Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -27.1%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $201M | $475M | $208M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $18M | $292M | $-138073286 | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.27 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 23.38 | 52.85 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.71 | 1.75 | 0.64 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 32.47 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1031.5% | -1031.5% | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -896.1% | -896.1% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -27.1% | -27.1% | -95.0% | — | — |
| ROA | -24.7% | -24.7% | -37.0% | -235.0% | -139.7% |
| ROIC | -210.2% | -210.2% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -30.7% | -30.7% | -52.4% | — | -177.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.67 | -1.07 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -114.65 | -114.65 | -29.04 | -7.19 | -163.82 |
Net cash position: cash ($189M) exceeds total debt ($6M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 14.24 | 14.24 | 12.86 | 0.44 | 4.78 |
| Quick Ratio | 14.24 | 14.24 | 12.86 | 0.44 | 4.78 |
| Cash Ratio | 13.96 | 13.96 | 12.76 | 0.37 | 4.72 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.20 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $36M | $36M | $34M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BIOA stock.
BioAge Labs Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
BioAge Labs Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -27.1%. The historical average is -61.0%.
Based on historical data, BioAge Labs Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BioAge Labs Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -1031.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway under four quarters
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Book Discount Against Meaningless Revenue Multiple
At a 0.78 price-to-book multiple against a negative TTM P/E of -2.65, BIOA trades below the stated value of its equity, yet the 24.86x price-to-sales ratio, per current market pricing data, reflects a revenue base too immaterial to anchor a durable multiple.
The P/B discount versus platform peers such as KYMR at 6.54x and RVMD at 22.00x appears to reflect the market's judgment that much of BIOA's book value — largely cash drawn down to $74.0M by 2026Q2 — is being consumed rather than compounded. Because forward P/E, EV/EBITDA and PEG are all unavailable, investors are effectively pricing the pipeline optionality directly against remaining cash, which suggests the equity could re-rate violently in either direction on a single clinical readout rather than on fundamental progression.
Gross Margin Artifact Masks Operating Erosion
BIOA's 100.0% gross margin in 2026Q2 appears to be an accounting artifact of milestone recognition rather than pricing power, while the operating margin of -12.0% and net margin of -10.6% better capture a cost base that materially exceeds revenue, as reported in recent financial statements.
With quarterly revenue of roughly $2.5M against operating losses that have widened to -$29.3M, the gross margin line conveys almost no analytical information, since there is effectively no cost of goods attached to collaboration income. The most reliable indicator of true earning power here is the trajectory of operating margin, which deteriorated from -9.2% in 2025Q4 to -12.0% in 2026Q2, implying negative operating leverage rather than the operating leverage investors typically underwrite in commercial-stage biotech. Adjusting for stock-based compensation of $4.3M per quarter, which inflated reported losses beyond cash outflows, the core economic deficit still appears dominated by R&D rather than one-off items.
Improving ROIC Driven By Shrinking Capital Base
BIOA's ROIC improved sharply from -56.7% in 2025Q1 to -9.9% in 2026Q2, though this appears to reflect a shrinking invested capital base as cash is drawn down rather than any genuine improvement in return generation, based on reported ratio disclosures.
Asset turnover of 0.01 across all reported quarters confirms that the company is generating essentially no revenue per dollar of assets, meaning any ROIC improvement is denominator-driven as the $354.3M peak cash position is spent down toward $74.0M. ROA has similarly narrowed from -12.6% in 2024Q1 to -6.6% in 2026Q2, which on its face looks like stabilization but may simply track the same asset shrinkage. On this trajectory, ROIC should not be interpreted as a compounding signal; investors should monitor whether absolute operating losses stabilize, since that is the only condition under which the ratio would become meaningful.
Headline Liquidity Ratios Mask Runway Compression
Despite a current ratio of 17.19 in 2026Q2 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01, BIOA's cash position has fallen approximately 79% from its 2024Q4 peak, implying a runway of only three to four quarters at the reported burn rate, as indicated in quarterly SEC filings.
The quick ratio of 17.19, identical to the current ratio, indicates negligible inventory reliance, which is consistent with a milestone-driven model, but this metric offers no protection against cash exhaustion since nearly all current assets are depleting cash. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 and near-absent interest burden — reflected in the distorted negative interest coverage figures — point to a balance sheet with no near-term financing obligation, though that is characteristic of pre-commercial biotech access to capital rather than deliberate capital structure discipline. Investors should monitor the decline in deferred revenue from $12.5M to $4.4M as a leading indicator that milestone-linked liquidity infusions are not being replenished.
P/B Discount Is The Most Misleading Signal
The 0.78 price-to-book multiple is the ratio most commonly misapplied to BIOA's business model, as it implies a distressed-asset discount while ignoring that the book value it references is a rapidly depleting cash pile rather than a productive operating asset base.
For a commercial-stage company, trading below book would signal market undervaluation of tangible assets; for BIOA, where accumulated deficit stands at -$381.8M and quarterly cash burn approximates $19.6M, the same discount may instead reflect the market pricing in the pace at which book value is being consumed before any commercial traction emerges. A more appropriate analytical frame would be an enterprise-value-adjusted cash position combined with a probability-weighted pipeline valuation, which would separate residual net cash from speculative pipeline value rather than blending them into a single book figure. Relying on P/B alone risks characterizing BIOA as cheap relative to peers like KYMR and RVMD, when the underlying assets and their burn profiles are not comparable.