Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 135.5x · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE 2.3%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $732M | $579M | $1.1B | $2.7B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.7B | $2.5B | $3.3B | $4.6B | $4.1B | $4.1B | $4.0B | $4.4B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 135.50 | 107.61 | — | 11.00 | 20.35 | 10.47 | — | 15.22 | 15.69 | 20.92 | 53.03 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.16 | 1.72 | 7.56 | 6.59 | 7.54 | 10.13 | 151.27 | 11.16 | 26.34 | 35.25 | 9.91 |
| P/FCF | 7.56 | 5.98 | 142.54 | 10.85 | 12.06 | 8.08 | 32.50 | 12.73 | 21.08 | 14.34 | 25.76 |
| P/OCF | 2.65 | 2.09 | 4.62 | 5.10 | 5.28 | 5.61 | 11.94 | 6.24 | 5.84 | 5.20 | 6.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.64 | 0.82 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.26 | 1.07 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.92 | 7.47 | 10.33 | 10.25 | 9.08 | 8.77 | 755.35 | 11.39 | 7.80 | 9.21 | 9.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 16.57 | 78.36 | 860.73 | 16.36 | 22.92 | 13.50 | — | 23.13 | 18.63 | 20.44 | 30.74 |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.25 | 440.67 | 18.53 | 24.19 | 14.82 | 78.31 | 28.37 | 33.89 | 21.01 | 37.79 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.9% | 8.9% | 70.9% | 17.3% | 16.8% | 17.7% | 10.6% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.6% | 16.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 6.8% | 7.6% | 7.5% | -5.5% | 4.6% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -3.2% | 5.9% | 2.5% | 5.2% | -5.0% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 1.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.3% | 2.3% | -46.4% | 72.1% | 41.0% | 184.4% | -168.5% | 108.2% | 172.4% | 74.7% | 13.0% |
| ROA | 0.2% | 0.2% | -3.8% | 7.3% | 3.1% | 6.5% | -4.6% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| ROIC | 5.3% | 5.3% | 4.5% | 9.1% | 10.3% | 10.4% | -5.3% | 7.7% | 10.2% | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| ROCE | 6.9% | 6.9% | 5.8% | 11.9% | 13.2% | 13.1% | -6.9% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 8.3% | 6.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 6.00 | 6.00 | 16.31 | 4.93 | 7.89 | 8.85 | 223.31 | 14.10 | 17.13 | 18.52 | 5.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.94 | 5.94 | 7.21 | 4.49 | 4.74 | 4.18 | 462.70 | 6.45 | 3.16 | 3.30 | 3.39 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 5.82 | 15.81 | 4.66 | 7.58 | 8.46 | 213.27 | 13.72 | 16.01 | 16.40 | 4.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.77 | 5.77 | 6.99 | 4.25 | 4.56 | 3.99 | 441.90 | 6.28 | 2.95 | 2.93 | 2.99 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 20.27 | 298.13 | 7.68 | 12.13 | 6.74 | 45.81 | 15.64 | 12.81 | 6.67 | 12.03 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.06 | 5.43 | 3.39 | 5.33 | -2.72 | 3.88 | 3.23 | 3.68 | 2.15 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.47 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.25 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.25 | 0.94 | 1.15 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | 58.62 | 58.62 | 16.71 | 54.79 | 42.68 | 42.86 | 45.77 | 39.92 | 47.52 | 68.58 | 54.55 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 9.43 | 10.59 | 8.22 | 12.01 | 10.90 | 11.91 | 12.44 | 10.81 | 9.59 | 11.58 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.3% | 6.6% | 7.8% | 3.1% | 2.4% | — | 1.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 711.3% | 711.3% | — | 33.9% | 48.8% | — | — | 27.4% | 31.1% | 30.9% | 75.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.7% | 0.9% | — | 9.1% | 4.9% | 9.5% | — | 6.6% | 6.4% | 4.8% | 1.9% |
| FCF Yield | 13.2% | 16.7% | 0.7% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 12.4% | 3.1% | 7.9% | 4.7% | 7.0% | 3.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 25.4% | 2.6% | 5.3% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 5.4% | 6.8% | 12.8% | 15.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.3% | 6.6% | 33.2% | 5.7% | 7.7% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 7.2% | 8.8% | 14.3% | 16.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $85M | $86M | $96M | $99M | $108M | $87M | $90M | $94M | $100M | $114M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLMN stock.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 135.5x. The historical average is 29.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.5x.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 2.3%. The historical average is 56.1%.
