Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.6x · EV/EBITDA 19.1x · ROE 12.3%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.7B | $48.4B | $40.4B | $29.1B | $25.2B | $36.9B | $21.2B | $20.9B | $13.7B | $14.8B | $10.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $47.8B | $56.5B | $45.0B | $32.7B | $27.4B | $38.6B | $23.4B | $23.9B | $16.1B | $16.9B | $13.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.61 | 41.76 | 41.81 | 29.55 | 17.94 | 20.06 | 28.25 | 16.26 | 12.92 | 21.13 | 18.63 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.88 | 1.19 | 1.13 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 1.33 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.61 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.23 | 5.02 | 4.40 | 3.21 | 2.93 | 3.94 | 2.83 | 3.33 | 2.74 | 3.54 | 3.49 |
| P/FCF | 42.30 | 40.53 | 27.11 | 127.05 | 17.32 | 16.53 | 12.84 | 21.67 | 14.27 | 19.12 | 22.82 |
| P/OCF | 25.45 | 31.02 | 22.48 | 54.49 | 14.69 | 15.11 | 11.06 | 16.61 | 11.54 | 15.53 | 16.19 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.39 | 1.26 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 1.39 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.11 | 27.92 | 21.30 | 18.78 | 12.89 | 17.86 | 15.57 | 14.05 | 10.43 | 11.39 | 11.57 |
| EV / EBIT | 36.94 | 31.09 | 31.05 | 27.65 | 19.33 | 24.67 | 20.43 | 17.95 | 14.84 | 15.58 | 13.63 |
| EV / FCF | — | 47.35 | 30.18 | 142.60 | 18.81 | 17.32 | 14.17 | 24.78 | 16.68 | 21.91 | 29.33 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | 19.6% | 19.7% | 21.5% | 22.2% | 20.2% | 21.8% | 22.9% | 23.2% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 3.2% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 4.9% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 5.1% | 5.8% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.9% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 4.6% | 6.6% | 3.2% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.3% | 12.3% | 10.6% | 11.2% | 15.7% | 21.8% | 10.9% | 22.7% | 23.2% | 19.1% | 19.7% |
| ROA | 4.2% | 4.2% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 6.6% | 9.2% | 4.4% | 8.6% | 8.4% | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| ROIC | 6.2% | 6.2% | 8.0% | 7.2% | 10.4% | 11.8% | 7.7% | 11.4% | 11.9% | 13.0% | 9.6% |
| ROCE | 7.7% | 7.7% | 9.6% | 8.4% | 11.7% | 13.3% | 9.4% | 14.5% | 14.8% | 16.3% | 13.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 1.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.94 | 4.94 | 2.69 | 2.78 | 1.64 | 1.94 | 2.72 | 2.34 | 2.01 | 1.96 | 3.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.84 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.02 | 4.02 | 2.17 | 2.05 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 1.46 | 1.77 | 1.51 | 1.45 | 2.57 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.81 | 3.07 | 15.55 | 1.49 | 0.79 | 1.33 | 3.11 | 2.41 | 2.80 | 6.51 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.15 | 8.15 | 6.74 | 7.93 | 20.54 | 31.10 | 16.92 | 15.51 | 10.09 | 7.94 | 6.94 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 1.03 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 1.03 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.31 | 1.47 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 1.26 | 1.32 | 1.48 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.5% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 5.6% | 5.0% | 3.5% | 6.2% | 7.7% | 4.7% | 5.4% |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 2.5% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 5.8% | 6.0% | 7.8% | 4.6% | 7.0% | 5.2% | 4.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.4% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 7.3% | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.7% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 7.3% | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.7% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $301M | $308M | $313M | $328M | $340M | $338M | $341M | $343M | $341M | $338M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CBRE stock.
CBRE Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 28.6x. The historical average is 28.7x. This places it at the 71th percentile of its historical range.
CBRE Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 19.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.6x.
CBRE Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.3%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, CBRE Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 28.6x. This is at the 71th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CBRE Group, Inc. has 15.0% gross margin and 3.2% operating margin.
CBRE Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Services-model leverage and REIT misclassification
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Rich Services Multiple Against Cyclical Earnings
CBRE trades at roughly 32x trailing earnings and an EV/EBITDA of 21.5, a substantial premium to brokerage peer JLL at 18.3x P/E and 11.7x EBITDA, while reported P/FFO of 32.50 in 2026Q3 reflects depressed per-share FFO rather than a structurally expensive REIT valuation.
