Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.3x · EV/EBITDA 15.3x · ROE 37.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.0B | $20.4B | $21.2B | $18.1B | $15.9B | $15.6B | $18.9B | $16.9B | $16.4B | $17.3B | $14.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.2B | $20.6B | $20.7B | $17.5B | $15.7B | $15.4B | $18.6B | $16.6B | $16.1B | $17.0B | $14.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.25 | 19.29 | 25.03 | 21.52 | 19.99 | 19.17 | 22.30 | 20.43 | 19.93 | 21.50 | 20.21 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.14 | 7.48 | 8.25 | 7.49 | 6.84 | 7.21 | 9.14 | 8.46 | 8.54 | 9.31 | 8.41 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.23 | 7.08 | 7.59 | 6.41 | 5.44 | 4.80 | 5.44 | 4.73 | 4.34 | 4.80 | 4.19 |
| P/FCF | 11.59 | 16.89 | 20.59 | 17.74 | 14.81 | 13.16 | 16.53 | 15.65 | 14.53 | 15.97 | 15.82 |
| P/OCF | 11.34 | 16.52 | 20.12 | 17.42 | 14.51 | 12.98 | 16.26 | 15.28 | 14.31 | 15.56 | 15.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.55 | 8.07 | 7.27 | 6.76 | 7.09 | 9.02 | 8.32 | 8.38 | 9.18 | 8.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.34 | 22.26 | 21.57 | 18.54 | 17.10 | 16.37 | 19.99 | 18.32 | 17.18 | 18.09 | 16.67 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.05 | 21.76 | 21.25 | 17.94 | 16.93 | 16.10 | 20.59 | 18.82 | 16.37 | 17.53 | 16.95 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.03 | 20.13 | 17.21 | 14.63 | 12.93 | 16.31 | 15.39 | 14.26 | 15.75 | 15.62 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 86.7% | 86.7% | 87.6% | 88.3% | 86.9% | 88.1% | 89.0% | 89.2% | 89.5% | 88.5% | 88.4% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 30.5% | 34.2% | 37.2% | 38.0% | 41.9% | 43.8% | 44.2% | 47.7% | 49.8% | 48.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 38.8% | 38.8% | 33.0% | 34.8% | 34.2% | 37.6% | 41.0% | 41.4% | 42.9% | 43.3% | 41.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 37.3% | 37.3% | 30.1% | 29.2% | 25.8% | 24.3% | 24.1% | 22.5% | 22.3% | 22.6% | 20.6% |
| ROA | 15.6% | 15.6% | 14.8% | 14.7% | 13.7% | 13.9% | 14.6% | 14.2% | 14.5% | 15.0% | 14.1% |
| ROIC | 23.2% | 23.2% | 28.6% | 26.9% | 23.2% | 22.0% | 20.9% | 19.6% | 20.1% | 20.8% | 19.2% |
| ROCE | 17.2% | 17.2% | 23.1% | 23.5% | 21.9% | 21.4% | 20.9% | 19.9% | 20.9% | 22.2% | 21.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.13 | 2.13 | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | -0.17 | -0.19 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.08 | -0.07 | -0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.19 | 0.19 | -0.50 | -0.57 | -0.21 | -0.29 | -0.27 | -0.31 | -0.32 | -0.26 | -0.22 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.14 | -0.46 | -0.53 | -0.18 | -0.23 | -0.22 | -0.26 | -0.27 | -0.23 | -0.20 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 541.06 | 425.17 | 516.72 | 207.43 | 411.00 | 352.72 | 426.61 | 462.36 | 432.62 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.05 | 2.05 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.27 | 1.37 | 1.48 | 1.53 | 1.74 | 1.63 | 1.62 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.05 | 2.05 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.27 | 1.37 | 1.48 | 1.53 | 1.74 | 1.63 | 1.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.32 | 1.17 | 1.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 103.00 | 103.71 | 99.42 | 100.92 | 100.70 | 95.59 | 90.72 | 94.35 | 92.93 | 100.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.0% | 5.2% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 5.0% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 5.0% | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 8.6% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 7.6% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 6.9% | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 10.0% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 7.1% | 8.2% | 8.3% | 6.9% | 7.6% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.0% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 7.1% | 8.2% | 8.3% | 6.9% | 7.6% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $110M | $113M | $118M | $126M | $134M | $142M | $152M | $159M | $167M | $173M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHKP stock.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 14.3x. The historical average is 22.7x. This places it at the 7th percentile of its historical range.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.9x.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 37.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 26.0%.
