Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -43.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -22.3%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.5B | $18.6B | $3.3B | $493M | $262M | $411M | $703M | $284M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $17.4B | $18.5B | $2.9B | $481M | $37M | $102M | $667M | $259M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -43.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 246.22 | 262.16 | 737.88 | — | 18.98 | 33.11 | 117.73 | 200.68 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.25 | 7.77 | 4.87 | 2.31 | 0.73 | 1.17 | 8.78 | 9.54 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 260.79 | 649.16 | — | 2.64 | 8.23 | 111.74 | 183.18 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | 53.4% | 100.0% | — | 51.4% | 39.0% | 49.3% | 32.5% | 54.2% |
| Operating Margin | -405.7% | -405.7% | -5494.8% | — | -1054.4% | -675.8% | -393.3% | -770.0% | -1286.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -482.2% | -482.2% | -6792.3% | — | -228.9% | -246.3% | -403.2% | -769.8% | -1246.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -22.3% | -22.3% | -68.0% | -30.5% | -8.9% | -14.1% | -43.9% | -52.1% | -36.8% |
| ROA | -11.5% | -11.5% | -45.6% | -21.9% | -7.2% | -11.2% | -35.5% | -44.3% | -33.6% |
| ROIC | -16.8% | -16.8% | -76.2% | -99.6% | -123.3% | -143.6% | -71.5% | -164.3% | -69.6% |
| ROCE | -10.0% | -10.0% | -40.7% | -61.3% | -35.0% | -32.9% | -40.4% | -52.1% | -38.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.06 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.04 | -0.59 | -0.06 | -0.63 | -0.88 | -0.45 | -0.83 | -0.59 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -11.67 | -11.67 | -27.10 | -47.99 | -473.52 | — | -2435.70 | -22.85 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($2.3B) exceeds total debt ($2.2B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 16.35 | 16.35 | 7.90 | 2.31 | 9.65 | 15.71 | 3.88 | 4.47 | 7.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 16.27 | 16.27 | 7.90 | 2.31 | 9.65 | 15.64 | 3.69 | 4.45 | 7.04 |
| Cash Ratio | 15.54 | 15.54 | 7.44 | 1.85 | 8.58 | 15.05 | 3.26 | 4.27 | 6.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | 0.00 | — | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.75 | 2.75 | — | — | — | 5.36 | 1.17 | 5.24 | 5.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 194.17 | — | — | 44.17 | 63.94 | 127.29 | 84.67 | 462.40 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.1% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.1% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $256M | $155M | $82M | $54M | $52M | $52M | $29M | $25.9B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ASTS stock.
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -43.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -22.3%. The historical average is -34.6%.
Based on historical data, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -43.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. has 53.4% gross margin and -405.7% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Dilution and timeline slippage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Priced for Constellation Success
ASTS trades at 289.7x trailing sales and 7.4x book, implying the market capitalizes a future recurring revenue model, per recent filings. This valuation appears to embed substantial execution success.
The P/S multiple of 289.66 is extreme even for a pre-revenue space venture, suggesting investors are underwriting a successful transition to a utility-like revenue stream. With a negative P/E of -51.31, traditional earnings multiples are meaningless, and the market is valuing the option on future cash flows. Compared to peers like IRDM at 46.5x earnings, ASTS's valuation implies a growth trajectory far beyond current fundamentals, warranting scrutiny of technical milestones.
Margins Distorted by Pre-Scale Costs
Gross margin swung from 100% to -68.1% in 2025Q4, while operating margin improved to -9.4% in 2026Q2, per financial statements. These swings reflect milestone-based revenue and heavy fixed costs, not steady-state economics.
The extreme volatility in gross margin—from 100% in early quarters to -68.1% in 2025Q4—indicates that revenue recognition is tied to specific contracts and that launch costs are expensed unevenly. The improvement in operating margin from -133.1% to -9.4% is encouraging but still reflects a pre-commercial cost structure. Investors should focus on the trajectory of cash burn and the scalability of the ASIC-based satellites, as current margins are not indicative of long-term earning power.
Negative Returns Reflect Heavy Investment
ROIC has been consistently negative, ranging from -3.2% to -26.5% over the past ten quarters, as reported in financial statements. This indicates the company is in a heavy investment phase with no current return on capital.
The negative ROIC, which improved to -13.7% in 2026Q2 from -26.5% in 2024Q3, suggests that the massive capital expenditures in satellite manufacturing are not yet generating returns. The improvement is partly due to a larger capital base from equity raises, but the absolute level remains deeply negative. The key driver will be whether the deployed satellites can generate sufficient revenue to eventually cover the cost of capital, a transition that is far from assured.
Working Capital Swings Signal Milestone Dependence
DSO spiked to 939 days in 2026Q2, while CCC swung from -359 to 784 days, per recent filings. This volatility suggests revenue recognition is tied to milestone payments rather than recurring service.
The extreme DSO of 939 days in 2026Q2 indicates that a significant portion of revenue is from long-term contracts with deferred payments, typical of NRE agreements. The negative CCC in 2025Q3 (-359 days) reflects large deferred revenue and payables, but the swing to 784 days in 2026Q2 shows the lumpy nature of cash collections. This pattern underscores the lack of a stable recurring revenue base, and investors should monitor the conversion of MoUs into definitive agreements to smooth out these metrics.
Debt Converted, But Dilution Looms
Debt-to-equity fell from 1.12 in 2026Q1 to 0.01 in 2026Q2 after a $3.0B debt-to-equity conversion, per balance sheet data. This reduces leverage but signals potential shareholder dilution.
The dramatic reduction in D/E from 1.12 to 0.01 in a single quarter reflects a strategic conversion of debt into equity, which strengthens the balance sheet but dilutes existing shareholders. While interest coverage remains negative due to operating losses, the company has a large cash buffer of $2.3B. However, the ongoing cash burn of ~$97M per quarter suggests that further capital raises may be necessary, and the risk of dilution remains a key overhang.
Ample Runway Despite Cash Burn
Current ratio stands at 13.05 with $2.3B in cash, providing roughly 24 quarters of runway against quarterly operating burn, as reported in financial statements. This liquidity buffer appears robust.
The current ratio of 13.05 in 2026Q2 is exceptionally high, indicating that the company has more than sufficient short-term assets to cover liabilities. With cash of $2.3B and quarterly operating cash outflow of ~$97M, the company has a multi-year runway before needing additional funding. However, this liquidity is partly a result of recent equity raises, and the rapid growth in PPE suggests that capital expenditures will continue to consume cash. The liquidity position appears strong, but it is contingent on the company executing its deployment plan without major cost overruns.
Misapplied P/S Multiple
The P/S ratio of 289.66 is commonly used to value ASTS, but it is misleading given the current revenue is from non-recurring engineering contracts, not scalable service revenue, per recent filings.
Applying a P/S multiple to ASTS's current revenue is inappropriate because the revenue base is tiny and derived from milestone-based contracts, not recurring subscriptions. A more meaningful metric would be EV/invested capital or EV/forward capacity, which better reflects the value of the deployed satellite constellation. Investors should adjust for the one-time nature of NRE revenue and focus on the potential recurring revenue from MNO partnerships, which is not yet reflected in the financials.