Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.4x · EV/EBITDA 13.3x · ROE 14.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.0B | $12.5B | $12.5B | $9.5B | $6.2B | $5.5B | $4.2B | $4.8B | $2.8B | $3.1B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $17.6B | $15.1B | $14.8B | $11.5B | $8.3B | $7.7B | $5.4B | $6.2B | $4.1B | $4.4B | $4.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.44 | 32.21 | 31.02 | 25.11 | 15.10 | 26.89 | 31.45 | 49.28 | 42.54 | 30.80 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.28 | 2.08 | 2.12 | 1.75 | 1.20 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.41 | 0.84 | 1.05 | 1.16 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.52 | 4.56 | 4.85 | 4.22 | 3.23 | 3.61 | 3.16 | 3.79 | 2.38 | 2.61 | 2.95 |
| P/FCF | 64.27 | 28.57 | 36.10 | 30.65 | 22.27 | 18.19 | 18.24 | 24.94 | 15.87 | 26.48 | 85.59 |
| P/OCF | 17.30 | 14.44 | 16.04 | 12.92 | 9.93 | 10.01 | 9.84 | 11.65 | 7.45 | 10.85 | 12.33 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.51 | 2.52 | 2.13 | 1.61 | 2.03 | 1.73 | 1.81 | 1.25 | 1.50 | 1.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.27 | 13.53 | 13.84 | 11.79 | 8.47 | 11.94 | 9.97 | 11.63 | 8.58 | 10.60 | 12.77 |
| EV / EBIT | 26.17 | 22.07 | 21.56 | 18.49 | 12.79 | 22.06 | 21.61 | 26.67 | 23.11 | 30.13 | 48.89 |
| EV / FCF | — | 34.55 | 42.91 | 37.26 | 29.80 | 25.68 | 23.36 | 31.95 | 23.56 | 37.67 | 121.57 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 29.5% | 31.0% | 30.7% | 31.4% | 31.4% | 32.0% | 30.0% | 30.1% | 30.0% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 12.3% | 9.1% | 8.0% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 4.3% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.8% | 7.0% | 8.0% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 3.4% | -1.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.7% | 14.7% | 16.7% | 18.1% | 24.0% | 14.2% | 10.3% | 8.0% | 5.6% | 8.9% | -3.7% |
| ROA | 5.2% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 6.0% | 7.0% | 4.2% | 3.3% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 2.7% | -1.1% |
| ROIC | 9.8% | 9.8% | 10.9% | 11.0% | 12.2% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| ROCE | 10.6% | 10.6% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 12.9% | 8.5% | 7.3% | 7.0% | 5.8% | 4.0% | 2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 1.35 | 1.78 | 1.27 | 1.36 | 1.34 | 1.37 | 1.52 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.08 | 3.08 | 2.84 | 2.55 | 2.64 | 4.18 | 3.14 | 3.25 | 3.27 | 3.92 | 4.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 1.48 | 0.89 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 1.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.20 | 2.09 | 2.14 | 3.48 | 2.18 | 2.55 | 2.80 | 3.15 | 3.78 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.99 | 6.81 | 6.61 | 7.53 | 7.48 | 5.12 | 7.00 | 7.68 | 11.19 | 35.99 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.06 | 4.06 | 4.45 | 5.18 | 5.79 | 4.38 | 3.28 | 2.79 | 2.12 | 1.67 | 1.10 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.21 | 1.98 | 1.99 | 1.88 | 2.40 | 1.95 | 2.00 | 2.29 | 2.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.86 | 1.66 | 1.68 | 1.61 | 2.05 | 1.65 | 1.66 | 1.94 | 1.81 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| Inventory Turnover | 11.43 | 11.43 | 10.57 | 11.44 | 10.90 | 10.41 | 9.70 | 11.12 | 11.56 | 11.72 | 10.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.93 | 72.97 | 73.62 | 75.71 | 85.14 | 77.46 | 74.99 | 73.19 | 70.01 | 70.53 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.5% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 4.0% | 6.6% | 3.7% | 3.2% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 3.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.6% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 3.3% | 4.5% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 4.0% | 6.3% | 3.8% | 1.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.7% | 2.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.8% | 0.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.7% | 2.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.8% | 0.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $53M | $54M | $54M | $54M | $55M | $56M | $56M | $56M | $57M | $58M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLH stock.
