Free cash flow burn improved 50% from -$63.6M in 2024Q2 to -$32.1M in 2026Q2, but cumulative FCF over ten quarters was -$395.6M, with operating cash flow averaging 0.72 of net losses and minimal capex of $0.1M quarterly.
Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (ALLO) cash flow statement — 9-year operating, investing & financing cash flows
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 |
|---|
| Cash from Operations | -102.2M | -149.25M | -200.3M | -237.73M | -220.52M | -184.81M | -115.09M | -137.35M | -44.65M | 0 |
| Operating CF Margin % | - | - | -910454.55% | -250245.26% | -141358.33% | -161.99% | - | - | - | - |
| Operating CF Growth % | 151.12% | 25.49% | 15.75% | -7.81% | -19.32% | -60.58% | 16.2% | -207.59% | - | - |
| Net Income | -165.49M | -190.89M | -257.59M | -327.26M | -332.63M | -257M | -250.22M | -184.59M | -211.5M | -24K |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 11.67M | 12.36M | 13.64M | 14.2M | 14.29M | 10.45M | 7.59M | 5.03M | 1.5M | 0 |
| Stock-Based Compensation | 37.49M | 37.64M | 51.74M | 65.95M | 83.6M | 80.82M | 65.26M | 46.06M | 18.57M | 0 |
| Deferred Taxes | 0 | 0 | 443K | 0 | 8.08M | 10.4M | 4.4M | -331K | -117K | 0 |
| Other Non-Cash Items | -3.32M | 2.52M | 16.26M | 24.69M | 2.43M | 2.61M | 3.96M | 3.36M | 134.81M | 0 |
| Working Capital Changes | 17.46M | -10.88M | -24.8M | -15.3M | 3.71M | -32.09M | 53.92M | -6.88M | 12.1M | 24K |
| Change in Receivables | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Inventory | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Payables | 1.22M | -1.23M | -503K | -7.5M | 4.87M | -767K | 615K | -985K | 8.8M | 0 |
| Cash from Investing | -131.6M | 95.56M | 75.69M | 163.29M | 106.16M | 163.66M | -505.12M | 164.08M | -632.8M | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures | -402K | -386K | -694K | -1.52M | -5.19M | -21.45M | -65.96M | -50.79M | -3.23M | 0 |
| CapEx % of Revenue | 8.66% | - | 3154.55% | 1595.79% | 3327.56% | 18.8% | - | - | - | - |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -111.35M | -17.71M | 439.17M | -5.08M | 0 | 0 |
| Investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Investing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111.35M | 0 | -439.17M | 0 | -2.1M | 0 |
| Cash from Financing | 220.09M | 30.16M | 116.67M | 95.69M | 2.95M | 11.96M | 633.59M | 58.96M | 771.18M | 0 |
| Debt Issued (Net) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 116.84M | 0 |
| Equity Issued (Net) | 220.09M | 23.25M | 114.39M | 91.11M | 2.95M | 11.96M | 621.93M | 54.22M | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share Repurchases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Financing | 0 | 6.91M | 2.28M | 4.58M | 0 | 0 | 11.66M | 4.74M | 654.34M | 0 |
| Net Change in Cash | -13.71M | -23.53M | -7.94M | 21.25M | -111.41M | -9.19M | 13.38M | 85.69M | 93.73M | 0 |
| Free Cash Flow | -102.6M | -149.63M | -200.99M | -239.25M | -225.71M | -206.26M | -181.05M | -188.14M | -47.89M | 0 |
| FCF Margin % | -2211.16% | - | -913609.09% | -251841.05% | -144685.9% | -180.79% | - | - | - | - |
| FCF Growth % | 40.9% | 25.55% | 15.99% | -6% | -9.43% | -13.92% | 3.77% | -292.89% | - | - |
| FCF per Share | -0.31 | -0.68 | -1.03 | -1.52 | -1.58 | -1.52 | -1.50 | -1.86 | -0.53 | - |
| FCF Conversion (FCF/Net Income) | 0.62x | 0.78x | 0.78x | 0.73x | 0.65x | 1.02x | 0.46x | 0.74x | 0.21x | - |
| Interest Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taxes Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALLO stock.
Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (ALLO) generated $-149.2M in net cash from operating activities in 2025. This reflects the cash generated directly from core business operations.
Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (ALLO) reported negative free cash flow of $149.6M in 2025, indicating capital requirements exceeded cash from operations.
Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (ALLO) spent $0.4M on capital expenditures in 2025. CapEx represents the cash invested in physical assets like property, plant, and equipment to maintain or grow the business.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway insufficient
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cash Conversion Masked by Working Capital
Operating cash flow averaged 0.72 of net losses over ten quarters, but working capital swings distort the signal; 2026Q1 OCF/NI was 0.30 versus 0.96 in 2024Q2, per reported cash flow statements.
The gap between net income and operating cash flow is primarily driven by non-cash stock-based compensation and working capital timing, not by operational efficiency. In 2026Q1, a positive working capital change of $18.4M inflated operating cash flow relative to the loss, while 2026Q2's negative $18.4M swing reversed that effect, suggesting the underlying cash burn is more consistent than quarterly OCF/NI ratios imply. Investors should monitor the ex-working-capital cash burn, which appears to be running at roughly $30-40M per quarter, to gauge true liquidity consumption.
Free Cash Flow Burn Moderating but Still Severe
Free cash flow improved from -$63.6M in 2024Q2 to -$32.1M in 2026Q2, a 50% reduction, yet cumulative FCF over ten quarters was -$395.6M, according to cash flow data.
The trajectory shows a clear deceleration in cash burn, likely reflecting cost-cutting measures and a strategic pivot, but the absolute level remains high relative to the company's cash balance. With only $51.7M in cash, the current quarterly FCF of -$32.1M implies a runway of less than two quarters, assuming no additional financing or partnership inflows. This suggests that the company's survival is contingent on securing new capital or achieving a significant reduction in operating costs.
Minimal CapEx Masks Manufacturing Investment
Capital expenditures averaged just $0.1M per quarter over the last ten quarters, representing less than 1% of revenue, yet the company's CellForge facility suggests hidden capital intensity, per reported cash flow statements.
The near-zero CapEx is striking for a company that has invested heavily in internal manufacturing, indicating that either the facility is already built out or that capital costs are being absorbed elsewhere, possibly through operating leases or collaboration agreements. This low capital intensity may not persist if the company needs to scale manufacturing for late-stage trials or commercial launch. Investors should monitor whether future CapEx increases are required to support the ALLO-316 program, which could accelerate cash burn.
Working Capital Swings Distort Cash Flow
Working capital changes ranged from -$18.4M to +$21.2M over the past ten quarters, creating significant quarterly volatility in operating cash flow, as reported in the cash flow statements.
The large swings in working capital, particularly in 2026Q1 and 2026Q2, appear to be driven by timing of payments and receipts related to collaborations and clinical trial expenses, rather than operational efficiency. These swings obscure the underlying cash burn, which is more stable when adjusted for working capital. Analysts should focus on the ex-working-capital operating cash flow, which has been consistently negative in the $30-40M range, to assess the company's true liquidity needs.
No Capital Returns, Only Cash Consumption
Allogene has paid no dividends and repurchased only $450K in stock over the last ten quarters, with all cash directed to R&D and operations, according to cash flow data.
Capital deployment is entirely focused on funding the clinical pipeline, with no shareholder returns, which is typical for a pre-commercial biotech. The negligible buyback in 2026Q2 is immaterial and likely reflects a minor offset to dilution from stock-based compensation. The company's capital allocation strategy appears to be preservation of cash, but the high burn rate and low cash balance suggest that future deployment will be constrained by the need to raise capital.
Cumulative Losses Exceed Cash Burn
Over the last ten quarters, cumulative net losses were -$533.3M versus cumulative operating cash flow of -$394.5M, a divergence of $138.8M, per reported cash flow statements.
The cumulative gap between net income and operating cash flow is largely attributable to non-cash charges like stock-based compensation and depreciation, which totaled approximately $100M over the period. This divergence indicates that the company's cash burn is less severe than its accounting losses, but the absolute magnitude of both remains substantial. The persistent gap also suggests that the company is not generating any cash from operations, and the reliance on external financing is likely to continue.
What Could Invalidate the Base Case
The cash flow statement obscures the true liquidity picture: SBC adds back ~$10M quarterly, but the $51.7M cash balance may not reflect undisclosed credit facilities or imminent dilutive financing, per reported figures.
While the reported cash burn appears severe, the cash flow statement may understate available liquidity if the company has access to undrawn credit lines or partnership milestones not visible in the TTM data. Conversely, the low cash balance could force a dilutive equity raise at unfavorable terms, which would further pressure existing shareholders. Investors should scrutinize the footnotes for off-balance-sheet arrangements and any subsequent financing announcements to assess the true runway.