Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.3x · EV/EBITDA 12.9x · ROE 14.4%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $57.6B | $45.3B | $41.1B | $34.7B | $29.1B | $19.8B | $14.1B | $14.3B | $9.3B | $13.5B | $19.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $61.0B | $48.7B | $43.7B | $38.1B | $33.3B | $22.7B | $17.6B | $17.6B | $12.9B | $14.8B | $18.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.32 | 17.52 | 13.77 | 17.90 | — | — | — | 111.43 | 47.78 | — | 48.38 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.08 | 1.63 | 1.48 | 1.36 | 1.38 | 0.97 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.79 | 1.47 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.03 | 2.38 | 2.41 | 2.24 | 2.01 | 1.18 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 1.32 |
| P/FCF | 22.71 | 17.84 | 19.99 | 18.88 | 26.12 | 10.82 | 27.22 | 12.41 | 12.15 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 15.12 | 11.88 | 12.32 | 11.33 | 15.44 | 8.35 | 10.79 | 6.71 | 5.29 | — | 74.64 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.76 | 1.57 | 1.49 | 1.57 | 1.11 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.86 | 1.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.86 | 10.26 | 9.68 | 10.21 | 11.29 | 9.40 | 8.84 | 7.08 | 5.91 | 18.11 | 18.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.16 | 15.71 | 12.62 | 13.26 | 121.59 | 31.22 | 26.15 | 17.83 | 16.92 | — | 27.48 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.19 | 21.29 | 20.71 | 29.85 | 12.38 | 33.99 | 15.35 | 16.85 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 23.6% | 23.3% | 23.1% | 23.4% | 22.1% | 18.0% | 18.6% | 17.4% | 17.7% | 23.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 10.4% | 8.9% | 6.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 3.1% | -1.7% | 3.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 10.7% | 7.6% | -2.8% | -1.1% | -48.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | -0.4% | 1.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.4% | 14.4% | 18.3% | 12.9% | -3.8% | -1.3% | -37.7% | 0.4% | 0.5% | -0.2% | 1.7% |
| ROA | 6.5% | 6.5% | 7.9% | 5.5% | -1.7% | -0.6% | -21.8% | 0.2% | 0.4% | -0.2% | 1.1% |
| ROIC | 12.7% | 12.7% | 13.1% | 10.5% | 7.4% | 4.8% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 1.3% | -0.8% | 2.5% |
| ROCE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 13.7% | 11.2% | 7.7% | 4.8% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 1.5% | -0.9% | 2.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.33 | 1.62 | 2.26 | 2.79 | 3.84 | 2.66 | 3.35 | 10.19 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.03 | -0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.91 | 1.41 | 1.19 | 1.76 | 1.35 | 1.65 | 1.61 | -0.70 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.35 | 1.29 | 1.84 | 3.74 | 1.57 | 6.77 | 2.93 | 4.70 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 13.96 | 13.96 | 17.49 | 13.29 | 1.09 | 2.43 | 2.55 | 4.18 | 3.43 | -1.64 | 6.73 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.32 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.65 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 1.66 | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 1.51 | 0.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.76 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.28 | 4.28 | 4.31 | 3.85 | 3.53 | 4.01 | 3.84 | 4.21 | 4.09 | 3.14 | 3.14 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 87.40 | 93.41 | 101.25 | 102.79 | 100.61 | 99.11 | 98.24 | 95.23 | 127.80 | 70.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 1.1% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 35.2% | 35.2% | 28.1% | 40.5% | — | — | — | 308.6% | 161.5% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 5.6% | — | — | — | 0.9% | 2.1% | — | 2.1% |
| FCF Yield | 4.4% | 5.6% | 5.0% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 9.2% | 3.7% | 8.1% | 8.2% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 26.7% | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.2% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.8% | 5.3% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 4.5% | 30.1% | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $994M | $1.0B | $1.0B | $987M | $824M | $675M | $557M | $433M | $427M | $430M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BKR stock.
Baker Hughes Company's current P/E ratio is 22.3x. The historical average is 42.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Baker Hughes Company's current EV/EBITDA is 12.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
Baker Hughes Company's return on equity (ROE) is 14.4%. The historical average is 0.1%.
Based on historical data, Baker Hughes Company is trading at a P/E of 22.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Baker Hughes Company's current dividend yield is 1.58% with a payout ratio of 35.2%.