Clean Harbors, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 28.4x. The historical average is 27.9x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Clean Harbors, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.1x.
Clean Harbors, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.7%. The historical average is 3.3%.
Based on historical data, Clean Harbors, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 28.4x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Clean Harbors, Inc. has 29.5% gross margin and 11.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Clean Harbors, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Peak-cycle margin normalization risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Pricing In Sustained Recovery
Based on CLH's reported figures, the stock trades at 38.15x trailing earnings and 15.39x trailing EV/EBITDA, well above the 26.63x forward P/E, suggesting the market is capitalizing a sharp earnings recovery rather than current run-rate profitability.
The gap between trailing P/E of 38.15 and forward P/E of 26.63 implies consensus expects earnings to rise meaningfully, which is consistent with the recent operating income climb but still depends on margins holding above their historical band. A PEG of 1.55 indicates growth is being priced at a modest premium rather than an aggressive one. Investors should monitor whether forward estimates are revised down if quarterly gross margin reverts toward the low-20s seen in early 2026.
Peak Quarter Margins Obscure Earnings Volatility
As reported in quarterly statements, CLH's operating margin swung from 7.8% in 2025Q1 to 17.0% in 2026Q3 and net margin from 4.1% to 11.1%, a range too wide to anchor earnings power on any single quarter.
The latest quarter's 35.4% gross margin and 17.0% operating margin sit at the top of the ten-quarter range, which suggests cyclical or mix-driven strength rather than a demonstrated new floor. Net margin has tracked operating margin with a relatively consistent spread, implying limited non-operating drag, though the trailing ten-quarter average is a more defensible earnings-power anchor than the peak. Warrants further investigation into what share of recent gross margin expansion is recurring versus timing-related.
ROIC Recovering but Still Below Earlier Peaks
Based on reported ratios, CLH's ROIC improved from 1.7% in 2025Q1 to 4.2% in 2026Q3 while ROE rose from 2.3% to 6.9%, a recovery that remains modest in absolute terms against a rising asset base.
ROIC has trended up over the last two quarters but has not exceeded the roughly 3 to 4 percent range in prior periods, which suggests incremental acquired capital is not yet generating proportional returns. ROE's higher level relative to ROIC reflects leverage contributing to equity returns, meaning the equity-level improvement carries more financial risk than the operating-level improvement. The pattern appears to indicate returns are recovering from a trough rather than compounding.
Leverage Ratios Distorted by Irregular Debt Data
According to reported figures, CLH's debt-to-equity fell from 1.23 in 2024Q2 to 1.01 in 2026Q3, but the 0.09 reading in 2025Q3 and the swing in debt-to-EBITDA from 0.85 to over 13x make the leverage trend difficult to read with confidence.
Debt-to-EBITDA moved from roughly 9 to 13x across 2024 and early 2025 before collapsing to 0.85x in one quarter and returning to 7.14x, a pattern that suggests a data or reporting inconsistency rather than a true deleveraging event. Interest coverage similarly ranged from 2.6x to 13.6x, which indicates debt service comfort has varied sharply. Investors should treat the leverage history as unreliable until the underlying debt balances are reconciled.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthening Steadily
Based on CLH's reported quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle expanded from 64 days in 2024Q2 to 72 days in 2025Q3 before settling at 62 days in 2026Q3, with DSO holding near 73 to 80 days throughout.
Receivable collection remains slow at roughly 73 to 80 days, which suggests customer leverage is structurally embedded in the business model. The swing in the cycle is driven more by inventory and payables movements than receivables, implying working capital efficiency is sensitive to timing. Asset turnover of 0.19 to 0.23 quarterly is consistent with a capital-intensive waste services model rather than a deterioration signal.
Peer Multiples Mask Structural Margin Gap
Based on the supplied peer data, CLH's 6.9% ROE and 4.2% ROIC trail CECO's 10.0% ROIC, while the 38.15x trailing P/E sits above CECO's 35.47x, suggesting the premium is not supported by superior current returns.
The most defensible challenge to the bullish reading is that CLH's trailing multiples appear to price in a recovery that peers have not yet demonstrated in their own returns. CECO's higher ROIC with a lower PEG of 0.83 implies the market is paying less per unit of growth for a business generating stronger returns on invested capital. This may indicate the premium is contingent on margin durability that the ten-quarter history does not yet confirm, and investors should monitor whether CLH's ROIC can close the gap to peer levels.