Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 45.9x · EV/EBITDA 40.2x · ROE 31.4%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $215.1B | $167.2B | $141.6B | $74.7B | $38.4B | $45.9B | $23.1B | $16.4B | $17.0B | $18.6B | $7.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $213.1B | $165.2B | $138.8B | $72.8B | $37.8B | $45.3B | $22.3B | $15.4B | $16.4B | $17.8B | $6.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 45.94 | 47.65 | 49.57 | 35.68 | 28.36 | 54.45 | 36.32 | 19.26 | 51.95 | 44.61 | 37.81 |
| P/S Ratio | 18.09 | 18.56 | 20.22 | 12.75 | 8.77 | 15.57 | 9.96 | 6.82 | 7.92 | 11.30 | 6.28 |
| P/B Ratio | 17.61 | 13.51 | 14.17 | 10.35 | 7.86 | 11.54 | 6.95 | 5.68 | 7.95 | 11.19 | 6.40 |
| P/FCF | 42.86 | 39.31 | 38.52 | 37.35 | 85.69 | 48.25 | 32.08 | 17.36 | 35.54 | 30.18 | 64.42 |
| P/OCF | 49.19 | 38.23 | 38.18 | 36.72 | 77.93 | 45.18 | 31.41 | 17.08 | 33.86 | 29.45 | 53.92 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 18.34 | 19.82 | 12.41 | 8.62 | 15.38 | 9.61 | 6.40 | 7.63 | 10.80 | 5.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 40.18 | 42.05 | 46.18 | 31.25 | 23.76 | 46.49 | 30.30 | 18.39 | 54.55 | 36.22 | 24.93 |
| EV / EBIT | 55.26 | 38.87 | 42.52 | 30.04 | 23.88 | 48.70 | 31.83 | 19.14 | 56.33 | 37.23 | 26.73 |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.85 | 37.77 | 36.38 | 84.29 | 47.66 | 30.94 | 16.28 | 34.26 | 28.85 | 59.62 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 64.1% | 64.1% | 61.9% | 61.1% | 63.8% | 63.9% | 64.1% | 63.8% | 64.5% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 42.8% | 42.8% | 42.0% | 38.5% | 34.9% | 31.4% | 30.2% | 33.4% | 12.7% | 28.6% | 21.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 39.0% | 39.0% | 40.7% | 35.6% | 30.9% | 28.5% | 27.4% | 35.7% | 15.3% | 25.7% | 16.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 31.4% | 31.4% | 33.1% | 34.5% | 30.5% | 23.0% | 20.4% | 34.1% | 17.2% | 30.6% | 19.4% |
| ROA | 21.0% | 21.0% | 23.8% | 24.9% | 21.6% | 16.1% | 14.2% | 23.7% | 11.8% | 20.2% | 12.8% |
| ROIC | 32.8% | 32.8% | 35.3% | 35.5% | 29.9% | 23.5% | 24.0% | 35.6% | 17.3% | 49.7% | 50.5% |
| ROCE | 30.4% | 30.4% | 30.4% | 33.4% | 30.2% | 21.5% | 18.5% | 26.6% | 12.4% | 29.4% | 22.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.15 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.16 | -0.28 | -0.27 | -0.13 | -0.14 | -0.25 | -0.36 | -0.29 | -0.49 | -0.48 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.50 | -0.50 | -0.92 | -0.83 | -0.39 | -0.58 | -1.12 | -1.23 | -2.04 | -1.67 | -2.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.46 | -0.75 | -0.97 | -1.40 | -0.59 | -1.14 | -1.09 | -1.28 | -1.33 | -4.80 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 107.92 | 171.78 | 78.24 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.0B) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.05 | 3.05 | 4.36 | 4.38 | 4.29 | 4.34 | 4.99 | 5.81 | 4.48 | 4.28 | 3.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.63 | 2.63 | 3.69 | 3.36 | 3.29 | 3.75 | 4.37 | 5.41 | 4.04 | 3.70 | 2.81 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.04 | 2.61 | 2.34 | 3.07 | 3.74 | 4.56 | 3.23 | 2.90 | 1.89 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.37 | 1.15 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 1.74 | 3.55 | 2.94 | 1.91 | 1.72 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.48 | 59.44 | 64.43 | 76.90 | 63.95 | 61.35 | 59.35 | 56.29 | 54.84 | 81.82 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.2% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.8% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 2.8% | 5.2% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| FCF Yield | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 5.8% | 2.8% | 3.3% | 1.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.2B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ANET stock.
Arista Networks, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 45.9x. The historical average is 41.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Arista Networks, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 40.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 33.9x.
Arista Networks, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 31.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 37.2%.
