Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.3x · EV/EBITDA 13.1x · ROE 9.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.3B | $5.8B | $6.1B | $7.0B | $6.8B | $9.9B | $7.7B | $7.1B | $6.1B | $7.2B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.1B | $8.5B | $9.3B | $10.6B | $10.4B | $12.3B | $9.5B | $9.8B | $9.1B | $9.8B | $8.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.30 | 10.08 | 15.52 | 7.72 | 4.80 | 8.89 | 13.10 | — | 8.51 | 17.95 | 12.55 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.74 | 0.86 | 1.04 | 1.19 | 1.22 | 1.84 | 1.49 | 1.46 | 1.13 | 1.44 | 1.47 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 5.86 | 11.21 | — | 29.33 | 6.19 | 10.01 | 51.96 | — | 33.66 |
| P/OCF | 177.10 | 89.89 | 5.38 | 9.88 | — | 23.52 | 5.63 | 8.25 | 22.36 | 57.95 | 18.24 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.12 | 7.93 | 9.97 | 6.39 | 4.63 | 7.00 | 8.80 | 32.78 | 6.80 | 9.04 | 8.66 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.05 | 9.15 | 9.72 | 7.07 | 5.04 | 7.82 | 10.64 | 106.11 | 8.07 | 10.98 | 10.17 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 8.95 | 16.98 | — | 36.49 | 7.72 | 13.79 | 77.32 | — | 45.22 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 11.8% | 12.5% | 13.0% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 13.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 5.6% | 4.5% | 3.1% | 0.4% | 3.9% | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 3.2% | 2.0% | -0.7% | 2.4% | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.1% | 9.1% | 6.7% | 15.7% | 26.1% | 21.1% | 11.7% | -4.0% | 13.8% | 8.5% | 12.1% |
| ROA | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 4.2% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 3.5% | -1.2% | 4.2% | 2.6% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 7.6% | 7.6% | 6.2% | 11.8% | 18.3% | 15.8% | 9.2% | 1.0% | 10.8% | 9.8% | 9.9% |
| ROCE | 9.7% | 9.7% | 8.7% | 16.4% | 23.5% | 19.3% | 11.1% | 1.3% | 13.1% | 11.6% | 11.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.62 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.87 | 2.87 | 3.64 | 2.30 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 2.08 | 9.99 | 2.61 | 3.04 | 2.74 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.58 | 2.58 | 3.44 | 2.17 | 1.59 | 1.37 | 1.74 | 8.98 | 2.23 | 2.37 | 2.22 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 3.09 | 5.77 | — | 7.16 | 1.52 | 3.78 | 25.36 | — | 11.57 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.34 | 4.34 | 3.54 | 4.54 | 11.15 | 11.90 | 6.53 | 0.35 | 5.23 | 5.67 | 5.75 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.46 | 1.39 | 1.48 | 1.40 | 1.44 | 1.52 | 1.55 | 1.56 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.08 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.15 | 1.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.06 | 1.28 | 1.52 | 1.71 | 1.76 | 1.68 | 1.76 | 1.67 | 1.63 | 1.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.39 | 5.39 | 5.23 | 5.58 | 6.07 | 7.20 | 7.75 | 7.37 | 6.70 | 7.10 | 7.24 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 233.51 | 170.33 | 134.92 | 121.15 | 117.77 | 117.18 | 107.07 | 110.02 | 111.23 | 103.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.9% | 9.9% | 6.4% | 13.0% | 20.8% | 11.2% | 7.6% | — | 11.7% | 5.6% | 8.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 17.1% | 8.9% | — | 3.4% | 16.1% | 10.0% | 1.9% | — | 3.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.4% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 11.0% | 15.3% | 9.3% | 6.3% | 5.7% | 4.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 11.0% | 15.3% | 9.3% | 6.3% | 5.7% | 4.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $52M | $54M | $57M | $65M | $73M | $79M | $84M | $88M | $90M | $92M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ARW stock.
Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 20.3x. The historical average is 15.5x. This places it at the 89th percentile of its historical range.
Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.3x.
Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.1%. The historical average is 9.5%.
Based on historical data, Arrow Electronics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 20.3x. This is at the 89th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Arrow Electronics, Inc. has 11.2% gross margin and 3.0% operating margin.
Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical demand and margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cyclical Recovery Masks Valuation Appeal
ARW's forward P/E of 9.91 and forward EV/EBITDA of 7.03 appear cheap, but trailing P/E of 18.53 and PEG of 2.31 suggest the market is pricing in a cyclical peak, not a sustainable trend.
