Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 54.6x · EV/EBITDA 44.6x · ROE 35.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $375.1B | $184.8B | $155.6B | $110.9B | $78.7B | $125.6B | $56.3B | $52.7B | $33.2B | $61.5B | $32.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $374.9B | $184.6B | $154.1B | $110.8B | $82.5B | $126.3B | $56.6B | $54.8B | $35.1B | $61.7B | $31.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 54.56 | 26.41 | 21.66 | 16.19 | 12.06 | 21.35 | 15.55 | 19.48 | 10.93 | 17.88 | 18.61 |
| P/S Ratio | 13.22 | 6.52 | 5.72 | 4.18 | 3.05 | 5.45 | 3.27 | 3.60 | 1.99 | 4.18 | 2.95 |
| P/B Ratio | 18.70 | 9.05 | 8.19 | 6.79 | 6.45 | 10.25 | 5.32 | 6.41 | 4.85 | 6.57 | 4.43 |
| P/FCF | 65.83 | 32.44 | 20.78 | 14.61 | 17.06 | 26.31 | 16.63 | 18.77 | 10.49 | 18.83 | 14.45 |
| P/OCF | 47.14 | 23.23 | 17.93 | 12.75 | 14.57 | 23.08 | 14.79 | 16.22 | 8.77 | 17.03 | 12.97 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.51 | 5.67 | 4.18 | 3.20 | 5.48 | 3.29 | 3.75 | 2.10 | 4.20 | 2.95 |
| EV / EBITDA | 44.64 | 21.98 | 18.66 | 13.57 | 10.02 | 17.35 | 11.94 | 14.77 | 7.09 | 14.22 | 12.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 45.23 | 19.35 | 18.35 | 13.93 | 10.54 | 18.03 | 12.85 | 15.64 | 7.57 | 15.38 | 14.72 |
| EV / FCF | — | 32.40 | 20.59 | 14.59 | 17.89 | 26.46 | 16.74 | 19.54 | 11.08 | 18.92 | 14.42 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 48.7% | 47.5% | 46.7% | 46.5% | 47.3% | 44.7% | 43.7% | 45.0% | 45.0% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 29.2% | 28.9% | 28.9% | 30.2% | 29.9% | 25.4% | 22.9% | 26.9% | 26.8% | 19.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 24.7% | 24.7% | 26.4% | 25.9% | 25.3% | 25.5% | 21.0% | 18.5% | 18.2% | 23.9% | 15.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 35.5% | 35.5% | 40.6% | 48.0% | 53.4% | 51.6% | 38.5% | 35.9% | 37.5% | 42.5% | 23.2% |
| ROA | 19.8% | 19.8% | 22.0% | 23.9% | 24.8% | 24.4% | 17.5% | 14.8% | 16.4% | 20.7% | 11.5% |
| ROIC | 32.9% | 32.9% | 34.9% | 35.6% | 40.2% | 43.2% | 30.7% | 26.3% | 36.7% | 35.2% | 22.3% |
| ROCE | 30.6% | 30.6% | 31.9% | 35.8% | 40.1% | 36.9% | 26.9% | 23.7% | 30.9% | 30.0% | 19.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.20 | 1.43 | 1.07 | 1.22 | 1.31 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.01 | -0.07 | -0.01 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.03 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.17 | -0.02 | 0.47 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.07 | -0.03 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.03 | -0.19 | -0.02 | 0.83 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 0.09 | -0.04 |
| Interest Coverage | 35.46 | 35.46 | 34.00 | 33.42 | 34.33 | 29.69 | 18.36 | 14.79 | 19.79 | 20.27 | 13.99 |
Net cash position: cash ($7.2B) exceeds total debt ($7.0B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.61 | 2.61 | 2.51 | 2.60 | 2.16 | 2.54 | 3.00 | 2.30 | 2.70 | 3.14 | 2.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.82 | 1.35 | 1.86 | 2.12 | 1.51 | 1.75 | 2.43 | 1.74 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.12 | 0.93 | 0.35 | 0.86 | 1.29 | 0.81 | 1.03 | 1.77 | 1.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.46 | 2.46 | 2.63 | 2.47 | 2.33 | 2.82 | 2.44 | 2.37 | 2.47 | 2.76 | 3.08 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 68.62 | 71.91 | 76.77 | 92.42 | 87.77 | 66.01 | 65.99 | 52.92 | 58.06 | 76.84 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 0.7% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.8% | 19.8% | 16.6% | 14.2% | 13.4% | 14.2% | 21.7% | 28.5% | 19.9% | 12.2% | 25.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 6.2% | 8.3% | 4.7% | 6.4% | 5.1% | 9.1% | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| FCF Yield | 1.5% | 3.1% | 4.8% | 6.8% | 5.9% | 3.8% | 6.0% | 5.3% | 9.5% | 5.3% | 6.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 7.8% | 3.0% | 1.2% | 4.6% | 15.9% | 1.9% | 5.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.7% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 2.9% | 8.9% | 3.7% | 2.6% | 6.0% | 17.7% | 2.6% | 7.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $808M | $834M | $845M | $877M | $919M | $923M | $945M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMAT stock.
