Operating cash flow of $111.9M in 2026Q2 was only 51% of net income, suggesting earnings quality concerns, while free cash flow turned positive at $27.6M, but dividends of $65.4M exceeded FCF, indicating reliance on other funding sources.
Aura Minerals (AUGO) cash flow statement — 6-year operating, investing & financing cash flows
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 |
|---|
| Cash from Operations | 379.87M | 257.93M | 222.24M | 124.95M | 96.36M | 131.19M | 87.18M |
| Operating CF Margin % | - | 27.98% | 37.4% | 29.97% | 24.54% | 30.94% | 29.07% |
| Operating CF Growth % | 312.15% | 16.06% | 77.87% | 29.66% | -26.55% | 50.48% | - |
| Net Income | 298.61M | -79.34M | -30.27M | 31.88M | 66.5M | 43.5M | 68.48M |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 106.29M | 75.81M | 28.43M | 23.63M | 19.82M | 37.8M | 24.18M |
| Stock-Based Compensation | 544K | 0 | 186K | 287K | 471K | 660K | 0 |
| Deferred Taxes | 1.86M | 0 | 82.69M | 6.43M | 25.74M | 57.26M | 8.95M |
| Other Non-Cash Items | 39.63M | 292.7M | 175.11M | 59.88M | -16.89M | 26.11M | -7.29M |
| Working Capital Changes | -67.07M | -31.24M | -33.91M | 2.84M | 725K | -34.15M | -7.13M |
| Change in Receivables | -22.98M | 0 | -7.25M | -9.19M | -13.01M | -14.74M | -10.12M |
| Change in Inventory | -7.06M | 0 | -12.08M | -12.71M | 13.48M | -8.95M | -10.24M |
| Change in Payables | 22.57K | 0 | 6.99M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.29M |
| Cash from Investing | -258.1M | -253.98M | -176.4M | -93.93M | -157.5M | -78.16M | -51.06M |
| Capital Expenditures | -204.31M | -179.43M | -180.58M | -96.09M | -103.36M | -79.47M | -51.97M |
| CapEx % of Revenue | 15.86% | 19.47% | 30.39% | 23.05% | 26.32% | 18.74% | 17.33% |
| Acquisitions | 2M | 0 | -1.24M | 1.56M | -54.35M | 1.3M | 912K |
| Investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Investing | -140K | 0 | 0 | 600K | 221K | 0 | 0 |
| Cash from Financing | -41.46M | 10.47M | 5.2M | 79.43M | 21.88M | -8.63M | 44.48M |
| Debt Issued (Net) | -25.98M | -62.83M | 116.67M | 99.88M | 64.82M | 79.65M | -730K |
| Equity Issued (Net) | 195.29M | 199.96M | -13.17M | 0 | -9.34M | 1.57M | 52.09M |
| Dividends Paid | -187.53M | -115.81M | -42.69M | -28.16M | -20.25M | -85.63M | -3.04M |
| Share Repurchases | -6.08M | -351K | -13.36M | 0 | -9.34M | 0 | -107K |
| Other Financing | -23.23M | -10.85M | -55.62M | 7.71M | -13.36M | -4.21M | -3.84M |
| Net Change in Cash | 208.58M | 223M | 32.89M | 109.39M | -33.59M | 43.71M | 79.02M |
| Free Cash Flow | 175.56M | 78.5M | 41.66M | 28.85M | -7M | 51.72M | 35.21M |
| FCF Margin % | 13.63% | 8.52% | 7.01% | 6.92% | -1.78% | 12.2% | 11.74% |
| FCF Growth % | 1070.99% | 88.42% | 44.39% | 512.05% | -113.54% | 46.9% | - |
| FCF per Share | 2.07 | 0.95 | 0.58 | 0.40 | -0.10 | 0.71 | 0.51 |
| FCF Conversion (FCF/Net Income) | 0.59x | -3.25x | -7.34x | 3.92x | 1.45x | 3.02x | 1.27x |
| Interest Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taxes Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AUGO stock.
Aura Minerals (AUGO) generated $257.9M in net cash from operating activities in 2025. This reflects the cash generated directly from core business operations.
Aura Minerals (AUGO) generated $78.5M in free cash flow in 2025. Free cash flow is the cash left over after capital expenditures, which can be used to pay dividends, repurchase shares, or pay down debt.
Aura Minerals (AUGO) spent $179.4M on capital expenditures in 2025. CapEx represents the cash invested in physical assets like property, plant, and equipment to maintain or grow the business.
