Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.7x · EV/EBITDA 13.0x · ROE 34.0%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.0B | $3.7B | $3.9B | $2.8B | $1.8B | $3.9B | $3.6B | $4.0B | $3.8B | $3.2B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.0B | $3.7B | $3.8B | $2.7B | $1.4B | $3.8B | $3.5B | $4.0B | $3.8B | $3.2B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.72 | 24.74 | 182.70 | 127.16 | 9.28 | — | 46.66 | 95.08 | 59.18 | 249.83 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.14 | 3.95 | 4.34 | 3.02 | 1.08 | 4.14 | 6.55 | 6.78 | 8.42 | 10.24 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 7.90 | 9.92 | 7.17 | 4.47 | 2.33 | 5.80 | 9.67 | 15.54 | 19.70 | 25.55 | — |
| P/FCF | 10.22 | 12.84 | 21.53 | 33.11 | 7.52 | 46.68 | 24.21 | 71.40 | 86.42 | 177.17 | — |
| P/OCF | 10.00 | 12.57 | 15.20 | 22.15 | 7.01 | 40.09 | 23.05 | 56.91 | 73.93 | 126.33 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.95 | 4.22 | 2.91 | 0.84 | 3.97 | 6.33 | 6.79 | 8.34 | 9.97 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.02 | 16.37 | 97.27 | 32.82 | 8.44 | 19.00 | 33.38 | 94.93 | 118.74 | 165.60 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 15.19 | 18.30 | 25.50 | 51.50 | 12.50 | 25.30 | 35.72 | 116.55 | 148.68 | 199.03 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.85 | 20.92 | 31.95 | 5.83 | 44.77 | 23.40 | 71.57 | 85.63 | 172.38 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.0% | 89.0% | 82.6% | 71.3% | 39.7% | 69.1% | 92.3% | 93.8% | 94.5% | 94.4% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 20.7% | 1.5% | 3.6% | 6.6% | 15.6% | 17.7% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 4.8% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.6% | 16.6% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 11.7% | 11.5% | 14.1% | 7.2% | 14.4% | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 34.0% | 34.0% | 3.6% | 4.5% | 26.7% | 20.7% | 24.6% | 18.7% | 40.6% | 13.8% | 10.7% |
| ROA | 21.0% | 21.0% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 20.9% | 15.2% | 17.3% | 12.7% | 29.3% | 9.5% | 7.3% |
| ROIC | 36.2% | 36.2% | 2.1% | 5.5% | 18.4% | 28.8% | 28.2% | 12.1% | 17.5% | 30.7% | 41.3% |
| ROCE | 30.1% | 30.1% | 1.7% | 4.0% | 13.7% | 24.8% | 25.9% | 13.1% | 13.7% | 14.9% | 12.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.27 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.84 | 4.97 | 2.40 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 1.65 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | -0.21 | -0.16 | -0.52 | -0.24 | -0.32 | 0.04 | -0.18 | -0.69 | -0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.00 | 0.00 | -2.87 | -1.20 | -2.44 | -0.81 | -1.15 | 0.23 | -1.09 | -4.60 | -2.77 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.00 | -0.62 | -1.16 | -1.69 | -1.91 | -0.81 | 0.17 | -0.79 | -4.79 | -2.31 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 547.10 | 329.65 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.81 | 2.81 | 4.20 | 3.40 | 5.65 | 3.30 | 4.99 | 2.97 | 3.07 | 3.66 | 2.94 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.81 | 2.81 | 4.20 | 3.39 | 5.59 | 3.18 | 4.99 | 2.97 | 2.81 | 3.66 | 2.94 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 3.27 | 2.71 | 4.76 | 1.89 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 2.48 | 3.21 | 2.56 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.42 | 1.08 | 0.99 | 1.79 | 1.02 | 1.10 | 1.50 | 1.69 | 1.79 | 1.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 459.88 | 793.92 | 188.85 | 14.96 | — | — | 1.54 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 16.30 | 18.06 | 15.95 | 10.32 | 72.64 | 12.07 | 13.71 | 10.94 | 14.49 | 12.26 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.1% | 4.0% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 10.8% | — | 2.1% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.4% | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.8% | 7.8% | 4.6% | 3.0% | 13.3% | 2.1% | 4.1% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.6% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 11.9% | 9.5% | 3.8% | 7.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.9% | 9.5% | 3.8% | 7.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $97M | $106M | $114M | $128M | $117M | $114M | $113M | $113M | $108M | $107M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CARG stock.
CarGurus, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 19.7x. The historical average is 77.8x. This places it at the 14th percentile of its historical range.
CarGurus, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 43.2x.
CarGurus, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 34.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 17.7%.