The current 32x P/E and 3.85x book multiple sit at the top of the real estate services peer set, and the implied valuation appears to be pricing in continued double-digit transaction-volume recovery rather than a stabilized earnings run rate. Because CBRE's per-share FFO is only $2.15 on a TTM basis against a $123 share price, the elevated P/FFO looks more like a signal that the market is paying for revenue scale and platform optionality than for contracted, rent-like cash flow. Investors should note that the Q1 and Q2 P/FFO prints in the 29-31 range suggest the multiple has been persistently high across the cycle, which narrows the room for multiple expansion if brokerage volumes decelerate.
Thin NOI Margins Marred by One Data Anomaly
Excluding the anomalous 93.7% NOI margin reported in 2025Q2, CBRE's quarterly NOI margin has held in a 15-21% band, while ROE between 1.4% and 5.2% across ten quarters indicates structurally modest returns on equity relative to the leverage deployed.
The 2025Q2 NOI margin figure of 93.7% is internally inconsistent with adjacent quarters and appears to reflect either a classification quirk or a non-recurring item rather than an operating inflection; without segment detail, it warrants further investigation before being used in trend analysis. Stripping that print out, the underlying NOI margin trend is roughly stable-to-slightly-improving, which is consistent with the prior finding that revenue growth is not being converted into structurally higher profitability. The wide swing in quarterly ROE — from 1.4% in 2024Q2 to 5.2% in 2024Q4 — mirrors the closing seasonality seen in the income statement data and suggests reported profitability is dominated by transaction timing rather than by pricing power or cost leverage.
Leverage Steepens as Debt Doubles
CBRE's debt-to-equity ratio has climbed from 0.62 in 2024Q4 to 1.10 in 2026Q3, based on the company's reported quarterly balance sheets, with total debt rising from approximately $5.7 billion to $10.5 billion while equity grew less than 4% over the same window.
The doubling of debt alongside essentially flat equity indicates that the balance sheet expansion has been liability-funded, which raises the company's fixed-cost burden even as interest coverage has improved to 10.85x in 2026Q3 from 6.25x in 2026Q2 — a swing that itself appears driven by quarterly earnings volatility rather than by a refinancing event. Given the pattern of first-quarter cash drawdowns and negative free cash flow in 2026Q1 and 2025Q1, revolver availability likely plays a material role in bridging seasonal working-capital gaps, so the maturity schedule and covenant headroom should be scrutinized in filings. At a debt-to-equity ratio above 1.0, CBRE is now levered more like a levered services platform than a conservatively financed real estate operator, a distinction that matters if transaction volumes contract.
Premium Valuation, Lagging Returns
Against Jones Lang LaSalle's 13.3% ROE and 8.9% ROIC, CBRE's sub-5% ROE and lower reported returns appear to lag materially even as CBRE commands a 32x P/E versus JLL's 18x, suggesting the market is pricing scale and diversification rather than superior capital efficiency.
CBRE's D/E of 1.10 also exceeds JLL's 0.44, meaning the premium valuation is being carried on a more levered balance sheet — an unusual combination that could compress if brokerage revenue cyclicality, previously flagged as the dominant risk, materializes. Relative to smaller peers like NMRK (16.9x P/E, 8.7% ROE) and CWK (31.1x P/E, 3.5% ROE), CBRE's metrics sit between the efficient smaller platforms and the highest-multiple distressed operator, which suggests the current price embeds an assumption of continued market-share gains that warrants monitoring. RMR's 10.4% dividend yield stands out, but CBRE's absence of a disclosed payout ratio or yield in the data means direct income comparison is not meaningful.
Misapplied P/FFO Obscures Operating Reality
The P/FFO ratio of 32.50 as of 2026Q3 is the metric most likely to mislead here, because CBRE's asset-light balance sheet has only $3.3 billion of property, plant and equipment against $31.3 billion of total assets, meaning FFO's depreciation add-back has little analytical value.
FFO was designed for capital-intensive property owners where depreciation is a large non-cash charge that overstates economic cost; for CBRE, roughly 11% of assets are PP&E, so the FFO metric adds back a distortion that barely exists, and the resulting P/FFO multiple is not comparable to a true REIT like a data-center or net-lease operator. Additionally, the FFO payout ratio is entirely blank across all ten quarters and the dividend yield is unavailable in the provided data, so the central REIT dividend-safety test cannot be applied and any inference about payout coverage would be unsupported. A more appropriate lens is EV/EBITDA of 21.5x alongside free cash flow margin, which has swung between -8.6% and 12.4% depending on quarter — an operating cash flow profile that looks nothing like contracted rent streams and reinforces that the REIT label applied to CBRE may distort standard ratio-based screening.