Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 30.8x · EV/EBITDA 22.6x · ROE 19.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.1B | $20.7B | $13.6B | $8.6B | $6.5B | $5.6B | $4.9B | $6.1B | $4.5B | $5.5B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $18.1B | $21.7B | $14.5B | $9.4B | $7.6B | $6.7B | $5.9B | $6.6B | $5.0B | $5.8B | $4.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 30.76 | 42.83 | 33.64 | 24.22 | 21.91 | 21.07 | 24.24 | 19.70 | 16.42 | 25.39 | 23.70 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.58 | 5.93 | 4.36 | 3.02 | 2.52 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 2.44 | 1.88 | 2.40 | 2.10 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.88 | 8.19 | 5.56 | 3.69 | 3.26 | 3.08 | 2.73 | 3.42 | 2.96 | 3.57 | 3.43 |
| P/FCF | 29.03 | 37.47 | 28.18 | 21.28 | 25.16 | 16.25 | 22.87 | 17.23 | 16.09 | 16.23 | 11.77 |
| P/OCF | 26.61 | 32.24 | 25.02 | 19.16 | 21.89 | 14.52 | 18.71 | 14.38 | 13.46 | 14.03 | 10.47 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.20 | 4.63 | 3.29 | 2.98 | 2.66 | 2.47 | 2.65 | 2.08 | 2.55 | 2.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.61 | 28.43 | 22.73 | 15.60 | 14.21 | 13.54 | 14.57 | 13.04 | 10.52 | 13.63 | 12.34 |
| EV / EBIT | 28.31 | 32.70 | 25.50 | 18.22 | 17.44 | 17.10 | 19.75 | 15.43 | 12.84 | 16.98 | 15.66 |
| EV / FCF | — | 39.17 | 29.92 | 23.23 | 29.65 | 19.20 | 27.60 | 18.77 | 17.82 | 17.24 | 12.87 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 37.2% | 37.0% | 37.5% | 37.3% | 37.1% | 35.2% | 36.1% | 36.1% | 36.0% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | 18.2% | 16.9% | 17.0% | 16.6% | 15.1% | 12.1% | 16.2% | 15.5% | 14.3% | 14.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.8% | 13.8% | 13.0% | 12.5% | 11.5% | 10.5% | 8.4% | 12.4% | 11.4% | 9.5% | 8.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.4% | 19.4% | 17.0% | 16.5% | 15.5% | 14.5% | 11.3% | 18.6% | 18.0% | 15.2% | 14.7% |
| ROA | 9.5% | 9.5% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 8.8% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 6.2% |
| ROIC | 14.1% | 14.1% | 12.4% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 10.0% | 8.5% | 14.0% | 14.4% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| ROCE | 16.6% | 16.6% | 13.7% | 13.3% | 12.4% | 11.5% | 9.3% | 14.5% | 14.3% | 13.0% | 12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.75 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.93 | 1.99 | 2.63 | 2.43 | 2.99 | 1.84 | 1.60 | 1.92 | 2.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.31 | 2.15 | 2.08 | 2.50 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 1.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.70 | 1.74 | 1.95 | 4.50 | 2.96 | 4.73 | 1.54 | 1.73 | 1.01 | 1.10 |
| Interest Coverage | 15.37 | 15.37 | 12.64 | 10.01 | 9.28 | 9.67 | 8.40 | 13.65 | 11.48 | 8.22 | 7.50 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 2.13 | 1.55 | 1.78 | 1.61 | 2.05 | 1.96 | 2.37 | 2.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.19 | 1.50 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 1.34 | 1.73 | 1.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.57 | 3.57 | 3.63 | 3.49 | 3.32 | 3.82 | 3.61 | 3.74 | 3.64 | 3.88 | 3.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 97.28 | 97.65 | 93.99 | 103.25 | 94.45 | 89.86 | 92.75 | 89.86 | 79.54 | 80.14 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.8% | 8.5% | 9.8% | 10.9% | 14.0% | 9.2% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 12.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.3% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 4.7% | 4.1% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 3.9% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 2.7% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 4.0% | 6.2% | 4.4% | 5.8% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 8.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 0.8% | 4.4% | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 6.6% | 4.7% | 1.3% | 5.0% | 1.4% | 2.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $38M | $38M | $39M | $39M | $41M | $42M | $43M | $44M | $45M | $45M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CW stock.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's current P/E ratio is 30.8x. The historical average is 19.3x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 22.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.2x.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 19.4%. The historical average is 13.3%.
