Free cash flow burn has stabilized at -$31.5M in 2026Q2, down 53% from 2024Q2, but cumulative net losses of $531.1M exceed operating cash outflows of $359.1M, and no capital returns have been made, indicating a survival-focused allocation.
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) cash flow statement — 7-year operating, investing & financing cash flows
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 |
|---|
| Cash from Operations | -126.58M | -123.34M | -167.65M | 11.92M | -179.87M | -74.8M | -36.7M | -10.69M |
| Operating CF Margin % | - | - | -191.88% | 3.13% | -809.14% | - | -5645.69% | -749.44% |
| Operating CF Growth % | 62.59% | 26.43% | -1506.55% | 106.63% | -140.47% | -103.83% | -243.38% | - |
| Net Income | -152.09M | -144.74M | -301.74M | 49.27M | -198.38M | -87.93M | -42.28M | -13.72M |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 369K | 525K | 904K | 1.09M | 487K | 52K | 1K | 0 |
| Stock-Based Compensation | 27.9M | 27.64M | 33.04M | 37.16M | 21.71M | 3.14M | 243K | 108K |
| Deferred Taxes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Non-Cash Items | 1.53M | -5.7M | 145.99M | -9.94M | -2.06M | 5.35M | 2.74M | -583K |
| Working Capital Changes | -4.28M | -1.08M | -45.83M | -65.66M | -1.64M | 4.59M | 2.6M | 3.5M |
| Change in Receivables | -35K | 383K | 39.6M | -24.74M | -15.31M | -144K | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Inventory | 0 | 0 | -9.25M | -73.13M | -9.77M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Payables | 2.26M | 580K | -19.1M | 15.88M | 1.85M | 670K | 1.42M | 1.28M |
| Cash from Investing | -78.83M | 14.04M | 75.65M | 92.05M | -238.99M | -46.41M | -151K | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures | -4.14M | -138K | -157K | -1.24M | -2.53M | -353K | -151K | 0 |
| CapEx % of Revenue | - | - | 0.18% | 0.33% | 11.36% | - | 23.23% | - |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 236.46M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Investing | 0 | 0 | -36.2M | 0 | -236.46M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash from Financing | 196.09M | 257.03M | 348K | 3.54M | 431.79M | 158.51M | 46.82M | 668K |
| Debt Issued (Net) | 191.11M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.9M | 16.82M | 641K |
| Equity Issued (Net) | 268.48M | 260.39M | 2.13M | 6.86M | 432.45M | 135M | 29.96M | 27K |
| Dividends Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share Repurchases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Financing | -263.5M | -3.36M | -1.78M | -3.31M | -658K | -2.39M | 48K | 0 |
| Net Change in Cash | -8.76M | 148.8M | -92.08M | 107.67M | 12.87M | 37.31M | 9.97M | 3.09M |
| Free Cash Flow | -126.72M | -123.48M | -167.8M | 10.68M | -182.4M | -75.15M | -36.85M | -10.69M |
| FCF Margin % | - | - | -192.06% | 2.8% | -820.5% | - | -5668.92% | -749.44% |
| FCF Growth % | 23.52% | 26.41% | -1671.49% | 105.85% | -142.7% | -103.95% | -244.79% | - |
| FCF per Share | -1.14 | -1.31 | -2.46 | 0.15 | -2.74 | -1.30 | -0.65 | -0.19 |
| FCF Conversion (FCF/Net Income) | 0.83x | 0.85x | 0.56x | 0.24x | 0.91x | 0.85x | 0.87x | 0.72x |
| Interest Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taxes Paid | 0 | 0 | 708K | 0 | 27K | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMLX stock.
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) generated $-123.3M in net cash from operating activities in 2025. This reflects the cash generated directly from core business operations.
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) reported negative free cash flow of $123.5M in 2025, indicating capital requirements exceeded cash from operations.
