Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -277.4%. (2019–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $300M | $140M | $417M | $713M | $4.1B | $4.2B | $606M | $87M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $430M | $270M | $505M | $687M | $4.2B | $3.9B | $520M | $61M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.69 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 1.41 | 8.78 | 17.29 | 4.14 | 0.60 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 12.74 | 6.58 | 3.03 | 2.18 | 11.55 | 7.66 | — | 1.43 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.66 | 1.21 | 1.36 | 8.89 | 16.09 | 3.55 | 0.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 30.5% | 24.1% | 5.9% | 18.4% | 22.1% | 22.5% | 12.5% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | -51.1% | -60.7% | -88.8% | -73.0% | -109.9% | -82.6% | -91.6% | -114.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -53.5% | -53.5% | -66.4% | -90.3% | -73.6% | -54.7% | -134.5% | -93.0% | -117.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -277.4% | -277.4% | -119.1% | -133.9% | -76.3% | -48.6% | -655.5% | -115.4% | -62.9% |
| ROA | -26.1% | -26.1% | -27.7% | -41.9% | -35.5% | -23.0% | -75.2% | -51.4% | -37.5% |
| ROIC | -83.8% | -83.8% | -72.1% | -95.1% | -77.1% | -234.7% | — | -560.7% | -10431.3% |
| ROCE | -41.6% | -41.6% | -36.7% | -57.4% | -46.5% | -63.1% | -78.2% | -72.6% | -46.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 12.75 | 12.75 | 2.27 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.05 | — | 0.76 | 0.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 6.08 | 0.64 | -0.08 | 0.15 | -0.53 | — | -0.43 | -1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -8.06 | -8.06 | -10.06 | -27.12 | -35.81 | -88.99 | -59.51 | -36.84 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.93 | 2.25 | 2.48 | 2.46 | 1.92 | 1.98 | 4.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.22 | 1.65 | 2.24 | 2.27 | 1.63 | 1.72 | 3.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.99 | 1.30 | 1.67 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 3.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.51 | 2.40 | 5.56 | 5.34 | 3.38 | 4.98 | 2.86 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.45 | 83.93 | 89.37 | 128.58 | 114.38 | 87.39 | 97.21 | 119.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.2% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $23M | $22M | $19M | $17M | $15M | $755838 | $444689 | $217126 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHPT stock.
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -277.4%. The historical average is -119.1%.
Based on historical data, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. has 30.5% gross margin and -51.1% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity compression amid negative margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Outpaced by Operating Drag
ChargePoint's gross margin expanded 1,430 basis points from a trough of 22.1% in 2025Q1 to 36.4% in 2027Q2, yet operating margin remained deeply negative at -31.0%, as reflected in recent quarterly statements, indicating cost structure has improved materially without approaching breakeven.
The gross margin trajectory appears consistent with fixed-cost absorption rather than pricing power, since COGS held near $74M while revenue climbed to $116.1M in 2027Q2, echoing the prior income statement finding of flat input costs. Even so, operating expenses of roughly $76.4M still exceed gross profit of $42.3M, so the -30.7% net margin remains the more honest read of current earning power until opex coverage of gross profit improves. Investors should treat the improvement as directionally encouraging but not yet evidence of a durable margin structure.
ROIC Deepens Negative Despite Margin Gains
According to recent SEC filings, CHPT's ROIC swung between -16.3% and -23.2% across the last ten quarters, while ROA held near -5%, meaning the asset base is generating negative spread over its cost of capital despite notable gross margin recovery.
ROE readings such as -148.8% in 2026Q4 are arithmetically unstable given the shrinking, now-negative equity base identified in the balance sheet work, which makes ROIC the more usable return metric here. The modest improvement from -23.2% in 2026Q4 to -21.0% in 2027Q2 appears margin-driven rather than efficiency-driven, since asset turnover only moved from 0.13 to 0.16 over the same span. On this evidence the company is not yet compounding returns; it is merely reducing the rate of value erosion.
Receivable Gains Offset Inventory Overhang
As reported in financial statements, CHPT's cash conversion cycle shortened from 246 to 206 days over ten quarters, driven primarily by DSO falling from 102 to 66 days, even as days inventory outstanding edged up to 239, tying up capital in stock.
The DSO compression suggests stronger collections or a shift toward more favorable channel terms, and it is the single largest contributor to the CCC improvement. However, DIO rising from 228 to 239 days means inventory remains the dominant working capital claim, so a 206-day cycle still implies cash is committed for roughly two quarters before recovery. Asset turnover of just 0.16 against a specialty-retail peer set that typically turns inventory far faster indicates the working capital profile is structurally demanding rather than temporarily displaced.
Rising Debt Base Meets Negative Coverage
Based on the latest quarterly data, CHPT's debt-to-equity ratio climbed from 1.08 to 12.75 between 2025Q1 and 2026Q4 while interest coverage sat at -129.10 in 2027Q2, reflecting an equity base shrinking beneath what appears to be a largely fixed debt load.
Coverage of -129.10x implies interest expense is being serviced from cash reserves rather than operating earnings, which narrows flexibility if losses persist and refinancing is required. The sharp rise in D/E appears, consistent with prior balance sheet analysis, to be driven more by equity erosion than by incremental borrowing, a distinction that matters because the debt amount itself may not be growing. D/E data is unavailable for the three most recent quarters, so the leverage trajectory beyond 2026Q4 cannot be confirmed from these figures and warrants further investigation.
Current Ratio Compresses to Thin Cover
Based on recent quarterly filings, CHPT's current ratio fell from 2.13 to 1.07 and quick ratio from 1.45 to 0.57 between 2025Q1 and 2027Q2, implying near-term obligations are now nearly covered by current assets alone, leaving little buffer.
The gap between the 1.07 current ratio and 0.57 quick ratio confirms that current assets are heavily inventory-weighted, consistent with the 239-day DIO, so a demand stumble could convert nominal coverage into a genuine squeeze. Under severe stress, the dependence on converting slow-moving stock into cash within the quarter looks like the key vulnerability rather than any single maturing liability. Combined with the cash decline to $95.3M noted in prior balance sheet work, the position appears adequate only if the revenue recovery observed in 2027 holds.
Book Multiple Misfires on Negative Equity
The 9.59x price-to-book multiple, per available market pricing data, is the ratio most likely misapplied to CHPT, since book equity has eroded toward negative territory, rendering the denominator unstable; enterprise-value-to-sales is a more informative lens for a company carrying $245.3M of debt.
A negative or near-negative book equity base makes P/B swing violently and carry no signal about operating value, so the 9.59x reading should not be interpreted as a growth premium. Adjusting the reported 0.55x P/S for the disclosed debt load gives a truer sense of what the market pays per revenue dollar for a loss-making charging network business. Analysts should instead anchor on EV/Sales alongside gross margin trajectory, since those two together capture whether revenue is being bought at improving unit economics, which is the actual open question for CHPT.