Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -57.8x · EV/EBITDA 22.7x · ROE -44.1%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $666775 | $44M | $342293 | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | $59M | $18M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -57.78 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 1.05 | 0.02 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 15.21 | 9.39 | 0.38 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 1.01 | 45.75 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.40 | 0.80 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.72 | 84.76 | 7.91 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 46.22 | 172.43 | 9.16 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 17.5% | 17.2% | 24.5% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 0.8% | 8.9% | 13.3% | 10.0% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.9% | -2.9% | -64.2% | 4.9% | -3.6% | -4.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -44.1% | -44.1% | -481.3% | 2.0% | -1.0% | -0.6% |
| ROA | -3.8% | -3.8% | -62.8% | 1.8% | -1.0% | -0.6% |
| ROIC | 1.3% | 1.3% | 9.8% | 3.7% | 2.0% | — |
| ROCE | 3.7% | 3.7% | 19.3% | 5.1% | 2.7% | 0.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.66 | 3.66 | 19.90 | 1.25 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 24.70 | 24.70 | 7.99 | 2.21 | 0.34 | 6.33 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.16 | 19.34 | 1.24 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 21.32 | 21.32 | 7.76 | 2.19 | 0.26 | 5.45 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.24 | 0.24 | 3.57 | 4.19 | 513.86 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.94 | 0.13 | 15.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.94 | 0.13 | 15.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 14.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.19 | 0.75 | 1.21 | 0.27 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2.0B | $20M | $19M | $12M | $12M |
Liquidity and operational volatility
According to recent market data, the company trades at a P/S ratio of 0.02 and a P/B of 15.51, suggesting that investors are pricing the entity based on its potential infrastructure footprint rather than current earnings, which remain negative as evidenced by the TTM P/E of -58.93.
The extreme divergence between the low P/S and high P/B multiples indicates that the market is heavily discounting the company's revenue-generating capacity while simultaneously assigning a premium to its asset base. This valuation profile is characteristic of a distressed turnaround or a post-SPAC entity where traditional earnings-based metrics fail to capture the underlying operational risks.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin of 8.30% and operating margin of 0.81% highlight a business model that is highly sensitive to input cost fluctuations, leaving virtually no buffer for the volatility inherent in the Australian agricultural sector's seasonal harvest cycles.
The razor-thin operating margin suggests that the company lacks the pricing power necessary to pass through commodity cost increases to its customers. Investors should monitor whether management can achieve economies of scale, as the current profitability profile appears insufficient to cover the fixed costs associated with the Cootamundra facility.
Based on the company's reported figures, the ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 4.5% in 2025Q4 but dipping into negative territory in prior periods, which suggests that the firm is struggling to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital in its current operational configuration.
The inconsistency in return on capital reflects the difficulty of maintaining high-margin, identity-preserved oilseed production in a commodity-driven market. The inability to consistently compound returns on invested capital warrants further investigation into whether the current asset base is being utilized at optimal capacity levels.
As indicated by the 2025Q4 current ratio of 0.35, the company's liquidity position appears increasingly precarious, with current assets failing to cover short-term liabilities, a trend that poses a significant risk to the firm's ability to fund seasonal inventory procurement without external financing.
The rapid decline in the current ratio from previous periods suggests that the company is consuming its liquid reserves at an unsustainable rate. This liquidity strain may force management to seek dilutive capital raises, which would further impact shareholder value given the already negative net margin environment.
Based on the provided data, the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the 85.37% revenue growth rate, which obscures the reality that such expansion is likely driven by commodity price pass-throughs rather than sustainable, volume-based demand for non-GMO oilseed products.
Analysts should prioritize the 'crush spread' and capacity utilization rates over top-line revenue growth to assess the true health of the business. Relying on revenue growth as a proxy for success in this context ignores the high variable cost structure and the potential for margin erosion during periods of commodity price volatility.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying COOTW stock.
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Warrant's current P/E ratio is -57.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Warrant's current EV/EBITDA is 22.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 46.3x.
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Warrant's return on equity (ROE) is -44.1%. The historical average is -105.0%.
Based on historical data, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Warrant is trading at a P/E of -57.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Warrant has 8.3% gross margin and 0.8% operating margin.
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Warrant's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 24.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.