
Agilysys, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 74.4x. The historical average is 46.0x. This places it at the 71th percentile of its historical range.
Agilysys, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 55.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 31.3x.
Agilysys, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.1%. The historical average is -1.0%.
Based on historical data, Agilysys, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 74.4x. This is at the 71th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Agilysys, Inc. has 61.9% gross margin and 12.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Agilysys, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from competition
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Priced for Perpetual Growth
AGYS trades at 83.7x trailing earnings and 62.4x EV/EBITDA, per recent filings, implying the market expects sustained double-digit subscription growth and margin expansion to justify the premium.
The forward P/E of 68.9x and forward EV/EBITDA of 32.6x suggest investors are paying for a steep growth trajectory, likely anticipating that the SaaS transition will drive recurring revenue to dominate the mix. Compared to the broader software peer group, AGYS commands a significant premium, which appears justified only if subscription growth remains above 20% and operating margins expand toward the 20%+ range. The absence of a PEG ratio limits growth-adjusted comparison, but the current multiple leaves little room for execution missteps.
Margin Expansion Tempered by Investment Cycle
Gross margin improved to 63.5% in Q1 FY2027 from 61.5% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, yet operating margin fell to 11.1% from 15.3% sequentially, indicating investment spending is absorbing gross profit gains.
The gross margin trend reflects a favorable mix shift toward subscription revenue, but the sequential drop in operating margin suggests that R&D and SG&A costs are rising faster than revenue, likely due to product development and sales expansion. Net margin of 10.3% in Q1 FY2027 is below the 14.8% seen in Q4 FY2026, highlighting that the company is in an investment phase. Investors should monitor whether these expenses translate into sustained revenue acceleration or merely compress margins without proportional growth.
Return on Capital Remains Modest Despite Asset-Light Model
ROIC averaged roughly 2.6% over the last ten quarters, as per financial statements, which is low for a software company, suggesting that the capital base is not yet generating outsized returns relative to its growth potential.
Despite an asset-light model with minimal capex, ROIC has been consistently below 4% on a quarterly basis, indicating that the company's investments in R&D and acquisitions have not yet translated into high returns on invested capital. The recent acquisition of Book4Time and increased goodwill (now 27.8% of total assets) may be dilutive to ROIC in the near term. If subscription revenue scales without proportional cost increases, ROIC could improve, but current levels suggest the market is pricing in future efficiency gains.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Seasonal Volatility
Cash conversion cycle improved to 36 days in Q1 FY2027 from 51 days in Q4 FY2026, as per financial statements, driven by faster collections, though DSO swings of 49 to 65 days indicate lumpy billing patterns.
The reduction in DSO from 65 to 49 days sequentially suggests improved collections, but the volatility across quarters points to project-based revenue recognition and large customer payments. DPO has remained relatively stable around 36-41 days, indicating consistent supplier terms. The overall CCC of 36 days is reasonable for a software company, but the quarterly swings highlight that working capital management is not yet a source of predictable cash flow.
Minimal Debt Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.05 in Q1 FY2027 from 0.28 a year earlier, as reported in SEC filings, and interest coverage of 155x indicates ample capacity to service obligations.
The company has aggressively deleveraged, with total debt down to $18.4M, leaving the balance sheet nearly debt-free. This fortress-like position provides dry powder for acquisitions or buybacks without straining liquidity. The high interest coverage ratio, though partly due to low debt, underscores that debt service is not a concern. However, the recent goodwill build from acquisitions suggests that future impairments could impact equity, though not leverage.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens with Cash Build
Current ratio improved to 1.74 in Q1 FY2027 from 1.11 a year earlier, as per financial statements, with cash more than doubling to $123.7M, indicating a robust short-term cushion.
The quick ratio of 1.67 suggests that even without inventory (which is minimal), the company can cover current liabilities comfortably. The cash build provides a buffer against operational shocks and supports continued investment in growth initiatives. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged hospitality downturn, the company could likely sustain operations without external financing, given its low fixed costs and recurring revenue base.
Outperforming PAR Technology on Profitability
AGYS generates positive net margins of 10.3% versus PAR Technology's -18.5%, as per recent financial data, and holds a superior ROIC of 3.2% versus -4.5%, indicating stronger operational execution.
While PAR Technology is a direct competitor in hospitality tech, AGYS's profitability metrics are significantly better, reflecting its focus on high-end resorts and casinos with sticky, integrated solutions. The gap in ROE (2.7% vs -8.7%) underscores AGYS's ability to generate returns despite a larger capital base. However, both companies face similar competitive pressures from payment-led providers, and AGYS's premium valuation implies the market expects it to maintain this lead.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA Overstates Value
EV/EBITDA of 62.4x, as per recent filings, is commonly used for AGYS but obscures the impact of stock-based compensation and capitalized software costs, which inflate EBITDA relative to true cash earnings.
For a company transitioning to SaaS, EBITDA can be misleading because it excludes stock-based compensation (SBC) and treats capitalized R&D as an investment rather than an expense. AGYS's SBC of $6.0M in Q1 FY2027 alone represents a significant drag on cash earnings. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Unlevered Free Cash Flow or EV/Sales, which better captures the recurring revenue quality and cash generation. Investors should adjust for SBC and capitalized software to avoid overpaying for accounting earnings rather than economic value.