Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 30.6x · EV/EBITDA 15.9x · ROE N/A. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $51.8B | $48.3B | $40.7B | $24.3B | $24.8B | $14.6B | $16.8B | $15.3B | $14.2B | $15.4B | $24.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $56.9B | $53.4B | $46.1B | $24.8B | $25.9B | $15.7B | $20.1B | $19.3B | $19.7B | $22.6B | $28.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 30.60 | 120.88 | 26.05 | 28.50 | 75.06 | — | 27.45 | — | 10.40 | 60.28 | 19.33 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.20 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.19 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.36 | 8.53 | 2.24 | 2.54 | 3.65 |
| P/FCF | 11.45 | 10.67 | 21.98 | 7.47 | 10.49 | 5.33 | 8.27 | 9.65 | 5.92 | 6.45 | 31.29 |
| P/OCF | 10.02 | 9.33 | 16.96 | 6.46 | 8.71 | 4.67 | 6.91 | 7.80 | 5.21 | 5.56 | 21.06 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.84 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.95 | 62.81 | 15.05 | 12.68 | 17.92 | 184.37 | 16.01 | — | 6.43 | 19.54 | 10.03 |
| EV / EBIT | 78.07 | 84.34 | 19.92 | 19.78 | 34.64 | — | 39.95 | — | 9.62 | 224.07 | 13.39 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.80 | 24.93 | 7.62 | 10.95 | 5.73 | 9.90 | 12.17 | 8.22 | 9.49 | 35.70 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 3.8% | 4.0% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 3.6% | 4.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.4% | -0.3% | 0.3% | -2.7% | 1.4% | 0.1% | 1.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.2% | -0.5% | 0.4% | -2.4% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | -172.4% | 34.1% | -90.9% | 22.0% | 4.0% | 19.2% |
| ROA | 3.0% | 0.7% | 3.2% | 1.9% | 0.8% | -2.1% | 1.4% | -9.0% | 3.4% | 0.6% | 3.5% |
| ROIC | 82.8% | 21.0% | 3378.7% | — | — | -16.6% | 6.5% | -34.9% | 12.3% | 0.8% | 15.8% |
| ROCE | 19.5% | 5.3% | 19.2% | 13.0% | 6.6% | -4.0% | 2.8% | -24.1% | 12.1% | 0.7% | 12.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.74 | 3.78 | 1.27 | 1.49 | 1.52 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.79 | 11.70 | 3.05 | 2.87 | 3.58 | 68.29 | 5.35 | — | 2.62 | 7.78 | 3.66 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.84 | 2.23 | 0.87 | 1.20 | 0.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.43 | 5.99 | 1.78 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 12.80 | 2.64 | — | 1.80 | 6.26 | 1.24 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.13 | 2.96 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 1.63 | 2.53 | 2.30 | 3.04 | 4.41 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.25 | 8.01 | 10.77 | 24.55 | 8.89 | -4.33 | 2.79 | -14.85 | 6.96 | 0.31 | 10.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.32 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.11 | 4.19 | 5.03 | 4.73 | 4.13 | 3.65 | 3.75 | 3.55 | 3.42 | 3.24 |
| Inventory Turnover | 14.13 | 3.53 | 12.74 | 14.67 | 12.29 | 11.18 | 10.67 | 11.07 | 10.82 | 10.53 | 10.92 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 79.19 | 21.72 | 19.45 | 19.78 | 21.28 | 20.45 | 19.72 | 21.19 | 20.81 | 22.60 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 4.1% | 3.8% | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 28.6% | 123.4% | 31.6% | 58.6% | 159.1% | — | 93.8% | — | 42.3% | 227.0% | 44.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.3% | 0.8% | 3.8% | 3.5% | 1.3% | — | 3.6% | — | 9.6% | 1.7% | 5.2% |
| FCF Yield | 8.7% | 9.4% | 4.6% | 13.4% | 9.5% | 18.8% | 12.1% | 10.4% | 16.9% | 15.5% | 3.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.6% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 3.1% | 8.1% | 6.9% | 1.2% | 2.3% | 4.2% | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.6% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 5.1% | 10.2% | 10.7% | 4.6% | 6.0% | 8.3% | 7.4% | 4.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $235M | $242M | $247M | $262M | $279M | $294M | $293M | $301M | $315M | $320M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CAH stock.
