Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 87.9x · EV/EBITDA 13.3x · ROE 1208.4%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.2B | $4.1B | $2.4B | $1.1B | $300M | $727M | $681M | $637M | $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $8.6B | $6.5B | $4.9B | $3.7B | $3.1B | $3.4B | $3.3B | $3.3B | $4.2B | $3.3B | $3.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 87.86 | 57.27 | — | — | — | 68.43 | 7.49 | — | — | 11.40 | 12.05 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.04 | 1.36 | 0.88 | 0.45 | 0.14 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 1.04 | 1.85 | 2.46 |
| P/B Ratio | 1052.89 | 686.31 | — | 17.44 | 1.44 | 1.98 | 1.91 | 1.84 | 1.34 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 22.87 | 15.16 | 11.12 | 3.87 | — | 3.75 | 2.15 | — | 11.24 | 15.95 | — |
| P/OCF | 18.16 | 12.04 | 8.29 | 3.09 | 4.61 | 3.01 | 1.80 | 373.46 | 6.88 | 8.17 | 21.76 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.16 | 1.76 | 1.56 | 1.41 | 1.60 | 1.68 | 2.00 | 2.53 | 3.21 | 3.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.30 | 10.08 | 10.15 | 8.59 | 21.48 | 8.69 | 10.22 | — | 35.67 | 11.42 | 11.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.32 | 17.14 | 24.21 | 13.74 | 15.60 | 20.01 | 30.29 | — | — | 13.71 | 13.60 |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.15 | 22.40 | 13.49 | — | 17.29 | 10.52 | — | 27.42 | 27.71 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 37.6% | 36.5% | 36.1% | 35.8% | 36.7% | 31.5% | 21.7% | 43.1% | 50.9% | 58.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 14.0% | 8.9% | 8.5% | -4.3% | 7.3% | 4.6% | -15.3% | -1.2% | 23.7% | 28.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.4% | 2.4% | -4.2% | -3.5% | -5.9% | 0.5% | 4.6% | -22.3% | -10.2% | 16.2% | 20.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1208.4% | 1208.4% | -1394.3% | -62.2% | -45.1% | 2.9% | 25.9% | -44.3% | -37.2% | — | — |
| ROA | 2.0% | 2.0% | -3.4% | -2.3% | -3.4% | 0.3% | 2.4% | -9.0% | -6.0% | 13.1% | 18.6% |
| ROIC | 13.0% | 13.0% | 7.3% | 5.3% | -2.4% | 3.8% | 2.3% | -5.5% | -0.6% | 18.1% | 24.3% |
| ROCE | 16.4% | 16.4% | 10.0% | 7.2% | -3.0% | 4.6% | 2.8% | -7.2% | -0.8% | 24.0% | 32.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 458.91 | 458.91 | — | 44.87 | 13.62 | 7.84 | 8.41 | 7.99 | 2.09 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.23 | 4.23 | 5.34 | 6.34 | 19.59 | 7.45 | 9.18 | — | 22.86 | 5.10 | 3.77 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 406.78 | — | 43.37 | 13.49 | 7.16 | 7.45 | 7.55 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.75 | 3.75 | 5.11 | 6.13 | 19.41 | 6.81 | 8.14 | — | 21.05 | 4.85 | 3.68 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.99 | 11.28 | 9.62 | — | 13.54 | 8.38 | — | 16.18 | 11.76 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.58 | 1.58 | 0.79 | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.23 | 0.75 | -0.31 | -0.41 | 3.41 | 4.89 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.17 | 2.17 | 1.41 | 1.63 | 1.88 | 2.24 | 2.29 | 2.20 | 2.32 | 2.60 | 3.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 1.17 | 1.52 | 1.57 | 1.51 | 1.50 | 1.64 | 2.04 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.11 | 3.11 | 2.90 | 2.63 | 2.68 | 2.71 | 2.78 | 3.34 | 2.07 | 1.79 | 1.58 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 113.64 | 101.34 | 98.46 | 122.39 | 121.12 | 117.05 | 135.64 | 124.08 | 124.07 | 141.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.6% | 19.6% | 8.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 223.8% | 96.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.1% | 1.7% | — | — | — | 1.5% | 13.3% | — | — | 8.8% | 8.3% |
| FCF Yield | 4.4% | 6.6% | 9.0% | 25.9% | — | 26.7% | 46.6% | — | 8.9% | 6.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 10.6% | 19.6% | 8.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $325M | $309M | $176M | $151M | $152M | $149M | $132M | $127M | $115M | $189M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMRX stock.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 87.9x. The historical average is 34.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.4x.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 1208.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -26.7%.