Baker Hughes Company has 23.6% gross margin and 12.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Baker Hughes Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Stagnant revenue growth persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Amid Flat Revenue
Gross margin improved to 23.4% in 2026Q2 from 20.8% a year earlier, per reported figures, while operating margin held at 12.7%, indicating cost discipline and mix shift toward higher-margin industrial technology.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from 19.9% in 2024Q1 to 23.4% in 2026Q2 suggests that the revenue mix is shifting toward the IET segment's proprietary turbomachinery, which carries premium pricing. Operating margin stability at around 12-13% despite flat revenue implies that SG&A leverage is limited, as SG&A as a percentage of revenue rose to 8.5% in 2026Q2. Net margin volatility, spiking to 14.1% in 2026Q1, likely reflects one-time tax benefits, so investors should focus on gross and operating margins as the cleaner indicators of underlying earning power.
ROIC Stuck in Low Single Digits
ROIC has remained between 2.6% and 3.6% over the past ten quarters, per financial statements, despite a fortress balance sheet, suggesting that the company is not yet compounding returns on its expanded capital base.
The stability of ROIC around 3% is notably below the cost of capital, implying that the massive cash build and debt issuance have not yet translated into productive investments. ROE has also been subdued, ranging from 2.3% to 7.1%, with the 2026Q2 figure of 3.4% reflecting a temporary dip. This suggests that while the balance sheet is strong, the company is in a transition phase where capital is being accumulated for future deployment, but current returns are not yet demonstrating value creation.
Working Capital Drag Persists
Cash conversion cycle averaged 101 days over the last ten quarters, per reported data, with DSO at 90 days in 2026Q2, indicating that project-based revenue recognition and collection timing continue to tie up cash.
The CCC has remained elevated, fluctuating between 92 and 111 days, with no clear downward trend, suggesting that working capital management is not improving despite operational discipline. DSO of 90 days is high relative to peers, reflecting the long-cycle nature of turbomachinery contracts and potential delays in customer payments. DPO of 77 days provides some offset, but the net effect is a persistent cash conversion lag that contributes to quarterly cash flow volatility, as seen in the swing from 2.5% FCF margin in 2026Q1 to 15.5% in 2026Q2.
Debt Surge Offset by Cash Buffer
Debt-to-equity jumped to 0.81 in 2026Q2 from 0.39 in 2024Q1, per SEC filings, but cash covers 96% of total debt, and interest coverage remains comfortable at 14.5x, indicating manageable leverage.
The doubling of total debt to $16.3B appears to be a strategic move to bolster liquidity, as cash increased by $13B over the same period. While D/EBITDA spiked to 16.97 in 2026Q2, this is distorted by the cash build and may not reflect true credit risk; net debt is likely minimal. Interest coverage of 14.5x suggests that debt service is not a near-term concern, but investors should monitor whether the new debt is used for value-accretive investments or simply sits on the balance sheet, as the current ROIC does not yet justify the increased leverage.
Fortress Liquidity Masks Operational Stagnation
Current ratio improved to 2.09 in 2026Q2 from 1.25 in 2024Q1, per reported data, with cash representing 30% of total assets, providing a substantial cushion against operational shocks.
The liquidity position is exceptionally strong, with a quick ratio of 1.76 indicating that even without inventory, the company can cover short-term obligations. This fortress-like balance sheet suggests that BKR is well-positioned to weather downturns or fund strategic M&A. However, the cash pile also highlights the lack of growth opportunities, as revenue has been stagnant for several quarters. The high liquidity may be a sign of capital being parked rather than deployed, which could pressure returns if not addressed.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
The EV/EBITDA of 13.76 appears elevated versus peers, but the massive cash balance distorts EV, and the forward EV/EBITDA of 9.05 suggests the market is pricing in margin expansion, not current earnings power.
Analysts often compare BKR's EV/EBITDA to oilfield service peers like SLB and HAL, but this is misleading because BKR's balance sheet holds $13B in cash, which reduces EV and makes the multiple appear lower than it is. Conversely, the trailing EV/EBITDA of 13.76 is higher than peers, but this reflects the depressed EBITDA due to stagnant revenue. The forward multiple of 9.05 implies that the market expects EBITDA to grow significantly, likely from LNG and data center orders. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBIT or P/E, which better captures the earnings power of the industrial technology segment, but even these are distorted by one-time items. Investors should adjust for the cash pile and use a sum-of-the-parts valuation to separate the cyclical OFSE business from the higher-multiple IET segment.