Based on historical data, Arista Networks, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 45.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Arista Networks, Inc. has 64.1% gross margin and 42.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Hyperscaler customer concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Sustained Hypergrowth
Based on reported figures, ANET trades at 57.9x trailing earnings and 22.3x sales, with forward P/E compressing to 38.7x, suggesting the market is capitalizing an expected earnings ramp rather than current run-rate profitability.
The gap between trailing P/E of 57.9x and forward P/E of 38.7x implies consensus expects earnings to rise sharply over the next year, a compression that depends on the revenue re-acceleration visible in recent quarters. A PEG of 1.42 suggests the multiple is not extreme relative to the growth embedded in estimates, though that conclusion is only as reliable as the growth forecasts behind it. Investors should monitor whether hyperscaler capex sustains the top-line trajectory, since a digestion pause would leave the premium multiple exposed.
Margin Stability Amid Rapid Revenue Scaling
As reported in financial statements, ANET's gross margin held between 61.9% and 65.2% across ten quarters while operating margin reached 44.9% in Q3 2026, indicating that pricing power on software-led systems has not eroded as volume grew.
Operating margin expanding from 41.4% to 44.9% while revenue nearly doubled suggests operating leverage is working, with opex growing slower than gross profit. The 42.7% net margin sits close to operating margin, implying a light tax and interest burden and little dilution from non-operating items. The structural question is whether the mix shift toward large cloud titan orders, which may carry lower pricing, will pull gross margin down over time.
Zero Debt Eliminates Leverage Risk Entirely
Based on ANET's reported figures, total debt remained at zero across all ten quarters, so debt-to-equity, debt-to-EBITDA, and interest coverage are not meaningful metrics, leaving refinancing and covenant exposure effectively absent.
Because the company carries no funded debt, the standard leverage ratios return no information, and the analytical focus shifts from debt service to the adequacy of cash versus operating obligations. Total liabilities of $8.8B in Q3 2026 appear to be predominantly operational, such as payables and accrued items, which may warrant monitoring given the DPO trend. Investors should treat the absence of leverage as a structural strength rather than a source of earnings quality insight.
Liquidity Cushion Narrowing but Ample
As reported in financial statements, ANET's current ratio compressed from 4.55 in Q2 2024 to 2.83 in Q1 2026 before recovering to 3.29, while quick ratio followed a similar path, suggesting liquidity remains comfortable though the cushion has thinned relative to liabilities.
A current ratio above 2.8 in every quarter, even at the low point, indicates the company can meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory liquidation, which matters given the inventory-heavy hardware model. The compression over 2024 and 2025 largely reflects liabilities growing faster than current assets during the scaling phase. Under severe stress, the quick ratio near 2.5 or higher would likely still cover current liabilities, though a sustained decline in cash build would warrant closer scrutiny.
Working Capital Timing Drives Cash Conversion Swings
Based on reported quarterly figures, ANET's cash conversion cycle ranged between 209 and 320 days over ten quarters, with DIO near 200 days dominating the cycle, suggesting working capital intensity remains a primary driver of quarterly cash flow variability.
The DIO figure of roughly 198 to 298 days is high and is largely offset by DPO in the 40 to 58 day range, meaning the company is financing a substantial inventory build through its own cash rather than supplier credit. The CCC contraction from 320 days to about 209 days suggests improving inventory and payable management, though the inventory level remains elevated. Asset turnover of 0.13 to 0.15 is typical of an asset-heavy hardware model, and investors should monitor whether inventory build is tied to confirmed customer orders.
Returns Strong but Diluted by Cash Accumulation
According to reported quarterly data, ANET's ROIC ranged between 7.8% and 9.8% while ROE stayed between 7.5% and 10.0%, suggesting returns on capital are moderate in absolute terms despite very high operating margins.
The gap between high operating margins above 40% and ROIC below 10% reflects the large cash balance and asset base that dilute capital efficiency, rather than weak operations. ROE and ROIC moving together suggests the return profile is driven more by margin and turnover than by financial leverage, which is absent. Investors should consider whether the cash pile is being deployed productively, as sustained low-single-digit excess returns on that capital would weigh on long-term compounding.
Misapplied P/E Obscures Cash Timing Effects
Based on reported quarterly figures, trailing P/E of 57.9x is commonly applied to ANET as a hardware multiple, yet working capital swings and a 209-day cash conversion cycle may cause reported earnings to diverge materially from cash-based earning power.
Earnings-based multiples treat a hardware vendor with lumpy customer orders as if net income translated smoothly into cash, which the operating cash flow to net income ratio swinging between 0.77 and 1.66 contradicts. Free cash flow yield or EV to free cash flow, adjusted for stock-based compensation, is a more faithful lens for a business whose receivables and inventory timing dominate quarterly results. Investors should treat the P/E as a sentiment indicator rather than a precise measure of normalized earning power.