Based on historical data, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 135.5x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 5.25% with a payout ratio of 711.3%.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. has 8.9% gross margin and 4.1% operating margin.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and thin margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Strain
Gross margin swung from 70.2% in 2025Q4 to 14.0% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, while operating margin remains thin at 3.8%, indicating classification shifts and persistent cost pressures.
The dramatic gross margin oscillation likely reflects accounting reclassifications rather than true cost changes, but the consistently low operating margin (averaging around 4% in recent quarters) suggests limited pricing power and high fixed costs. Net margin of 3.1% in 2026Q2 is an improvement from negative quarters, yet it remains far below peers like Darden's 9.1%, indicating structural profitability challenges. Investors should monitor whether margin recovery is sustainable or merely a result of one-time adjustments.
Leverage Easing but Debt Service Still Heavy
Debt-to-equity improved from 16.31 in 2024Q4 to 4.40 in 2026Q2, as per SEC filings, but interest coverage of 3.43x remains thin relative to operating margin, leaving little room for rate shocks.
The deleveraging trend is positive, but the absolute debt load of $1.9B against equity of $431.8M keeps the balance sheet strained. Interest coverage of 3.43x in 2026Q2 is below the 5.0x seen in 2025Q1, indicating that rising rates or margin compression could quickly erode the cushion. The D/EBITDA of 22.7x is elevated, though this may be distorted by lease capitalization under ASC 842, warranting a closer look at lease-adjusted leverage.
Liquidity Cushion Dangerously Thin
Current ratio stands at 0.25 with quick ratio at 0.18, as reported in recent filings, indicating minimal short-term liquidity buffer against operational disruptions or unexpected cash needs.
With cash of only $66.6M and current liabilities far exceeding current assets, the company appears vulnerable to a sudden downturn or a need for emergency capital. The negative working capital is common in restaurants due to high payable turnover, but the extreme low current ratio suggests reliance on ongoing cash generation and access to credit. This thin liquidity position amplifies the risk of any operational misstep, especially given the volatile FCF margins.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
Cash conversion cycle turned negative at -6 days in 2026Q2, as per financial statements, reflecting favorable payment terms, but asset turnover of 0.33x remains low, indicating inefficient use of assets.
The negative CCC suggests the company is effectively using supplier financing, with DPO of 16 days exceeding DSO and DIO combined. However, asset turnover of 0.33x is below peers like Darden (which typically exceeds 0.8x), implying that BLMN's asset base, including significant lease assets, is not generating sufficient revenue. This inefficiency may be a result of underperforming units or a portfolio of brands that require more capital per dollar of sales.
Returns on Capital Remain Subpar
ROIC of 1.2% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, is far below the cost of capital and peer averages, indicating that the company is not generating adequate returns on its invested capital.
Over the past ten quarters, ROIC has rarely exceeded 2%, with negative readings in several quarters, reflecting a business that is barely covering its capital costs. This is in stark contrast to peers like Darden and Texas Roadhouse, which post ROICs above 14%. The low returns appear driven by thin margins and a heavy asset base, suggesting that management's capital allocation has not created shareholder value. Improvement would require either margin expansion or asset rationalization.
Misapplied Metric: Debt-to-Equity
The commonly cited debt-to-equity ratio of 4.40, as per recent filings, may overstate financial risk because it includes capitalized operating leases under ASC 842, which are not traditional debt.
For restaurant companies, lease obligations are integral to operations, but treating them as debt can distort leverage comparisons. A more appropriate measure would be lease-adjusted leverage, such as debt-to-EBITDA excluding lease liabilities, or using a multiple of rent expense. Additionally, the market may be undervaluing BLMN's sum-of-the-parts, particularly the high-growth Brazilian operations, which are obscured by consolidated financials. Investors should focus on unlevered free cash flow and segment-level returns to assess true earning power.