Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 33.7x · EV/EBITDA 20.1x · ROE 17.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.9B | $20.5B | $25.9B | $23.4B | $19.9B | $25.6B | $22.0B | $17.7B | $16.5B | $12.8B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $27.7B | $22.3B | $27.3B | $25.7B | $22.4B | $28.1B | $24.2B | $19.8B | $18.3B | $14.9B | $12.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 33.68 | 27.76 | 44.18 | 31.00 | 47.98 | 30.87 | 27.96 | 28.83 | 28.97 | 17.30 | 25.25 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.15 | 3.30 | 4.23 | 3.99 | 3.69 | 4.93 | 4.49 | 4.07 | 3.98 | 3.40 | 3.32 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.67 | 5.12 | 5.93 | 6.07 | 5.69 | 7.91 | 7.28 | 6.65 | 6.72 | 5.79 | 5.86 |
| P/FCF | 24.49 | 18.74 | 26.48 | 29.01 | 28.11 | 29.24 | 24.68 | 22.42 | 23.44 | 20.19 | 19.13 |
| P/OCF | 21.31 | 16.85 | 22.36 | 22.72 | 22.43 | 25.74 | 22.21 | 20.51 | 21.59 | 18.85 | 17.67 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.59 | 4.47 | 4.38 | 4.17 | 5.41 | 4.94 | 4.54 | 4.41 | 3.96 | 3.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.15 | 16.82 | 26.09 | 20.02 | 27.46 | 21.63 | 19.82 | 19.48 | 19.59 | 17.42 | 15.05 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.71 | 21.18 | 32.06 | 23.81 | 36.60 | 25.85 | 23.36 | 23.37 | 22.88 | 20.05 | 17.06 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.38 | 27.95 | 31.81 | 31.75 | 32.09 | 27.12 | 25.04 | 25.99 | 23.48 | 20.67 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 44.7% | 45.7% | 44.1% | 41.9% | 43.6% | 45.2% | 45.5% | 44.4% | 45.8% | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.4% | 17.4% | 13.2% | 18.0% | 11.1% | 20.8% | 21.0% | 19.3% | 19.1% | 19.4% | 20.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.9% | 11.9% | 9.6% | 12.9% | 7.7% | 15.9% | 16.1% | 14.1% | 13.7% | 19.7% | 13.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.6% | 17.6% | 14.2% | 20.6% | 12.3% | 26.5% | 27.6% | 24.1% | 24.3% | 35.4% | 22.9% |
| ROA | 8.3% | 8.3% | 6.7% | 8.9% | 5.1% | 10.7% | 11.2% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 14.3% | 10.7% |
| ROIC | 13.9% | 13.9% | 10.2% | 13.0% | 7.6% | 14.8% | 15.6% | 14.0% | 13.9% | 15.2% | 19.2% |
| ROCE | 14.4% | 14.4% | 11.0% | 14.8% | 9.1% | 18.1% | 17.8% | 16.3% | 16.1% | 17.4% | 21.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 0.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.66 | 1.66 | 2.30 | 2.03 | 3.49 | 2.11 | 1.93 | 2.19 | 2.26 | 2.77 | 1.35 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 0.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.38 | 1.76 | 3.15 | 1.92 | 1.78 | 2.03 | 1.92 | 2.44 | 1.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.64 | 1.48 | 2.80 | 3.65 | 2.85 | 2.44 | 2.61 | 2.55 | 3.29 | 1.54 |
| Interest Coverage | 11.05 | 11.05 | 8.96 | 9.72 | 6.84 | 19.93 | 16.96 | 11.51 | 10.06 | 14.17 | 26.48 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.70 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 1.07 | 0.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.24 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.72 | 0.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.80 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.41 | 6.41 | 5.41 | 5.35 | 4.83 | 5.47 | 5.41 | 5.69 | 6.02 | 6.19 | 7.37 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 34.92 | 35.91 | 32.77 | 28.65 | 28.52 | 29.73 | 29.85 | 30.40 | 33.43 | 29.99 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 39.0% | 39.0% | 47.3% | 35.3% | 61.6% | 29.9% | 30.2% | 36.4% | 37.5% | 25.6% | 39.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.0% | 3.6% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 3.2% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 5.8% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 4.3% | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.5% | 4.4% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.5% | 5.8% | 1.1% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 4.6% | 5.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $244M | $247M | $248M | $246M | $250M | $252M | $252M | $251M | $256M | $262M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHD stock.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 33.7x. The historical average is 25.1x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.1x.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.6%. The historical average is 19.2%.