Based on historical data, CarGurus, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 19.7x. This is at the 14th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CarGurus, Inc. has 89.0% gross margin and 20.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
CarGurus, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Wholesale volatility and EPS uncertainty
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Wholesale Mix
Gross margin expanded to 92.1% in 2026Q2 from 87.3% a year earlier, per reported financials, while operating margin rebounded to 25.1% from a trough of 10.6% in 2025Q2, indicating a favorable mix shift toward the high-margin marketplace segment.
The sharp recovery in operating margin from the 2024Q2 trough of -42.8% suggests that the wholesale-related shock was largely transitory, but the sustainability of the 25.1% level depends on the continued dominance of the marketplace segment. Net margin of 19.6% in 2026Q2 is near the high end of the trailing ten-quarter range, yet the unreported EPS relative to consensus introduces uncertainty about cost discipline. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin expansion is purely mix-driven or if it also reflects improved pricing power in the marketplace.
ROIC Rebounding from Wholesale Shock
ROIC improved to 13.9% in 2026Q2 from a negative -14.9% in 2024Q2, as reported in financial statements, reflecting a strong recovery in operating efficiency and a shift away from capital-intensive wholesale operations.
The recovery in ROIC from the 2024Q2 trough is driven by both margin normalization and a reduction in invested capital, as total assets fell from $824.5M to $555.1M over the period. However, ROE of 19.6% in 2026Q2 is elevated relative to ROIC, indicating that financial leverage is amplifying returns, with D/E rising to 0.70. The sustainability of these returns hinges on the company's ability to maintain high margins without requiring significant incremental capital, which appears plausible given the asset-light model.
Negative CCC Reflects Float Advantage
The cash conversion cycle has remained consistently negative, at -77 days in 2025Q2 and -89 days in 2024Q4, per reported data, indicating that CarGurus collects cash from customers well before paying suppliers, a structural advantage of its subscription-based marketplace.
The negative CCC is primarily driven by a very low DSO of 16 days and a high DPO of 153 days in 2026Q2, which suggests that the company is effectively using supplier credit to fund its operations. This is a hallmark of a platform business with strong negotiating power over dealers, but the recent increase in DPO from 118 days in 2025Q4 to 153 days in 2026Q2 may indicate a deliberate extension of payment terms or a shift in wholesale-related payables. Asset turnover has improved to 0.47 in 2026Q2 from 0.24 in 2024Q1, reflecting better revenue generation per dollar of assets, though it remains low due to the capital-light nature of the business.
Leverage Creeping Higher as Cash Declines
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.70 in 2026Q2 from 0.34 in 2024Q1, while cash fell from $246.3M to $122.1M, as per financial statements, indicating increased reliance on debt to fund operations and buybacks, though interest coverage remains undefined.
The rising D/E ratio, combined with a shrinking cash balance, suggests that the company is becoming more leveraged, but the absolute level remains moderate and the asset-light model provides flexibility. The D/EBITDA ratio of 2.37 in 2026Q2 is manageable, but the absence of interest coverage data warrants caution, as it may indicate that interest expense is not material or that the company has minimal debt service obligations. The prior balance sheet analysis noted that the reported D/E may understate effective leverage when considering wholesale working capital needs, so investors should monitor the cash position and any potential refinancing needs.
Liquidity Buffer Thinning but Adequate
The current ratio declined to 1.85 in 2026Q2 from 4.20 in 2024Q4, as reported in financial statements, while quick ratio remains identical at 1.85, indicating a reduced but still sufficient cushion against short-term obligations.
The decline in the current ratio is largely due to a reduction in cash and an increase in current liabilities, likely related to wholesale operations. The quick ratio being equal to the current ratio suggests that inventory is not a significant component of current assets, which is consistent with the asset-light model. However, the thinning liquidity buffer, combined with rising leverage, suggests that the company would be more vulnerable to a severe downturn or a wholesale-related shock. The negative CCC provides some offset, as the company generates cash from operations quickly, but the trend warrants monitoring.
Misapplied P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 24.15 and forward P/E of 14.85, based on reported figures, may mislead investors because earnings are volatile due to wholesale segment swings, as evidenced by the -$0.66 EPS in 2024Q2 versus $0.54 in 2026Q2.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for CarGurus is the P/E multiple, as it fails to capture the cyclicality and one-time charges that have historically distorted net income. For instance, the 2024Q2 loss of -$93.6M in operating income was likely driven by wholesale-related charges, making the trailing P/E either artificially high or low depending on the period. A more appropriate valuation metric would be EV/EBITDA or EV/Sales, which are less sensitive to non-cash charges and better reflect the underlying cash-generating ability of the marketplace. Additionally, investors should normalize for stock-based compensation and focus on free cash flow yield, which at 12.52x P/FCF appears more attractive than the P/E suggests.