Cardinal Health, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 30.6x. The historical average is 27.5x. This places it at the 86th percentile of its historical range.
Cardinal Health, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.8x.
Based on historical data, Cardinal Health, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 30.6x. This is at the 86th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cardinal Health, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.94% with a payout ratio of 28.6%.
Cardinal Health, Inc. has 3.8% gross margin and 1.0% operating margin.
Cardinal Health, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage and margin vulnerability
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Thin Margins Show Incremental Recovery
Cardinal Health's gross margin improved to 4.3% in 2026Q4, as per ratio data, up from a trough of 3.1% in 2024Q3, yet remains structurally low due to the high-cost distribution model with limited pricing power.
The expansion in gross margin, alongside a doubling of operating margin to 1.1%, suggests that cost discipline and favorable product mix are providing modest relief in an inherently constrained profitability profile. However, the minimal buffer of approximately 300 basis points between gross and operating margins indicates that any adverse shift in regulatory policies, generic pricing, or logistics costs could rapidly erode earnings power.
Volatile Capital Efficiency Amid Integration
ROIC exhibited wide swings, peaking at 47.1% in 2025Q2 before settling at 23.4% in 2026Q4 based on reported figures, implying that capital efficiency is heavily influenced by non-recurring working capital adjustments and acquisition-related timing.
The volatility in ROIC appears driven more by changes in inventory and receivables management than by sustainable improvements in core operational returns, as evidenced by the inconsistent correlation with net margin trends. Investors should monitor for stabilization above the 20% level as a potential indicator of compounding capability, but the erratic pattern suggests that integration of acquired assets remains a headwind to predictable capital deployment.
Debt Burden Compounded by Equity Deficit
With D/EBITDA at 9.57 in 2026Q4, as shown in the ratio table, and negative shareholder equity persisting, Cardinal Health's leverage profile is elevated but interest coverage remains adequate, warranting scrutiny of refinancing risk in a rising rate environment.
The negative equity base renders traditional leverage ratios meaningless, shifting focus to D/EBITDA and interest coverage, which have normalized from extreme levels but still indicate substantial debt reliance. The company's ability to service debt appears stable based on current EBITDA generation, yet the high absolute debt load increases vulnerability to operational downturns or credit market tightening, particularly as acquisitions have fueled balance sheet expansion.
Operational Liquidity Strained but Managed
The current ratio has averaged 0.92 over the past ten quarters according to financial statements, signaling a persistent reliance on continuous cash flow generation to meet short-term obligations due to negative working capital financing.
This liquidity structure, characterized by a quick ratio below 0.5 and a negative cash conversion cycle, indicates that Cardinal Health effectively uses supplier credit to fund operations, a common distribution model that enhances cash efficiency but heightens dependence on the creditworthiness of its vendor base. Any disruption in payment terms or unexpected inventory demands could strain this model, as evidenced by historical working capital swings that have periodically overwhelmed operating cash flow.
The Debt-to-Equity Ratio's Analytical Pitfall
The debt-to-equity ratio is fundamentally misapplied to Cardinal Health given its negative shareholder equity of $2.9B as of 2026Q4, which obscures the true extent of creditor exposure and should be replaced with cash flow-based leverage metrics.
Analysts often default to D/E for leverage assessment, but in this case, the metric is distorted by historical losses and capital returns, rendering it useless for evaluating financial health. Alternative metrics like net debt to EBITDA or interest coverage ratios are more appropriate, as they focus on the company's ability to service debt from operational earnings rather than relying on a balance sheet equity figure that is structurally deficient.