Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -21.7%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10M | $14M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $10M | $14M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -6.25 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.62 | 5.15 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.62 | 6.03 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.14 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 10.8% | 17.8% | 9.9% | 16.0% | 23.8% |
| Operating Margin | -62.2% | -62.2% | 14.6% | 7.5% | 14.5% | 22.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -63.2% | -63.2% | 12.0% | 6.3% | 12.2% | 19.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -21.7% | -21.7% | 37.8% | 41.5% | 78.7% | 94.6% |
| ROA | -18.4% | -18.4% | 30.9% | 32.4% | 49.6% | 44.2% |
| ROIC | -16.4% | -16.4% | 43.1% | 52.0% | 64.9% | 64.8% |
| ROCE | -21.4% | -21.4% | 45.7% | 49.8% | 93.4% | 107.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | 0.16 | 0.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.02 | — | 0.24 | 0.34 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.01 | -0.02 | -0.47 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -0.06 | -1.13 | 0.01 | 0.23 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.88 | 0.05 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 2120.00 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($23808) exceeds total debt ($2398)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 72.54 | 72.54 | 5.39 | 4.95 | 3.89 | 1.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 4.04 | 2.32 | 2.02 | 0.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.16 | 1.97 | 0.46 | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.15 | 2.18 | 4.41 | 3.44 | 2.24 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.05 | 1.05 | 7.62 | 7.88 | 6.03 | 3.14 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 107.53 | — | 0.23 | 16.65 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $26M | $20M | $24M | $24M | $24M |
Existential liquidity depletion risk
Based on reported figures, CGTL trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 3.50, which appears disconnected from the company's 92.38% revenue decline and suggests that the market may be mispricing the firm as a viable growth entity rather than a distressed asset with limited future prospects.
The negative P/E of -6.04 confirms that the company is currently unable to generate positive earnings, rendering traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant for assessing intrinsic value. Investors should monitor the P/B ratio of 4.47, which, given the rapid erosion of the asset base, may indicate that the market is overvaluing the company's remaining book value.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin has compressed to 8.3% in the most recent quarter, illustrating the extreme vulnerability of its arbitrage-based business model to input cost volatility and the inability to maintain pricing power in a competitive recycled electronics market.
The deeply negative operating margin of -62.22% suggests that fixed costs are entirely decoupled from the current, diminished revenue scale. This indicates that the firm's current cost structure is unsustainable, and without a radical pivot to higher-margin activities, profitability appears unlikely to recover in the near term.
According to quarterly data, the company's days inventory outstanding has reached 181 days, a significant increase from historical lows, which suggests that the firm is struggling to move its stock in a timely manner, thereby tying up critical liquidity in depreciating consumer electronics assets.
The deterioration in asset turnover to 0.49 highlights a fundamental breakdown in the company's logistical efficiency. This slowdown in inventory velocity directly exacerbates the firm's cash crunch, as capital remains trapped in unsold goods rather than being recycled into new, higher-margin procurement opportunities.
Based on recent SEC filings, CGTL's cash and equivalents have dwindled to a nominal $23,808, a level that appears insufficient to support the company's ongoing trading operations and leaves the firm with virtually no buffer against further supply chain disruptions or unexpected operational expenses.
While the current ratio of 72.54 may appear high, it is likely distorted by the composition of current assets, which may include illiquid or slow-moving inventory. The lack of cash reserves warrants significant concern, as the company appears to have lost the financial flexibility required to navigate its current distressed state.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-book ratio to CGTL, failing to recognize that the company's book value is largely comprised of potentially obsolete inventory rather than productive assets, which obscures the reality that the firm's true liquidation value is likely significantly lower than reported figures suggest.
Instead of relying on P/B, analysts should focus on the cash burn rate and the quality of current assets, specifically the recoverability of inventory. The reliance on book value in a business model that lacks proprietary technology or physical infrastructure provides a false sense of security regarding the company's underlying worth.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CGTL stock.
Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -6.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is -21.7%. The historical average is 46.2%.
Based on historical data, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -6.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares has 10.8% gross margin and -62.2% operating margin.