Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -93.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $7M | $78M | $155M | $355M | $348M | $526M | $166M | $279M | $167M | $98M |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $5M | $75M | $146M | $350M | $346M | $519M | $165M | $278M | $165M | $96M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 14.41 | 29.06 | 18.80 | 48.39 | 78.62 | 31.89 | 50.15 | 28.76 | 18.99 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.98 | 1.71 | 11.84 | 13.23 | 42.63 | 37.75 | 37.02 | 41.65 | 64.51 | 37.11 | 18.70 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.95 | 13.79 | 27.44 | 18.56 | 48.03 | 77.60 | 31.75 | 49.93 | 28.55 | 18.62 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.4% | 9.4% | 11.3% | 8.4% | 15.8% | 5.1% | 26.6% | 24.8% | 31.5% | 34.9% | 29.7% |
| Operating Margin | -96.7% | -96.7% | -117.6% | -135.3% | -24.0% | -104.2% | -35.9% | -46.4% | -26.6% | -16.5% | -16.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -93.6% | -93.6% | -110.4% | -133.7% | -24.0% | -103.4% | -34.9% | -46.0% | -26.3% | -15.7% | -29.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -93.0% | -93.0% | -65.3% | -71.2% | -51.6% | -63.5% | -25.7% | -57.6% | -33.3% | -18.7% | -27.7% |
| ROA | -65.4% | -65.4% | -50.4% | -55.3% | -39.1% | -51.2% | -20.8% | -45.7% | -28.6% | -16.9% | -25.3% |
| ROIC | -143.5% | -143.5% | -151.8% | -157.6% | -65.2% | -80.3% | -33.9% | -56.4% | -34.8% | -21.7% | -15.8% |
| ROCE | -91.3% | -91.3% | -65.1% | -66.0% | -45.6% | -57.0% | -24.3% | -58.1% | -33.6% | -19.7% | -15.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.13 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.47 | -0.51 | -0.74 | -0.55 | -0.28 | -0.48 | -0.17 | -0.28 | -0.27 | -0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | -20252.94 | -259073.89 | -50399.49 | -38756.51 | -3220.85 | -4765.39 |
Net cash position: cash ($2M) exceeds total debt ($458000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.80 | 2.80 | 3.51 | 6.58 | 4.69 | 7.10 | 10.00 | 3.56 | 5.00 | 7.96 | 9.55 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.95 | 1.95 | 2.43 | 5.52 | 3.49 | 4.63 | 8.07 | 1.85 | 2.57 | 4.69 | 5.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.89 | 5.00 | 2.94 | 3.23 | 5.85 | 0.54 | 1.34 | 2.32 | 3.73 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 1.66 | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 1.15 | 0.90 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.23 | 3.23 | 2.02 | 2.38 | 6.58 | 2.13 | 1.72 | 1.82 | 1.75 | 2.18 | 1.94 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.24 | 63.83 | 49.36 | 14.97 | 73.77 | 96.31 | 102.09 | 52.47 | 66.80 | 68.85 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $17M | $14M | $13M | $12M | $10M | $9M | $9M | $8M | $8M |
Capital exhaustion and liquidity
Based on reported figures, Biomerica trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.02, a valuation that appears to reflect the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to successfully transition its legacy diagnostic business into a viable, high-growth platform for the InFoods therapeutic system.
The absence of a positive P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple suggests that investors are currently valuing the firm as a speculative clinical-stage entity rather than an established medical device manufacturer. This valuation level implies that the market is heavily discounting future cash flows, likely due to the persistent operating losses and the significant uncertainty surrounding the commercial adoption of the InFoods platform.
According to historical financial data, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -44.8% in 2026Q3, which indicates that the capital deployed into the business is currently failing to generate any economic return, let alone cover the firm's cost of capital.
The consistent decay in ROIC over the last ten quarters highlights a structural inability to convert R&D and operational spending into profitable growth. This trend suggests that the current business model is value-destructive, and investors should monitor whether the pivot to InFoods can eventually reverse this trajectory or if it will continue to erode the remaining equity base.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has remained elevated at 160 days in 2026Q3, reflecting significant challenges in managing inventory turnover and collecting receivables within the current, highly transactional and low-volume diagnostic kit business model.
The high DIO of 138 days suggests that inventory is moving slowly, which poses a risk of obsolescence for diagnostic kits that may have limited shelf lives. This inefficiency in working capital management exacerbates the company's cash burn, as capital remains trapped in unsold products rather than being available to fund the critical clinical validation of the InFoods platform.
Based on the company's balance sheet data, the current ratio has declined to 2.64 in 2026Q3, which, while appearing superficially adequate, masks a rapid depletion of cash reserves that may leave the firm vulnerable to liquidity stress if operating losses continue at current levels.
The quick ratio of 1.59 further highlights the company's reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which is concerning given the slow inventory turnover observed. Investors should monitor the cash runway closely, as the current burn rate suggests that the company may be forced to seek dilutive financing to maintain its operations in the near term.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to Biomerica, as it obscures the company's negative gross margins and high cash burn, which render traditional revenue-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant for assessing the firm's true financial viability or its path to sustainable profitability.
Because the company is in a transitional phase where revenue is declining and costs are not scaling, the P/S ratio fails to capture the underlying risk of capital exhaustion. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the progress of clinical milestones, as these are the primary determinants of the company's survival, rather than top-line revenue figures that do not reflect operational health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BMRA stock.
Biomerica, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. The historical average is 105.0x.
Biomerica, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -93.0%. The historical average is -17.3%.
Based on historical data, Biomerica, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Biomerica, Inc. has 9.4% gross margin and -96.7% operating margin.