Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 3.9%. (1993–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9M | $4M | $2M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $4M | $1M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.95 | 0.44 | 0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 14.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 30.9% | 28.8% | 30.6% | 24.5% | 23.6% | 23.7% | 22.6% | 22.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | 5.3% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 5.7% | 6.7% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | -0.2% | 3.3% | 1.0% | -0.8% | 0.1% | 1.6% | 5.0% | 1.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.9% | 3.9% | 1.0% | -0.3% | 5.8% | 1.7% | -1.6% | 0.2% | 3.0% | 9.3% | 2.9% |
| ROA | 3.7% | 3.7% | 0.5% | -0.2% | 3.2% | 0.9% | -0.8% | 0.1% | 1.8% | 6.0% | 1.9% |
| ROIC | -0.3% | -0.3% | -0.0% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 0.7% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 9.6% |
| ROCE | -0.4% | -0.4% | -0.1% | 5.1% | 6.0% | 3.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 8.7% | 10.5% | 12.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.83 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.64 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 4.93 | 3.42 | 2.75 | 3.58 | 8.08 | 1.56 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.00 | -0.00 | 0.70 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.35 | -0.04 | -0.14 | -0.14 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -8.99 | 4.15 | 2.92 | 1.27 | 2.74 | 4.47 | -0.27 | -0.91 | -0.84 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.50 | -0.47 | -1.16 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | 0.88 | 3.56 | 2.43 | 1.26 | 0.33 | 17.34 | 22.89 | 11.01 |
Net cash position: cash ($230540) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.10 | 5.10 | 12.25 | 1.30 | 1.37 | 2.03 | 1.65 | 1.50 | 2.24 | 2.83 | 2.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.10 | 5.10 | 12.25 | 1.30 | 1.37 | 2.03 | 1.65 | 1.50 | 2.24 | 2.83 | 2.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.90 | 3.90 | 11.14 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 1.11 | 0.97 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.23 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 16.9% | 59.7% | — | 419.9% | 31.7% | 9.3% | 32.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 229.4% | 172.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $23M | $21M | $31M | $31M | $27M | $27M | $27M | $27M | $27M | $27M |
Sponsor-led deal execution failure
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's P/E ratio of 1.15 appears to be a mathematical artifact of non-operating income rather than a reflection of fundamental value, as the entity remains a pre-revenue shell with no underlying operational earnings to support a traditional valuation multiple.
Investors should note that applying standard valuation multiples to this entity is largely futile given the absence of revenue and EBITDA. The current P/B ratio of 0.04 suggests the market is pricing the equity at a significant discount to its book value, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the sponsor's ability to execute a value-accretive merger.
According to the 2026Q1 balance sheet, the current ratio has compressed to 1.21 from a peak of 14.97 in 2024Q3, indicating that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations is deteriorating as the search for a viable acquisition target continues to consume the remaining cash reserves.
The rapid decline in the quick ratio suggests that the entity is becoming increasingly reliant on external sponsor support to maintain its public listing. This trend warrants close monitoring, as a further reduction in liquidity may force management to accept suboptimal deal terms to secure necessary capital.
Based on historical data, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, hovering around -0.1% in recent quarters, which underscores the structural inability of the shell vehicle to generate any return on invested capital prior to the successful consummation of a business combination with an operating entity.
The persistent negative return metrics highlight that capital is being deployed solely for administrative maintenance rather than value creation. Investors should interpret these figures as a reflection of the inherent cost of the search process, which provides no compounding benefit to shareholders until a target is secured.
As indicated by the provided financial data, the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the P/E ratio, which obscures the reality that the company generates no operational revenue and relies entirely on non-cash warrant liability adjustments to report bottom-line income.
Analysts should instead focus on the Net Asset Value (NAV) per share and the cash burn rate to assess the entity's true financial health. Relying on earnings-based multiples in a pre-merger shell company context is fundamentally flawed and may lead to a significant mispricing of the underlying risk.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CUBWW stock.
Lionheart Holdings's current P/E ratio is 0.9x. The historical average is 0.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Lionheart Holdings's return on equity (ROE) is 3.9%. The historical average is 7.2%.
Based on historical data, Lionheart Holdings is trading at a P/E of 0.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.