Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 43.7x · EV/EBITDA 22.3x · ROE 10.8%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.2B | $8.2B | $3.3B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $15.8B | $10.8B | $6.1B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 43.71 | 43.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.29 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 7.82 | 4.36 | 1.99 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 26.76 | 20.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 26.89 | 16.79 | 138.25 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.84 | 0.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.28 | 23.61 | 14.92 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 53.51 | 36.75 | 31.66 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.8% | 11.8% | 14.1% | 16.2% | 17.5% | 18.6% | 18.8% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 2.4% | 3.5% | 3.0% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.5% | 1.5% | -0.2% | -1.8% | -0.7% | 0.7% | 0.4% | -1.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.8% | 10.8% | -1.6% | -22.1% | -6.8% | 6.5% | 2.9% | -10.2% |
| ROA | 3.1% | 3.1% | -0.3% | -2.8% | -1.0% | 1.0% | 0.5% | -1.9% |
| ROIC | 4.9% | 4.9% | 3.5% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| ROCE | 6.5% | 6.5% | 4.7% | 3.3% | 4.1% | 5.6% | 4.7% | 2.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.76 | 5.99 | 4.69 | 4.71 | 4.04 | 3.44 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.89 | 5.89 | 7.07 | 10.50 | 9.39 | 8.70 | 8.58 | 11.20 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.39 | 1.72 | 5.97 | 4.67 | 4.65 | 3.69 | 3.41 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.70 | 5.70 | 6.92 | 10.46 | 9.35 | 8.59 | 7.82 | 11.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.64 | — | 26.65 | — | 17.66 | 15.89 | 40.63 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.88 | 1.88 | 0.85 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 1.42 | 1.19 | 0.38 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.33 | 1.17 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 1.74 | 1.40 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 1.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.01 | 1.90 | 1.60 | 1.42 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.19 |
| Inventory Turnover | 13.98 | 13.98 | 15.11 | 18.35 | 14.79 | 18.21 | 15.10 | 18.60 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.31 | 37.23 | 41.80 | 41.05 | 43.87 | 45.84 | 50.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 2.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 4.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $220M | $193M | $171M | $171M | $171M | $171M | $171M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BTSG stock.
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock's current P/E ratio is 43.7x. The historical average is 43.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock's current EV/EBITDA is 22.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.3x.
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock's return on equity (ROE) is 10.8%. The historical average is -2.9%.
Based on historical data, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock is trading at a P/E of 43.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock has 11.8% gross margin and 2.3% operating margin.
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin margins against elevated leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Imply Sustained Growth Expectations
According to the supplied market data, BTSG trades at a trailing P/E of 75.70 and a forward P/E of 36.11, a premium to peers ENSG at 31.23 and ADUS at 24.34 that implies investors expect substantial earnings expansion from current thin net margins of 1.5 percent.
The gap between trailing and forward P/E, roughly 2.1x, suggests the market expects earnings to rise sharply as acquisition integration and margin normalization take hold. The PEG of 1.56 indicates the growth premium is not fully extended relative to reported 14.6 percent revenue growth, though this depends on whether that growth converts into operating income. EV/EBITDA of 33.83 versus a forward figure of 17.89 reinforces this expectation, and investors should monitor whether EBITDA delivery keeps pace with the forward estimate.
Operating Margin Recovery Remains Incomplete
Based on the quarterly ratio data, BTSG's operating margin rose from 1.5 percent in 2025Q2 to 3.8 percent in 2026Q3 while gross margin hovered near 12 to 13 percent, indicating the improvement has come mainly from overhead control rather than pricing or mix.
Gross margin has been essentially flat across the ten quarters, which suggests the operating margin improvement reflects overhead leverage rather than structurally better unit economics. Net margin of 2.4 percent in the latest quarter remains thin, leaving limited room to absorb clinical wage inflation or reimbursement changes. Investors should treat the recent operating margin gain as encouraging but not yet proof of durable earning power.
ROIC Recovering From Near-Zero Base
As reported in financial statements, BTSG's ROIC improved from 0.7 percent in 2024Q2 to 3.1 percent in 2026Q3 and ROE rose from negative 0.5 percent to 4.7 percent over the same span, a meaningful but still modest return profile.
Even at the latest level, ROIC of 3.1 percent appears low relative to the peer group, where ADUS reports 8.8 percent, suggesting the company has not yet earned returns clearly above its cost of capital. The trajectory is favorable and consistent with the rebuilding of equity, but much of the ROE improvement may reflect a larger equity base rather than higher earnings per dollar of capital. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustainably exceed the mid-single-digit range.
Coverage Improving but Debt Burden Persists
According to the reported figures, BTSG's interest coverage rose from 0.89 in 2024Q2 to 5.17 in 2026Q3 and debt-to-equity fell from 1.81 to 1.09, yet debt-to-EBITDA remains elevated at 11.96 on the latest quarter.
The improvement in interest coverage is substantial and suggests debt service has become considerably more comfortable as operating income has grown. However, the debt-to-EBITDA figure of nearly 12 times indicates the absolute debt load remains heavy relative to earnings, and the deleveraging appears driven more by equity growth than debt reduction. Refinancing exposure and covenant headroom are not disclosed in the supplied data and warrant further investigation.
Cash Rebuild Strengthens Near-Term Position
Based on reported figures, BTSG's current ratio held between 1.57 and 1.79 across recent quarters and the quick ratio improved to 1.22 in 2026Q3, suggesting the near-term liquidity buffer has strengthened versus the sub-1.0 quick ratio seen in late 2024.
A quick ratio above 1.2 indicates the company can meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory liquidation, a meaningful improvement given the earlier dip below 1.0. Inventory dependence is modest, with DIO around 15 to 21 days, so the quick and current ratios largely converge. Under severe stress, the position would depend on sustained collections, since DSO of 28 to 30 days makes receivables a key source of liquidity.
Misapplied Multiple Obscures Lease and Amortization Effects
Trailing P/E is the ratio most often misapplied to BTSG, since GAAP net income of 1.5 percent margins is depressed by acquisition amortization and volatile non-operating items, as reflected in the quarterly swing from an $8.2 million loss to $100.1 million profit.
Using trailing P/E of 75.70 as a valuation anchor may overstate how expensive the stock is, because amortization from the PharMerica integration and tax effects can suppress reported earnings without affecting cash generation. A more informative approach would pair EV/EBITDA with free cash flow yield, adjusting for acquisition-related outflows that headline free cash flow does not capture. Investors should treat the trailing multiple as a noisy signal and anchor analysis on normalized cash earnings instead.