Based on historical data, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. is trading at a P/E of 33.7x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.08% with a payout ratio of 39.0%.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. has 44.7% gross margin and 17.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity tightening under acquisition spend
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Priced for Platform Growth
Based on the supplied multiples, CHD trades at 36.86x trailing and 29.47x forward P/E and 21.26x EV/EBITDA, a premium to consumer staples peers that implies investors are paying for sustained acquisition-led growth rather than current organic expansion.
The trailing P/E of 36.86 sits well above Procter & Gamble's 25.24 and Kimberly-Clark's 18.20, and the forward P/E of 29.47 still embeds a meaningful premium. Because reported quarterly revenue growth has slowed toward low single digits, this multiple appears to assume that M&A integration and personal care mix shift will sustain earnings expansion. Investors should monitor whether forward EPS revisions keep pace with the multiple, since any further guidance trimming would compress the premium quickly.
Gross Margin Recovery Versus Volatile Net Earnings
As reported in financial statements, CHD's gross margin recovered to 46.8% in 2026Q3 from 43.0% in 2025Q2, yet net margin swung between 8.7% and 16.1% across recent quarters, indicating that discrete items heavily influence bottom-line earnings.
The gross margin improvement suggests a favorable shift in portfolio mix toward higher-margin personal care brands, which is a structural rather than purely price-driven gain. However, the spread between operating margin of 18.2% and net margin of 13.2% in the latest quarter, along with the 2024Q3 loss, suggests below-the-line items may be distorting reported earning power. Operating margin is likely the cleaner gauge of underlying profitability for this business mix.
ROIC Eroded by Goodwill-Heavy Asset Base
Based on the quarterly ratio series, CHD's ROIC has hovered between 3.1% and 4.1% over ten quarters, a modest return that appears to reflect the dilutive effect of a large acquired goodwill base on invested capital.
Returns on invested capital of roughly 3% to 4% are low for a company with 45% gross margins, implying that acquisition capital is earning returns below what the operating margin alone would suggest. ROE of 4.8% in 2026Q3 is similarly subdued and is depressed by the equity base expansion from retained earnings and goodwill. The trend suggests returns may be decaying relative to the company's earlier acquisition track record, warranting closer scrutiny of post-deal returns on incremental capital.
Tight Working Capital Cycle With Quarterly Swings
According to recent SEC filings, CHD's cash conversion cycle has held in a 16 to 30 day range, with the 2025Q2 peak of 29 days compressing to 16 days in 2026Q1, indicating working capital management has improved but remains timing-sensitive.
A consistently short cash conversion cycle supports the operating cash conversion observed in the cash flow data and reflects efficient inventory and receivables management. The compression from 29 days to 16 days appears driven largely by a lower DIO and stable DPO rather than receivables collection alone. Because DSO has remained near 16 to 18 days, the cycle is less exposed to customer leverage than to inventory timing, which may reverse if supply chain or retailer inventory policies shift.
Moderate Leverage Eroded by Shrinking Coverage
Based on EDBL's reported figures, CHD's debt-to-EBITDA rose from 6.10x in 2024Q2 to 9.49x in 2026Q2 while D/E held between 0.49 and 0.61, suggesting debt service capacity has tightened even as absolute leverage stayed moderate.
The D/E ratio stability masks a rising debt-to-EBITDA multiple, indicating that the earnings base supporting debt has narrowed relative to borrowings over the period. Interest coverage data is sparse, with several quarters unavailable, so conclusions on debt service comfort must be tentative. Investors should monitor whether leverage is funding further acquisitions, which would keep this ratio elevated.
Current Ratio Compression Signals Thinner Buffer
As reported in financial statements, CHD's current ratio fell from 1.95 in 2025Q1 to 0.96 in 2026Q3, and the quick ratio dropped from 1.43 to 0.62, indicating the near-term liquidity cushion has thinned materially.
A current ratio below 1.0 means current liabilities now exceed current assets, which for a consumer staples company with reliable cash flow is manageable but reduces flexibility. The decline in quick ratio, which excludes inventory, suggests the compression is not solely an inventory effect and reflects lower cash balances. Under a severe demand or cost shock, this thinner buffer would leave less room to absorb working capital or refinancing pressure without drawing on credit lines.
Peer Premium Hinges on Growth Durability
Based on the supplied peer table, CHD's 36.86x trailing P/E and 6.80x price-to-book stand well above Kimberly-Clark's 18.20x and Procter & Gamble's 25.24x, which may be justified only if acquired brands sustain the growth rate implied by the premium.
The strongest counter to the bearish read is that CHD's gross margin recovery and industry-leading organic growth, as cited by management, could support a sustained re-rating toward a higher-growth consumer platform. Investors should weigh whether the ROIC of roughly 3% to 4% is a temporary acquisition drag or a structural ceiling, since the answer determines whether the premium multiple is defensible. Monitoring post-acquisition returns and forward EPS revisions would clarify which interpretation the reported figures support.