Based on historical data, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 87.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has 37.6% gross margin and 14.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and interest burden
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masks Earnings Fragility
Gross margin improved to 42.0% in 2026Q2 from 36.5% in 2025Q4, per financial statements, yet net margin of 7.2% remains thin due to heavy interest costs, suggesting operational gains are partially offset by leverage.
The sequential gross margin expansion of over 500 basis points indicates a favorable product mix shift toward specialty and biosimilar products, which carry higher pricing power than commodity generics. However, operating margin of 18.3% in 2026Q2, while strong, is still below the levels needed to generate meaningful net income after interest expense, as evidenced by the interest coverage ratio of only 2.65x. The net margin of 7.2% in 2026Q2, though improved from 4.3% in 2025Q4, remains vulnerable to any rise in interest rates or working capital strain, implying that the true earning power of the business is still constrained by its capital structure.
Thin Equity Distorts Return Metrics
ROIC improved to 4.2% in 2026Q2 from 3.6% in 2025Q4, per reported data, but ROE of 162.4% is inflated by a minimal equity base, obscuring the modest returns on invested capital.
The extreme ROE figure is a mathematical artifact of a near-zero equity base, which turned positive only recently at $33.0M in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data. ROIC, at 4.2%, is a more reliable measure of economic return, yet it remains below the cost of capital, suggesting that the company is not yet creating value on a risk-adjusted basis. The improvement in ROIC from 2.3% in 2024Q4 to 4.2% in 2026Q2 indicates that operational efficiency is gradually recovering, but the pace is slow relative to the debt burden, implying that shareholders' equity is being rebuilt from a deficit and returns are still subpar.
Working Capital Drain Threatens Cash Flow
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 193 days in 2026Q2 from 168 days in 2025Q4, per financial statements, driven by rising DSO and DIO, while operating cash flow turned negative, signaling deteriorating working capital efficiency.
The cash conversion cycle has expanded by 25 days over two quarters, with DSO rising to 110 days and DIO to 130 days in 2026Q2, per reported figures. This suggests that the company is tying up more cash in receivables and inventory, likely due to the biosimilar buildout and extended payment terms from government customers. The negative operating cash flow of -$19.3M in 2026Q2, despite net income of $57.7M, underscores the severity of the working capital drain, which may indicate that the company is funding growth through cash reserves rather than generating organic cash, a trend that warrants close monitoring.
Leverage Overhang Persists Despite Equity Rebuild
Debt-to-equity fell to 23.87 in 2026Q2 from 458.91% in 2025Q4, per balance sheet data, but total debt remains near $2.8B, and interest coverage of 2.65x leaves little room for rate hikes.
The dramatic decline in D/E is primarily due to the equity base turning positive, not a reduction in absolute debt, which has stayed stable around $2.8B. Interest coverage improved to 2.65x in 2026Q2 from 1.98x in 2025Q4, but this is still thin, meaning that a 100 basis point increase in interest rates could consume a significant portion of operating income. The company's high leverage is a strategic overhang that limits financial flexibility, and while the equity rebuild is a positive sign, the retained earnings deficit of -$415.1M indicates that the balance sheet remains vulnerable to any earnings shock.
Liquidity Improves but Cash Buffer Thin
Current ratio improved to 2.20 in 2026Q2 from 1.33 in 2024Q2, per financial statements, but cash of $127.6M is modest against $2.8B in debt, suggesting limited cushion under stress.
The current ratio has strengthened significantly, and the quick ratio of 1.44 in 2026Q2 indicates that the company can cover short-term obligations without relying on inventory sales. However, the absolute cash balance is small relative to the debt load, and the negative operating cash flow in the last two quarters suggests that liquidity could deteriorate quickly if working capital trends persist. The company's ability to weather a severe downturn or an interest rate spike is questionable, as the cash buffer is insufficient to cover debt service for an extended period, implying that refinancing risk remains elevated.
ROE Misleads on True Value Creation
ROE of 162.4% in 2026Q2, per reported data, is often misapplied to Amneal, but it is distorted by a thin equity base and does not reflect sustainable returns; ROIC is the more appropriate metric.
The extreme ROE is a result of a near-zero equity base, which turned positive only recently, and it does not indicate operational excellence. Investors should focus on ROIC, which at 4.2% in 2026Q2 is still below the cost of capital, suggesting that the company is not yet generating economic value. The high leverage amplifies ROE, but it also increases financial risk, so using ROE as a performance metric can lead to an overestimation of the company's profitability. A more accurate assessment would adjust for the equity base and consider the interest burden, making ROIC and interest coverage more relevant for evaluating Amneal's true earning power.