The steep discount between trailing and forward multiples (P/E from 18.53 to 9.91) reflects the market's expectation of a sharp earnings rebound, consistent with the 31.8% revenue surge in 2026Q2. However, the PEG of 2.31 implies that the current growth rate is not sufficient to justify the valuation on a long-term basis, suggesting investors are skeptical about the durability of the recovery. Compared to peers like AVT (P/E 24.29) and SNX (P/E 25.50), ARW's forward multiples are lower, but this may be a value trap if the cyclical upswing reverses.
Margin Recovery Still Below Historical Peaks
Gross margin stabilized near 11.3% in 2026Q2, but operating margin of 3.8% remains below the 12.3% gross margin seen in 2024Q2, indicating that the recovery is not yet complete.
The 98% year-over-year growth in operating income in 2026Q2 demonstrates significant operating leverage, as SG&A grew only 14.5% against a 31.8% revenue increase. However, the gross margin has not recovered to the 12.3% level of 2024Q2, suggesting that pricing power remains constrained in a competitive distribution environment. Net margin of 2.7% is still thin, and the low effective tax rate that boosted net income may not be sustainable, warranting caution on earnings quality.
ROIC Recovery Lags Revenue Momentum
ROIC improved to 3.1% in 2026Q2 from 1.5% a year earlier, but remains well below the cost of capital, indicating that the company is not yet generating sufficient returns on its expanded asset base.
The 89% surge in total assets to $38.4B, driven by working capital, has diluted ROIC despite the earnings recovery. ROE of 3.9% and ROA of 0.7% are also low, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of distribution and the thin margins inherent in the model. The improvement from the 2025Q3 trough (ROIC 1.5%) is encouraging, but the absolute level suggests that the company is still in the early stages of a cyclical recovery, and returns may not reach historical norms if the cycle peaks soon.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on Growth
CCC improved to 40 days in 2026Q2 from 84 days in 2024Q1, but DSO jumped to 246 days, indicating that receivables are growing faster than sales, which may strain liquidity.
The dramatic improvement in CCC is driven by a sharp increase in DPO to 266 days, which suggests ARW is stretching supplier payments to fund its working capital needs. However, DSO of 246 days is unusually high and may reflect extended payment terms granted to customers to drive sales, a common practice in distribution but one that increases credit risk. The asset turnover of 0.27 is low, consistent with the balance sheet expansion, and the efficiency gains may reverse if the cycle turns.
Leverage Declines but Payables Mask True Debt
D/E fell to 0.31 in 2026Q2 from 0.62 in 2024Q1, but D/EBITDA of 4.83 remains elevated, and the $31.3B in payables suggests the company is heavily reliant on trade credit.
The reduction in debt is positive, but the low D/E understates leverage because payables and other current liabilities have ballooned, as noted in the balance sheet analysis. Interest coverage improved to 5.34 in 2026Q1 from 0.84 in 2025Q1, indicating that debt service is becoming more comfortable, but the cyclicality of earnings could quickly erode this coverage if demand softens. The reliance on supplier financing is a structural feature of the distribution model, but it exposes ARW to liquidity risk if suppliers tighten terms.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Despite Cash Flow Surge
Current ratio fell to 1.22 in 2026Q2 from 1.49 in 2024Q1, and cash dropped to $244.6M, indicating a thinner liquidity cushion even as operating cash flow surged to $1.0B.
The improvement in cash flow is encouraging, but the declining current ratio and low cash balance suggest that ARW is deploying its cash into working capital to support growth. The quick ratio of 1.01 indicates that inventory is a significant component of current assets, and in a downturn, inventory may be hard to liquidate quickly. The company's ability to withstand a severe demand shock is questionable, given the thin liquidity buffer and the cyclicality of its cash flows.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The most commonly misapplied ratio for ARW is the P/E, which is distorted by cyclical earnings swings; a normalized earnings power or EV/EBITDA over a full cycle is more appropriate.
ARW's earnings are highly cyclical, as evidenced by the swing from a 1.2% net margin in 2025Q1 to 2.7% in 2026Q2. Using a trailing P/E of 18.53 or a forward P/E of 9.91 can mislead investors, as these multiples are based on trough or peak earnings that may not be sustainable. Instead, investors should use a mid-cycle earnings estimate or EV/EBITDA, which is less sensitive to depreciation and amortization differences, to better assess the company's valuation. The current forward EV/EBITDA of 7.03 may appear cheap, but it assumes the recovery persists, which is not guaranteed.