Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 3.1%. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $105M | $45M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $105M | $45M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.26 | 56.61 | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.62 | 0.60 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.1% | 3.1% | — |
| ROA | 3.0% | 3.0% | -85.0% |
| ROIC | -1.2% | -1.2% | — |
| ROCE | -1.6% | -1.6% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.8% | 3.9% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 1.8% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.8% | 3.9% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $9M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHPG stock.
ChampionsGate Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Share's current P/E ratio is 31.3x. The historical average is 56.6x.
ChampionsGate Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Share's return on equity (ROE) is 3.1%. The historical average is 3.1%.
Based on historical data, ChampionsGate Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Share is trading at a P/E of 31.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ChampionsGate Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Share's current dividend yield is 3.81%.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Shell company misclassified as bank
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Book Value Multiple Reflects Shell Status
Based on reported figures, CHPG trades at a P/B of 0.62 and a P/E of 58.50 at a $10.53 price, multiples that describe a trust-account shell rather than a bank franchise where P/TBV and ROTCE would normally anchor valuation.
A P/B of 0.62 would ordinarily signal the market doubting a bank's ability to earn its book value, but here the book is largely trust capital held in securities, so the discount may reflect redemption and liquidation expectations rather than franchise impairment. The 58.50 trailing P/E rests on quarterly net income of only a few hundred thousand dollars, making the multiple unstable and uninformative. Investors should monitor whether the entity's trust balance and distribution policy, rather than any bank-style return on tangible equity, drive the stock price.
ROE Built on Trust Interest, Not Lending
As reported in the financial statements, CHPG's ROE of 0.8% to 0.9% in recent quarters and ROA of 0.7% to 0.9% derive from interest on trust securities, with no net interest margin on a loan book underneath.
DuPont decomposition for a bank would split ROE into NIM, asset utilization, and leverage, but CHPG's 0.98 equity-to-assets ratio means leverage is essentially absent and returns mirror the yield on trust holdings. The earlier 2024 quarters show ROE of -3.5% and ROA deeply negative, indicating the earnings base has been unstable rather than improving. These figures suggest the returns reflect short-term trust yield rather than durable operating profitability.
NIM Metrics Lack a Lending Base
Based on reported figures, CHPG shows a NIM of 0.9% to 1.0% in recent quarters but an efficiency ratio that cannot be computed, since the supplied data carries no revenue denominator tied to a deposit franchise.
A NIM near 1% would be thin for a commercial bank, yet CHPG has no loan or deposit book to generate a spread, so the figure likely captures trust-account yield minus minimal funding cost. Efficiency ratio analysis requires operating revenue against non-interest expense, and the reported operating losses against near-zero revenue make that comparison meaningless here. Data for cost discipline and operating leverage is unavailable for this entity.
Equity Ratio Is Not Regulatory Capital
As reported in the balance sheet, CHPG's equity-to-assets ratio of 0.98 reflects near-total capitalization of a trust pool, and no CET1, Tier 1, or total risk-based capital ratios are present in the supplied data.
Regulatory capital ratios assess a depository institution's loss-absorbing capacity against risk-weighted assets, a framework that does not apply to a blank-check trust vehicle. The high equity ratio indicates the trust is almost entirely funded by shareholder capital rather than liabilities, which is a structural feature of SPACs rather than a bank capital position. Capacity for capital return should therefore be assessed against trust redemption terms, not regulatory minimums.
P/B Misapplied to a Trust Vehicle
The ratio most commonly misapplied here is P/B, which obscures that CHPG's book value is trust cash and securities subject to redemption, not a bank's tangible equity earning a return.
Applying P/B and ROTCE frameworks to CHPG implies a franchise valuation that the data does not support, since there are no loans, deposits, or net interest income from lending. A more appropriate alternative is to value the entity against its trust account per share and the probability and timing of a business combination or liquidation. Investors should monitor whether the distributions paid, which appear to exceed the earnings base, are funded by trust principal rather than operating income.