Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -10.4x · EV/EBITDA 4601.5x · ROE -630.7%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.5B | $3.2B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $973M | $371M | $81M | $35M | $28M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.0B | $3.6B | $1.8B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $909M | $380M | $55M | $54M | $11M |
| P/E Ratio → | -10.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.02 | 4.13 | 2.15 | 3.80 | 3.64 | 4.60 | 6.72 | 3.27 | 0.88 | 0.35 | 0.23 |
| P/B Ratio | 41.78 | 87.63 | 139.10 | 18.01 | — | 14.07 | 6.18 | 5.13 | 4.60 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 555.66 | 1137.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 34.10 | 69.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.73 | 2.92 | 4.46 | 4.53 | 5.29 | 6.27 | 3.35 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4601.48 | 8313.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.74 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 1302.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 69.6% | 69.6% | 69.4% | 64.3% | 66.4% | 64.9% | 70.8% | 68.4% | 69.0% | 61.3% | 63.3% |
| Operating Margin | -10.7% | -10.7% | -22.3% | -36.0% | -41.9% | -52.7% | -40.6% | -41.7% | -24.5% | -8.8% | -12.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -18.8% | -18.8% | -26.5% | -38.7% | -43.1% | -58.8% | -54.5% | -50.3% | -31.6% | -2.3% | -25.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -630.7% | -630.7% | -291.7% | -556.7% | -676.1% | -120.8% | -68.8% | -126.9% | -164.9% | — | — |
| ROA | -18.3% | -18.3% | -20.5% | -28.1% | -27.7% | -34.2% | -35.9% | -37.4% | -27.1% | -2.6% | -25.2% |
| ROIC | -12.6% | -12.6% | -22.6% | -37.2% | -42.1% | -56.4% | -50.7% | -97.0% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -13.7% | -13.7% | -21.4% | -33.7% | -34.5% | -37.8% | -34.1% | -39.8% | -29.2% | -16.6% | -41.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 17.21 | 17.21 | 64.65 | 5.33 | — | 4.48 | 0.27 | 0.78 | 0.19 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1425.17 | 1425.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 12.74 | 49.94 | 3.15 | — | 2.12 | -0.41 | 0.13 | -1.47 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1055.50 | 1055.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 165.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -5.78 | -5.78 | -5.51 | -10.23 | -26.61 | -19.28 | -5.37 | — | -3.23 | 0.40 | -4.77 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.06 | 2.06 | 2.73 | 2.86 | 1.84 | 3.28 | 3.16 | 2.98 | 2.47 | 2.24 | 1.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.58 | 1.99 | 1.11 | 2.37 | 2.37 | 2.02 | 1.53 | 1.32 | 1.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 1.40 | 0.61 | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.29 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.48 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 1.20 | 1.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.07 | 1.26 | 1.16 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.44 | 1.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.48 | 49.53 | 54.96 | 62.48 | 62.87 | 61.99 | 51.97 | 61.48 | 53.18 | 56.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.2% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $150M | $143M | $121M | $103M | $96M | $67M | $52M | $35M | $13M | $9M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ATEC stock.
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -10.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4601.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.2x.
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -630.7%. The historical average is -81.0%.
Based on historical data, Alphatec Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -10.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Alphatec Holdings, Inc. has 69.6% gross margin and -10.7% operating margin.
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1425.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Negative equity and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Inflection Points to Leverage
Operating margin improved from -26.2% in 2025Q1 to -0.9% in 2026Q2, per reported financials, while gross margin swung 1,110 bps, suggesting early operating leverage but persistent net losses.
The sharp improvement in operating margin, from -26.2% to -0.9% over five quarters, indicates that SG&A growth is finally lagging revenue expansion, a sign that the aggressive sales force investment is beginning to pay off. However, net margin remains deeply negative at -12.1% in 2026Q2, reflecting continued interest expense and other non-operating costs. The 1,110 basis point swing in gross margin between 2026Q1 and 2026Q2 warrants scrutiny; it may reflect product mix shifts or one-time items, but if unsustainable, it could undermine the apparent profitability inflection.
Return on Capital Remains Deeply Negative
ROIC improved from -7.9% in 2025Q1 to -0.3% in 2026Q2, per reported data, but remains negative, indicating the company is still destroying value on invested capital, though at a decelerating pace.
Despite the improvement, ROIC of -0.3% in 2026Q2 means ATEC is still not generating returns above its cost of capital, which is typical for a growth-stage company prioritizing market share. The trend suggests that the heavy investments in sales force and instrument sets are starting to yield incremental returns, but the absolute level remains far from acceptable. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can turn positive as revenue scales; if not, the business model may require a fundamental shift in capital allocation.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 256 days in 2026Q2 from 253 days in 2024Q1, per reported figures, driven by DIO of 292 days, indicating significant inventory buildup that may signal slowing demand or deliberate stocking.
The cash conversion cycle remains elevated at 256 days, with days inventory outstanding at 292 days, far exceeding the peer norm. This suggests that ATEC is carrying substantial inventory, possibly to support rapid surgeon adoption or as a result of slowing case volume growth. The slight improvement in DPO to 83 days from 121 days in 2024Q1 indicates the company is paying suppliers faster, which could strain liquidity if not offset by improved collections. The efficiency of working capital management appears to be deteriorating, which may pressure cash flow if growth decelerates further.
Leverage Spikes as Equity Turns Negative
Debt-to-equity became undefined in 2026Q2 as equity fell to -$12.1M, per SEC filings, while total debt remained at $604M, indicating extreme leverage and heightened refinancing risk.
With negative equity, the debt-to-equity ratio is no longer meaningful, but the absolute debt load of $604M against a market cap of roughly $1.5B suggests significant financial risk. Interest coverage remains negative at -1.34 in 2026Q2, meaning operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, forcing reliance on cash reserves and external financing. The company's ability to service debt hinges on continued revenue growth and margin expansion; any slowdown could trigger covenant breaches or force dilutive equity raises.
Liquidity Buffer Thins but Remains Adequate
Current ratio declined to 1.89 in 2026Q2 from 2.06 in 2025Q4, per reported data, with quick ratio at 1.07, indicating a shrinking but still positive liquidity cushion against near-term obligations.
The current ratio of 1.89 suggests ATEC can cover short-term liabilities, but the quick ratio of 1.07 reveals that inventory constitutes a significant portion of current assets, which may be less liquid in a downturn. Cash stood at $118.7M, providing a modest buffer, but with negative equity and persistent losses, the company remains dependent on external financing. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a drop in elective procedures, the liquidity position could deteriorate quickly, especially if inventory becomes difficult to convert to cash.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA of 4368x is meaningless given negative EBITDA, per reported data; investors should instead focus on EV/Sales and forward EV/EBITDA, which better capture ATEC's growth-stage economics.
The trailing EV/EBITDA multiple is distorted by near-zero EBITDA, making it an unreliable valuation metric for ATEC. The forward EV/EBITDA of 7.31x appears more reasonable, but it assumes significant margin expansion that is not yet proven. A more appropriate approach is to use EV/Sales (1.89x) and compare it to high-growth medtech peers, while also monitoring the path to positive EBITDA. Investors should adjust for stock-based compensation and instrument depreciation to assess true cash earnings power, as these non-cash charges significantly depress reported profitability.