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) spent $0.1M on capital expenditures in 2025. CapEx represents the cash invested in physical assets like property, plant, and equipment to maintain or grow the business.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway without revenue
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cash Conversion Distorted by Restructuring
In 2026Q2, AMLX's operating cash outflow of $31.4M was 72% of its net loss, but this ratio is distorted by one-time charges and working capital swings, as per recent SEC filings.
The OCF/NI ratio has fluctuated wildly, from 0.00 in 2024Q1 to 1.57 in 2024Q4, reflecting the lumpy nature of restructuring payments and trial wind-down costs. The recent quarters show a more stable ratio around 0.7-0.9, suggesting that cash burn is now more aligned with the reported net loss, but the absence of revenue means this is purely a measure of cash consumption, not earnings quality.
Free Cash Flow Burn Stabilizing
Quarterly FCF burn has narrowed from -$66.7M in 2024Q2 to -$31.5M in 2026Q2, a 53% reduction, as reported in financial statements, reflecting aggressive cost cuts post-withdrawal.
The FCF trajectory shows a clear downward trend in cash burn, but it remains substantial relative to the $226.6M cash balance. With no revenue, the FCF margin is undefined, and the company is entirely dependent on its cash reserves to fund operations. The stabilization suggests management has successfully downsized, but the runway is still limited to roughly five quarters at the current burn rate.
Minimal Capital Expenditure
CapEx has been negligible, averaging under $1M per quarter, with the largest outlay being $4.0M in 2026Q1, as per quarterly filings, indicating a shift to a virtual clinical-stage model.
The near-zero CapEx underscores that AMLX is no longer investing in commercial manufacturing or infrastructure, consistent with its pivot back to a pure R&D organization. This low capital intensity means the primary cash drain is operating expenses, particularly R&D and SG&A, rather than fixed asset replacement. Investors should monitor whether any future CapEx is needed for clinical trial expansion or if the company can maintain this lean asset base.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Wind-Down
Working capital changes have been volatile, swinging from -$26.7M in 2024Q4 to +$10.0M in 2025Q2, as reported in cash flow statements, likely due to inventory write-offs and payment timing.
The working capital adjustments are not indicative of operational efficiency but rather the unwinding of commercial operations. The positive swings in some quarters suggest cash inflows from settling liabilities or collecting receivables, while negative swings reflect payments for restructuring and trial obligations. As the company stabilizes into a clinical-stage entity, these swings should diminish, but they currently add noise to the cash flow analysis.
No Capital Returns, All Cash Reserved
AMLX has paid no dividends and made no buybacks over the past ten quarters, with all cash conserved for operations, as per financial statements, reflecting a survival-focused capital allocation.
The absence of any capital returns is expected for a company in a cash preservation mode. The only deployment is operational burn, which is necessary to fund the ORION and HELIOS trials. The lack of acquisitions or debt paydown further confirms that management is hoarding cash to extend the runway. Investors should watch for any strategic deployment, such as a partnership or licensing deal, that could alter this conservative stance.
Cumulative Losses Exceed Cash Burn
Over the last ten quarters, cumulative net losses of $531.1M exceed cumulative operating cash outflows of $359.1M, as per reported figures, indicating significant non-cash charges and timing differences.
The gap between net income and operating cash flow is substantial, with non-cash items like stock-based compensation and depreciation totaling roughly $60M over the period. This divergence suggests that the economic cash drain is less severe than the accounting losses, but it does not change the fact that the company is consuming cash at an unsustainable rate. The cumulative cash burn of $359M highlights the urgency of reaching clinical milestones or securing additional financing.
What the Cash Flow Statement Obscures
The cash flow statement may understate the true cash burn due to stock-based compensation of $8.3M in 2026Q2 and potential accelerated vesting from layoffs, as per recent filings.
While SBC is a non-cash expense, it represents real dilution to shareholders, and the cash flow statement does not capture this cost. Additionally, the timing of clinical trial payments and restructuring charges could mask the underlying burn rate. Investors should adjust for these items to assess the sustainable cash consumption, which may be higher than reported operating cash outflows suggest.