Applied Materials, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 54.6x. The historical average is 29.8x. This places it at the 86th percentile of its historical range.
Applied Materials, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 44.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.8x.
Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 35.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 22.8%.
Based on historical data, Applied Materials, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 54.6x. This is at the 86th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Applied Materials, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.36% with a payout ratio of 19.8%.
Applied Materials, Inc. has 48.7% gross margin and 29.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Applied Materials, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
China export control overhang
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Reflects AI-Driven Growth
Applied Materials trades at a forward P/E of 35.77 and EV/EBITDA of 26.80, a premium to its own history but a discount to ASML, suggesting the market is pricing in sustained growth from advanced node transitions without fully awarding a platform multiple.
The current forward P/E of 35.77, while elevated, is below the trailing P/E of 52.93, indicating the market expects significant earnings growth to compress the multiple. Compared to ASML's forward P/E of 59.06, AMAT trades at a notable discount, which may reflect its more cyclical hardware exposure versus ASML's monopoly in EUV lithography. The PEG ratio of 3.08 suggests the market is pricing in above-average growth, but the valuation is not yet at levels that would imply a full re-rating to a non-cyclical platform business.
Margin Expansion Driven by Mix Shift
Gross margins have expanded to 50.3% in 2026Q3 from a 47.3% baseline in 2024, while operating margins reached 33.7%, indicating successful pricing power and a favorable mix shift toward higher-value integrated solutions for advanced nodes.
The 300 basis point expansion in gross margin over ten quarters suggests the company is successfully passing through cost inflation and capturing value from the increased complexity of materials engineering at sub-3nm nodes. Operating margin expansion to 33.7% demonstrates strong operating leverage, as the high fixed-cost R&D base is spread over a rapidly growing revenue base. The net margin of 27.8% remains robust, though the gap between operating and net margin indicates a meaningful tax burden and non-operating items.
ROIC Recovery Amidst Capital Intensity
ROIC has recovered to 9.1% in 2026Q3 from a low of 6.2% in 2025Q4, but remains well below peer levels like ASML's 84.2%, suggesting the company's capital-intensive model and lower asset turnover constrain returns despite strong profitability.
The ROIC recovery is driven by margin expansion rather than improved capital efficiency, as asset turnover has remained stable around 0.20-0.22. The significant gap versus ASML's 84.2% ROIC highlights a structural difference: AMAT's business model requires substantial investment in R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, whereas ASML benefits from extreme pricing power on its monopoly lithography systems. The ROE of 10.2% is also modest compared to peers like KLAC's 85.4%, indicating that shareholder returns are being diluted by the large equity base built from retained earnings.
Working Capital Swings Mask Underlying Efficiency
The cash conversion cycle has improved to 154 days in 2026Q3 from 179 days in 2024Q2, driven primarily by a reduction in days inventory outstanding from 148 to 130, suggesting better inventory management amid strong demand.
The improvement in CCC is a positive signal for working capital efficiency, but the volatility in DSO (65-79 days) and DIO (130-152 days) over the period indicates that cash conversion is heavily influenced by the timing of large equipment shipments and customer acceptance. The DPO of 46 days is relatively stable, suggesting the company has consistent terms with its suppliers. The overall trend toward a shorter cycle is supportive of free cash flow generation, but investors should monitor whether this is sustainable or a function of favorable shipment timing.
Conservative Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
The debt-to-equity ratio has improved to 0.29 from 0.35 over ten quarters, while interest coverage remains exceptionally strong at 43.75x, indicating a fortress balance sheet that provides significant dry powder for strategic investments or shareholder returns.
The low leverage profile is a deliberate strategic choice, as evidenced by the consistent reduction in D/E despite rising absolute debt levels from $6.0B to $7.3B. The interest coverage ratio of 43.75x is among the highest in the industry, suggesting that debt service is not a constraint and the company could comfortably take on additional leverage if a compelling acquisition opportunity arose. This conservative posture contrasts with peers like KLAC (D/E of 0.93) and provides a buffer against cyclical downturns in semiconductor equipment demand.
The Misapplied Cyclical Multiple
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric to Applied Materials, as it obscures the growing, higher-margin, and more predictable recurring revenue stream from the Applied Global Services segment, which should warrant a premium to pure-play cyclical hardware peers.
Analysts often value AMAT using a cyclical P/E framework, comparing it to other semi-cap equipment stocks. However, this fails to account for the structural shift in revenue mix toward the AGS segment, which provides subscription-like maintenance and parts revenue with higher margins and lower volatility. A more appropriate valuation framework would be a blended multiple that weights the cyclical Semiconductor Systems business at a lower multiple and the stable AGS business at a higher, software-like multiple. Ignoring this mix shift risks systematically undervaluing the company's improved earnings quality and cash flow durability.