Based on historical data, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 14.3x. This is at the 7th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. has 86.7% gross margin and 30.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Growth stagnation vs peers
Value Pricing Amidst Growth Discount
Trading at 13.3x trailing earnings versus PANW's 227x, CHKP's multiple implies the market prices it as a cash utility, not a growth compounder. According to recent filings, this gap may reflect skepticism about its cloud transition.
The P/E of 13.29 and forward P/E of 12.24 are at a steep discount to cybersecurity peers, suggesting the market assigns little value to potential reacceleration. EV/EBITDA of 14.31 is roughly one-third of FTNT's 51.68, indicating that investors are paying for current cash generation rather than future growth. This valuation appears to embed an assumption of continued low-single-digit revenue growth, which may be overly pessimistic given the Infinity transition and stable margins.
Margin Resilience Masks Operating Leverage Loss
Gross margin held at 85.2% in 2026Q2, but operating margin contracted from 36.1% in 2024Q4 to 27.5%, per financial statements. This suggests rising SG&A is absorbing revenue growth, warranting monitoring of cost discipline.
The 85% gross margin reflects the software-heavy model, yet the 860 basis point operating margin decline over six quarters indicates that incremental revenue is not flowing to the bottom line. SG&A growth outpacing revenue suggests deliberate investment in sales capacity to defend market share, which may be necessary but pressures near-term profitability. Net margin of 28.8% is flattered by interest income on the cash pile; stripping that out, core operating margin is closer to 27.5%, still robust but showing erosion.
ROIC Decay on Rising Capital Base
ROIC fell from 8.3% in 2024Q4 to 3.5% in 2026Q2, as reported in quarterly data, while the balance sheet expanded with $2B debt. This suggests new capital is not yet generating proportional returns, a key watch item.
The decline in ROIC is driven by a larger invested capital base—due to debt issuance and goodwill—without a commensurate increase in operating income. ROE remains high at 37.3% on a trailing basis, but this is partly a function of aggressive buybacks shrinking equity. The gap between ROIC and ROE highlights that leverage is amplifying returns to shareholders, but the underlying business is generating lower returns on incremental capital, which may indicate diminishing reinvestment opportunities.
Working Capital Leverage Distorts Cash Timing
DSO fluctuated between 59 and 80 days, while DPO swung from 189 to 513 days, per reported figures. This volatility suggests Check Point uses supplier terms to manage cash, but the negative CCC indicates strong bargaining power.
The negative cash conversion cycle, driven by extremely high DPO, implies that Check Point collects from customers well before paying suppliers, a sign of operational efficiency. However, the wide swings in DPO (from 189 to 513 days) are likely due to timing of large payments and may not reflect a stable trend. The current ratio of 1.67, while down from 2.05, remains adequate, but the recent cash drawdown to $596M warrants monitoring given the new debt load.
New Debt Shifts Balance Sheet Profile
D/E rose from near zero to 0.72 in 2026Q2, with D/EBITDA at 9.66, per balance sheet data. This marks a strategic shift for a historically debt-free company, increasing financial risk despite strong cash flow.
The $2.0B debt issuance appears to be funding buybacks and possibly M&A, but it introduces interest expense and refinancing risk. Interest coverage is not reported, but with operating income around $250M quarterly, coverage is likely comfortable, though the D/EBITDA of 9.66 is high for a software company. Investors should monitor whether the leverage is temporary or signals a new capital allocation philosophy under the new CEO.
Liquidity Buffer Compressed by Debt
Current ratio fell from 2.05 in 2025Q4 to 1.67 in 2026Q2, while cash dropped to $596M, as reported. This suggests reduced liquidity headroom, though the quick ratio of 1.67 indicates no inventory dependence.
The decline in cash and current ratio is largely due to debt-funded buybacks, which have consumed cash reserves. While the quick ratio remains above 1, the buffer is thinner than historical levels. In a stress scenario, the company could rely on its $2.0B debt capacity, but the new leverage reduces financial flexibility. The robust FCF margin of 23.9% in 2026Q2, though down from 65.2% in 2026Q1, suggests cash generation remains strong enough to service debt.
Misapplied P/E Ignores Cash and Buybacks
The trailing P/E of 13.29 understates value because it ignores the $1.8B cash pile and the impact of aggressive buybacks on share count. Based on reported figures, a better metric is EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which adjust for capital structure.
The P/E ratio is commonly used for CHKP, but it fails to account for the company's net cash position (now reduced but still significant) and the fact that buybacks have reduced share count by over 30% in the past decade. P/FCF of 10.81 is more telling, as it reflects the company's ability to generate cash independent of accounting earnings. Additionally, the high net margin is inflated by interest income, so investors should focus on operating margin and FCF yield to assess true earning power.