Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -29.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -42.2%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.4B | $939M | $660M | $222M | $492M | $1.2B | $120M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.3B | $809M | $595M | $112M | $361M | $769M | $114M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -29.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 25.10 | 9.62 | 8.05 | 3.37 | 6.70 | 18.59 | 2.59 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.60 | 4.79 | 3.91 | 1.01 | 1.51 | 2.60 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.29 | 7.25 | 1.70 | 4.92 | 12.29 | 2.45 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.9% | 46.9% | 59.5% | 25.6% | 53.8% | 27.3% | -132.4% | -75.8% | -47.8% |
| Operating Margin | -88.5% | -88.5% | -90.7% | -221.0% | -263.0% | -308.0% | -349.4% | -370.9% | -3478.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -79.0% | -79.0% | -88.3% | -202.9% | -229.9% | -51.8% | -351.9% | -361.1% | -3326.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -42.2% | -42.2% | -37.3% | -49.0% | -43.7% | -14.5% | -220.4% | -51.0% | -21.0% |
| ROA | -27.9% | -27.9% | -25.9% | -37.0% | -34.1% | -9.0% | -104.2% | -48.2% | -20.5% |
| ROIC | -76.8% | -76.8% | -52.3% | -71.6% | -116.5% | -620.0% | -472.1% | -178.3% | — |
| ROCE | -39.3% | -39.3% | -31.8% | -46.5% | -43.5% | -64.3% | -142.2% | -52.2% | -21.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.06 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.66 | -0.39 | -0.50 | -0.40 | -0.88 | — | -0.61 | -0.89 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -50.65 | -50.65 | -56.51 | — | -84339.50 | -48.60 | -141.60 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($150M) exceeds total debt ($20M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.83 | 3.83 | 3.99 | 5.22 | 6.96 | 10.27 | 1.40 | 7.13 | 40.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.53 | 3.57 | 5.79 | 9.55 | 1.03 | 6.51 | 38.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.31 | 2.31 | 1.84 | 3.04 | 4.63 | 8.49 | 0.86 | 5.87 | 35.97 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 1.26 | 4.16 | 5.13 | 0.21 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 100.01 | 92.49 | 74.32 | 73.03 | 69.63 | 45.39 | 25.82 | 180.83 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $247M | $212M | $205M | $200M | $174M | $6M | $6M | $5M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BFLY stock.
Butterfly Network, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -29.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Butterfly Network, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -42.2%. The historical average is -59.9%.
Based on historical data, Butterfly Network, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -29.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Butterfly Network, Inc. has 46.9% gross margin and -88.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn and dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Inflection Points to Mix Shift
Gross margin expanded from 58.2% in 2024Q1 to 71.4% in 2026Q2, per reported financials, signaling a favorable mix shift toward software and the iQ3 launch, though operating margin remains deeply negative at -41.9%.
The 13.2 percentage point gross margin improvement over ten quarters suggests that the hardware/software mix is becoming more software-heavy, a structural shift that could support future profitability. However, operating margin, while improving from -128.1% to -41.9%, still reflects a high fixed-cost base, particularly in SG&A, which remains the largest cost line. The 2025Q3 gross margin anomaly of -17.5% highlights the volatility in this metric, likely due to inventory write-downs or one-time charges, and investors should monitor whether the 71.4% level is sustainable or a temporary peak.
ROIC Remains Deeply Negative but Improving
ROIC improved from -15.0% in 2024Q1 to -13.1% in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, but remains deeply negative, indicating the company is still destroying value on invested capital, though the pace of decay is slowing.
The improvement in ROIC is driven primarily by margin expansion rather than capital efficiency, as asset turnover remains low at 0.11. ROE and ROA have also improved modestly, but all remain negative, reflecting the company's pre-profit stage. The trend suggests that while the business is moving in the right direction, it has not yet reached the scale needed to generate positive returns on capital. Investors should watch for a sustained inflection in ROIC, which would require both margin expansion and revenue growth to outpace the fixed cost base.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency Metrics
Cash conversion cycle improved from 913 days in 2024Q1 to 628 days in 2026Q2, per financial statements, but remains extremely high due to inventory days of 575, indicating significant capital tied up in slow-moving inventory.
The CCC improvement is driven by a reduction in DIO from 909 to 575 days, but inventory levels remain elevated, likely reflecting the launch of the iQ3 and the need to hold multiple generations of probes. DSO has increased from 70 to 83 days, suggesting slower collections, while DPO has declined from 67 to 31 days, indicating less leverage over suppliers. These trends suggest that working capital management is not yet a source of cash, and the high inventory days may signal a risk of obsolescence as new models are introduced. The volatility in CCC, swinging from 332 to 913 days, underscores the difficulty in forecasting cash flows.
Low Debt Masks Refinancing Risk
Debt-to-equity remains low at 0.10, with total debt of $19.1M, but negative interest coverage of -44.78 in 2026Q2, as reported, indicates that operating losses far exceed interest expense, though the company has no near-term debt maturities.
The conservative leverage is a positive, but the negative interest coverage ratio is not a concern given the minimal debt load. However, the company's cash burn of approximately $16M per quarter suggests that it may need to raise capital in the future, which could be dilutive given the current market cap. The D/E ratio has remained stable, but the equity base is shrinking due to accumulated losses, which could increase leverage if debt is added. Investors should monitor the cash runway and any potential capital raises, as the low debt level provides some flexibility but does not eliminate the need for external funding.
Liquidity Buffer Shrinking Despite High Current Ratio
Current ratio stands at 4.06, but cash dropped from $155.2M to $124.7M over the last five quarters, per balance sheet data, indicating a shrinking liquidity buffer relative to the quarterly operating burn of ~$16M.
The high current ratio is misleading because it is inflated by inventory, which may not be easily convertible to cash. The quick ratio of 3.06 is more conservative but still appears healthy. However, the cash runway is limited; at the current burn rate, the company has roughly 7-8 quarters of cash, assuming no revenue growth. The 2025Q4 positive FCF of $7.9M was an anomaly, and 2026Q2 reverted to -$17.2M, highlighting the volatility in cash generation. Investors should stress-test the balance sheet under scenarios of slower revenue growth or increased working capital needs, as the current ratio may overstate the true liquidity position.
Misapplied P/S Multiple on Pre-Profit Model
The P/S ratio of 26.05 is often used to value BFLY, but this metric fails to account for the company's negative gross margins in some quarters and its heavy reliance on hardware sales, which carry lower margins than software.
For a hybrid hardware/software company like BFLY, the P/S multiple is misleading because it does not differentiate between high-margin software revenue and low-margin hardware sales. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Sales adjusted for the software mix, or a multiple on gross profit, which better reflects the underlying economics. Additionally, the company's negative operating margin means that P/S does not capture the cash burn required to generate revenue. Investors should consider a sum-of-the-parts valuation that assigns a higher multiple to the software subscription business and a lower multiple to hardware, or use EV/Revenue with a forward-looking margin assumption. The current P/S of 26.05 implies a significant growth premium that may not be justified given the company's cash flow realities.