Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -83.2%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $48M | $96M | $100M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $39M | $87M | $112M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.39 | 2.77 | 3.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.00 | 3.75 | 75.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.51 | 4.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.3% | 59.3% | 55.4% | 44.5% | 22.2% | 31.9% | 34.8% | 13.3% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -16.2% | -16.2% | -27.7% | -78.6% | -193.0% | -403.9% | -1557.1% | -1059.6% | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -32.3% | -32.3% | -51.3% | -99.1% | -204.4% | -467.5% | -1662.6% | -2435.8% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -83.2% | -83.2% | -970.9% | — | — | -3509.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -30.6% | -30.6% | -64.6% | -103.0% | -114.6% | -126.7% | -179.7% | -138.9% | — | — | — |
| ROIC | -28.6% | -28.6% | -70.4% | -297.5% | -371.0% | -37460.3% | — | -227.5% | -200.4% | — | -239.8% |
| ROCE | -22.0% | -22.0% | -65.1% | — | -411.4% | -158.8% | -180.8% | — | -146.4% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.55 | 0.55 | 10.39 | — | — | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.35 | 8.59 | — | — | -0.51 | — | — | -0.14 | -0.79 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.06 | -3.06 | -5.69 | -5.40 | -7.03 | -11.21 | -11.31 | -1.02 | -5.58 | -40.47 | -14.36 |
Net cash position: cash ($23M) exceeds total debt ($14M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.97 | 3.97 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 1.94 | 1.18 | 0.05 | 32.15 | 7.89 | 0.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.38 | 3.38 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 1.62 | 1.13 | 0.05 | 32.15 | 7.89 | 0.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.00 | 3.00 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 1.41 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 19.70 | 7.81 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.72 | 1.01 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.11 | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.08 | 3.08 | 3.08 | 2.85 | 3.11 | 1.54 | 2.58 | 3.71 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 23.72 | 19.45 | 27.88 | 47.93 | 107.66 | 326.29 | 470.48 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $16M | $14M | $13M | $12M | $10M | $3M | $2M | $578472 | $416055 |
Persistent Operating Cash Burn
Based on reported figures, BHST trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.39, which appears to reflect a speculative premium for its proprietary bioreactor technology rather than current earnings, as the company continues to report a negative TTM P/E ratio of -4.62 in recent financial disclosures.
The current valuation suggests that investors are pricing the company as a high-growth biotech platform rather than a traditional nutraceutical firm. However, the lack of positive EBITDA multiples makes it difficult to benchmark against established peers, implying that the market is heavily discounting future CDMO revenue potential over current DTC performance.
As reported in financial statements, BHST has struggled to generate positive returns, with ROIC remaining deeply negative at -7.5% in 2026Q1, indicating that the capital deployed into bioreactor infrastructure has yet to reach the critical mass required to overcome high initial operating and research expenditures.
The persistent negative ROIC trend over the last ten quarters highlights the difficulty of scaling a capital-intensive manufacturing process. Until the company can demonstrate a clear path to positive margins, the return on invested capital will likely remain a reflection of ongoing cash burn rather than operational compounding.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 83 days in 2026Q1, which suggests that inventory management and collection cycles remain sensitive to the company's rapid commercial scaling and the inherent complexities of managing live cell-based biomass production.
The high days-in-inventory, which peaked at 124 days in 2026Q1, indicates a potential mismatch between production capacity and consumer demand. Investors should monitor whether this reflects strategic stockpiling for future CDMO growth or an inability to efficiently move finished VINIA products through the direct-to-consumer channel.
Based on the latest quarterly data, BHST's current ratio improved to 2.96 in 2026Q1, yet this liquidity buffer appears highly dependent on external financing rather than internal cash generation, as the company continues to navigate a period of significant asset expansion and persistent operating losses.
While the current ratio suggests a temporary strengthening of short-term liquidity, the reliance on equity-based funding to maintain this position warrants caution. The company's ability to sustain operations under stress remains vulnerable to capital market conditions, given the lack of consistent positive free cash flow.
Investors frequently misapply top-line revenue growth as a proxy for business health, ignoring that BHST's 37% YoY growth is heavily influenced by aggressive marketing spend, which, as reported in financial filings, obscures the underlying profitability challenges inherent in the current direct-to-consumer business model.
Focusing solely on revenue growth ignores the high customer acquisition costs required to sustain the VINIA brand. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the ratio of lifetime value to customer acquisition cost, which would better reveal whether the company is truly building a sustainable, recurring revenue base.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BHST stock.
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. Common Stock's current P/E ratio is -4.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. Common Stock's return on equity (ROE) is -83.2%. The historical average is -83.2%.
Based on historical data, BioHarvest Sciences Inc. Common Stock is trading at a P/E of -4.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. Common Stock has 59.3% gross margin and -16.2% operating margin.