Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.1x · EV/EBITDA 12.7x · ROE 17.8%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.2B | $12.0B | $16.5B | $22.8B | $31.3B | $32.4B | $36.7B | $29.9B | $25.7B | $27.1B | $18.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.0B | $13.9B | $18.8B | $25.5B | $33.8B | $33.8B | $38.1B | $31.8B | $27.9B | $29.5B | $20.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.10 | 16.84 | 18.93 | 22.26 | 39.93 | 38.76 | 40.57 | 36.16 | 30.80 | 37.86 | 27.64 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.11 | 3.06 | 4.15 | 5.47 | 7.40 | 8.24 | 10.59 | 8.89 | 7.73 | 8.36 | 6.17 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.04 | 2.99 | 4.13 | 6.49 | 9.57 | 11.84 | 13.80 | 15.13 | 15.60 | 20.62 | 13.49 |
| P/FCF | 13.66 | 13.47 | 38.23 | 54.50 | 68.45 | 40.61 | 48.56 | 48.91 | 37.72 | 53.74 | 35.06 |
| P/OCF | 12.20 | 12.03 | 27.55 | 35.29 | 48.87 | 34.63 | 44.88 | 41.27 | 32.11 | 42.94 | 28.92 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.53 | 4.72 | 6.10 | 8.00 | 8.60 | 11.00 | 9.46 | 8.39 | 9.07 | 6.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.66 | 12.51 | 14.97 | 20.66 | 28.02 | 26.35 | 30.63 | 27.30 | 22.92 | 26.49 | 19.14 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.66 | 12.51 | 15.60 | 17.89 | 30.55 | 28.27 | 32.77 | 29.16 | 24.67 | 28.19 | 20.61 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.53 | 43.54 | 60.83 | 74.00 | 42.37 | 50.43 | 52.06 | 40.93 | 58.33 | 38.80 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 60.5% | 60.5% | 58.9% | 60.5% | 59.0% | 60.8% | 60.5% | 63.2% | 65.2% | 67.8% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | 28.2% | 29.4% | 27.5% | 26.7% | 30.6% | 33.7% | 32.4% | 34.4% | 32.3% | 33.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.2% | 18.2% | 21.9% | 24.5% | 18.5% | 21.3% | 26.1% | 24.6% | 25.1% | 22.1% | 22.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.8% | 17.8% | 23.1% | 30.2% | 26.1% | 31.1% | 39.0% | 45.7% | 56.4% | 53.4% | 45.6% |
| ROA | 8.9% | 8.9% | 10.7% | 12.8% | 11.1% | 13.0% | 14.7% | 15.2% | 16.5% | 14.9% | 15.2% |
| ROIC | 13.7% | 13.7% | 14.1% | 14.4% | 17.0% | 22.0% | 22.0% | 21.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | 24.7% |
| ROCE | 16.2% | 16.2% | 17.1% | 17.2% | 18.7% | 22.0% | 22.2% | 23.4% | 26.6% | 26.8% | 28.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 1.32 | 1.51 | 1.94 | 1.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.94 | 1.94 | 2.18 | 2.51 | 2.41 | 1.77 | 2.06 | 2.23 | 2.05 | 2.30 | 2.01 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.46 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.98 | 1.33 | 1.76 | 1.44 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.83 | 2.15 | 2.10 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.65 | 1.80 | 2.08 | 1.84 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.06 | 5.31 | 6.33 | 5.56 | 1.76 | 1.87 | 3.15 | 3.21 | 4.59 | 3.73 |
| Interest Coverage | 12.46 | 12.46 | 9.86 | 11.22 | 12.30 | 14.59 | 14.35 | 13.30 | 12.84 | 15.37 | 16.81 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.88 | 2.59 | 3.51 | 3.65 | 4.27 | 3.71 | 3.87 | 3.11 | 2.42 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.56 | 0.95 | 1.40 | 1.89 | 2.36 | 1.79 | 1.71 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.84 | 1.25 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 77.31 | 76.21 | 67.18 | 73.81 | 75.45 | 79.41 | 61.86 | 66.87 | 71.81 | 67.90 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.5% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 2.6% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 59.7% | 59.7% | 48.3% | 39.5% | 48.3% | 99.2% | 37.4% | 39.3% | 37.1% | 107.8% | 41.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | 5.9% | 5.3% | 4.5% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| FCF Yield | 7.3% | 7.4% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.3% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.8% | 6.9% | 2.5% | 3.5% | 1.2% | 2.6% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 2.9% | 4.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $467M | $473M | $477M | $481M | $481M | $481M | $480M | $482M | $484M | $488M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BF-B stock.
Brown-Forman Corporation's current P/E ratio is 17.1x. The historical average is 25.1x. This places it at the 7th percentile of its historical range.