In 2025, Aura Minerals (AUGO) returned $115.8M to shareholders via cash dividends and spent $0.4M on share repurchases. This shows the company's commitment to returning capital to its equity investors.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent non-operating losses
Earnings Quality Masked by Non-Cash Charges
In 2026Q2, operating cash flow of $111.9M was only 51% of net income, per recent filings, suggesting that reported earnings include substantial non-cash gains that may not recur.
The OCF/NI ratio of 0.51 in 2026Q2, down from 1.17 in the prior quarter, indicates that net income is increasingly decoupled from cash generation. This divergence likely stems from non-cash items such as deferred tax benefits or mark-to-market gains, which inflate earnings without corresponding cash inflows. Investors should monitor whether this gap narrows as the Almas ramp-up matures, as sustained divergence would signal lower earnings quality.
FCF Inflection Points to Almas Ramp-Up
Free cash flow turned positive at $27.6M in 2026Q2, up from -$18.3M in 2025Q1, as reported in cash flow statements, reflecting the Almas mine's contribution to operating cash flow.
The FCF margin improved from -11.3% in 2025Q1 to 8.2% in 2026Q2, a swing of nearly 20 percentage points, indicating that the company is now generating cash after capital expenditures. However, the absolute FCF remains modest relative to revenue, and the trajectory is uneven, with 2025Q4 and 2024Q4 showing near-zero or negative FCF. This suggests that while the trend is positive, sustainability depends on maintaining production levels and controlling capex.
Capital Intensity Eases as Almas Matures
CapEx as a percentage of revenue declined from 39.0% in 2024Q4 to 25.1% in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, indicating that the heavy investment phase for Almas is tapering off.
The reduction in capital intensity, from peak levels above 38% in late 2024 to 25.1% in 2026Q2, suggests that the company is transitioning from growth capex to maintenance capex. This shift should free up cash flow for debt reduction or shareholder returns, but investors should note that Borborema development may require a new capex cycle. The absolute capex of $84.3M in 2026Q2 remains significant, and any cost overruns could pressure FCF.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Operational Scaling
Working capital changes were negative in four of the last five quarters, with a -$44.2M outflow in 2026Q1, as per cash flow data, indicating that rapid revenue growth is consuming cash.
The persistent negative working capital changes, particularly the -$44.2M in 2026Q1, suggest that Aura is building inventory and receivables to support its expanding production base. This is typical for a company in a growth phase, but it also means that operating cash flow is being partially absorbed by working capital needs. As growth normalizes, these outflows should reverse, providing a potential boost to cash flow.
Dividends Outpace FCF, Raising Sustainability Questions
Dividends paid of $65.4M in 2026Q2 exceeded free cash flow of $27.6M, as reported in cash flow statements, suggesting that the dividend is being funded by other sources.
The fact that dividends exceeded FCF in 2026Q2, and also in 2025Q4 and 2025Q2, indicates that the company is prioritizing shareholder returns even when cash generation is insufficient. This may be sustainable in the short term due to cash reserves or debt, but it raises concerns about the long-term viability of the dividend if FCF does not improve. Investors should monitor whether the payout ratio becomes more conservative as capex needs evolve.
Cumulative Earnings vs Cash: A Widening Gap
Over the last ten quarters, cumulative net income of $213.3M contrasts with cumulative operating cash flow of $690.0M, per reported data, indicating that cash generation has far exceeded accounting profits.
The cumulative gap of $476.7M between net income and operating cash flow suggests that Aura's earnings are heavily impacted by non-cash charges, likely impairments and deferred taxes, which depress reported profits but do not affect cash. This divergence is a positive signal for cash flow quality, as it implies that the company's cash-generating ability is stronger than net income suggests. However, it also means that the market's focus on net income may undervalue the company's true cash earnings power.
What the Cash Flow Statement Obscures
Despite strong operating cash flow, the cash flow statement may obscure the impact of capitalized development costs and non-cash impairments, as evidenced by the persistent gap between operating and net margins.
The cash flow statement shows robust operating cash flow, but the significant divergence between operating income and net income suggests that non-cash charges, such as impairments or deferred tax adjustments, are not fully transparent in the cash flow presentation. Additionally, the capitalization of development costs for projects like Borborema may understate current cash outflows, as these are classified as investing rather than operating activities. Investors should adjust for these items to assess the true cash-generating capacity of the company.