Brown-Forman Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 12.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.7x.
Brown-Forman Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 17.8%. The historical average is 30.6%.
Based on historical data, Brown-Forman Corporation is trading at a P/E of 17.1x. This is at the 7th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Brown-Forman Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.50% with a payout ratio of 59.7%.
Brown-Forman Corporation has 60.5% gross margin and 28.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Brown-Forman Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Post-pandemic demand normalization
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation Faces Growth Headwinds
Brown-Forman trades at a forward P/E of 15.67 and EV/EBITDA of 11.54, a premium to Diageo's 11.86 EV/EBITDA, suggesting the market still prices in its brand strength despite recent revenue contraction.
The valuation premium over larger, more diversified peers like Diageo appears to be predicated on the singular strength of the Jack Daniel's franchise and the family-controlled governance model. However, with revenue growth stalling at -1.18% and operating margins compressing from 38.9% to 27.7% over the past year, the current multiples may not be sustainable if the company cannot re-accelerate top-line growth. The 3.4% dividend yield provides a floor, but the PEG ratio's unavailability underscores the challenge in modeling a clear growth trajectory.
Gross Margin Resilience Masks Operating Leverage Erosion
Gross margin has recovered to 60.3% in 2027Q1 from a low of 57.4% in 2025Q4, yet operating margin has compressed sharply to 27.7% from a peak of 38.9%, indicating fixed-cost pressures as volume stagnates.
The divergence between resilient gross margins and declining operating margins suggests that Brown-Forman's pricing power is intact, but its high fixed-cost base in distilling and aging is now acting as a drag on profitability as revenue growth decelerates. The net margin of 19.3% is healthy but volatile, as seen in the swing from 25.3% to 5.9% in consecutive quarters, which may indicate non-operational items are distorting the underlying earnings power. Investors should monitor whether the strategic shift toward lower-margin RTDs will permanently compress the consolidated margin profile.
Declining Returns Signal Capital Efficiency Challenge
ROIC has trended downward from 4.6% in 2024Q4 to 3.2% in 2027Q1, while ROE has fallen from 7.9% to 4.4%, suggesting the company's massive capital base is generating lower returns amid slowing growth.
The declining ROIC trend is particularly concerning given the capital-intensive nature of the whiskey aging process, which locks up capital for years. The current ROIC of 3.2% appears to be below the company's estimated cost of capital, implying value erosion rather than creation. This deterioration is driven by both margin compression and a slight decline in asset turnover from 0.13 to 0.12, indicating that the company's invested capital is becoming less efficient at generating sales. The trend warrants investigation into whether the recent brand divestitures are improving or further diluting capital efficiency.
Extended Cash Cycle Reflects Aging Inventory Lock-Up
The cash conversion cycle has expanded to 613 days in 2027Q1 from 541 days in 2024Q4, driven primarily by a Days Inventory Outstanding of 650 days, which is a structural feature of the whiskey maturation process.
The extremely long CCC is not a sign of operational inefficiency but rather a reflection of the multi-year aging required for premium whiskey, which represents a significant 'frozen' capital asset. The DSO of 84 days and DPO of 121 days are relatively stable, suggesting consistent terms with customers and suppliers. However, the expansion of the CCC over the past year, even as revenue growth stalls, may indicate that inventory is aging longer than planned or that demand is not clearing stock as quickly as anticipated, which could pressure future cash flows.
Conservative Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
Brown-Forman's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62 and interest coverage of 10.16x indicate a fortress-like balance sheet, providing significant flexibility to navigate the current demand slowdown and potential input cost volatility.
The company's conservative leverage is a key differentiator in the consumer staples sector, especially compared to more leveraged peers like Diageo (D/E of 1.85). This low leverage, combined with strong interest coverage, suggests minimal refinancing risk and the capacity to fund strategic investments or weather a prolonged downturn without financial distress. However, the low debt level also implies that management is not aggressively using leverage to enhance returns, which may be a missed opportunity if the cost of debt remains favorable relative to the company's return on invested capital.
The Misleading Signal of the Current Ratio
The current ratio of 3.26 appears exceptionally strong but is misleading because a significant portion of current assets is tied up in aging whiskey inventory that cannot be quickly monetized without compromising future premium pricing.
This ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric to Brown-Forman's business model because it treats all current assets as equally liquid. In reality, the 650 days of inventory represent a strategic asset, not a liquid one. A more appropriate metric for assessing true short-term liquidity would be the quick ratio, which at 1.14 provides a more conservative view by excluding inventory. Analysts should also consider the quality of the inventory; the value of aging whiskey appreciates over time, unlike typical consumer goods inventory, which complicates the standard interpretation of liquidity ratios for this specific business model.