Based on historical data, Curtiss-Wright Corporation is trading at a P/E of 30.8x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.20% with a payout ratio of 7.2%.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation has 37.2% gross margin and 18.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Premium valuation with thin margin for error
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Priced for Sustained Compounding
CW trades at 30.8x trailing earnings and 22.6x EV/EBITDA according to the supplied valuation snapshot, a premium that requires double-digit growth to persist as the forward P/E of 30.2x shows only modest compression.
The PEG of 1.41 suggests the market is paying a moderate premium for growth rather than an extreme one, yet the 6.88x price-to-book multiple indicates investors are valuing the franchise on earnings power rather than asset backing. Compared with the peer set, where HEICO trades at 55x and DRS at 25x, CW sits in the upper-middle of the range, which suggests the premium may reflect its nuclear-grade sole-source positioning and margin durability. Investors should monitor whether the reported Q3 EPS shortfall triggers a multiple reset, since the valuation leaves limited room for estimate misses.
Margin Expansion Anchored by Defense Mix
Gross margin rose from 36.3% in 2025Q1 to 39.0% in 2026Q3 and operating margin reached 19.7%, according to reported quarterly figures, a trajectory that points to mix-driven rather than cyclical improvement.
The roughly 270 basis point gross margin expansion over seven quarters appears consistent with a shift toward higher-value Naval and Power work rather than pricing alone, which may indicate more durable earnings power. Net margin of 14.6% in the latest quarter sits near the top of the ten-quarter range, suggesting operating gains are flowing through below the line. The gap between operating and net margin should be watched for signs of rising tax or financing drag as the business scales.
Returns Diluted by Goodwill-Heavy Asset Base
ROIC of 4.1% and ROE of 5.2% in 2026Q3, based on reported figures, sit well below the strong operating margins, suggesting acquired intangibles absorb much of the invested capital.
ROE and ROA have risen modestly from 4.0% and 2.0% in 2025Q1 to 5.2% and 2.6% today, which indicates gradual improvement but no sign of compounding at high rates. Because goodwill represents roughly a third of total assets, the low ROIC may reflect acquisition accounting as much as operating inefficiency, which warrants adjusting for intangibles before judging capital productivity. Investors should treat the trend as improving but still modest until returns on tangible capital are disclosed.
Low Leverage Stepping Up Modestly
Debt-to-equity of 0.45 and interest coverage of 18.2x in 2026Q3, according to reported figures, indicate comfortable debt service, though leverage has edged up from 0.42 earlier in the period.
Interest coverage has moved from 13.3x in 2025Q1 to 18.2x today, suggesting debt service is becoming more comfortable as earnings grow. Debt-to-EBITDA of 6.1x, however, is elevated relative to the low debt-to-equity figure, which may indicate the debt load is meaningful against cash earnings. Refinancing and covenant risk appear manageable on reported numbers, but the acquisition-driven debt build warrants monitoring alongside cash generation.
Working Capital Drag Could Undercut Ratio Quality
Cash conversion cycle of 162 days in 2026Q3, based on reported figures, sits well above the 145 days of 2025Q4, suggesting the strong margin profile may not be translating evenly into cash.
The most commonly misapplied metric for a percentage-of-completion defense contractor is net margin or ROE taken at face value, since estimate-at-completion adjustments and milestone billing can shift earnings ahead of cash realization. Here, the swing in free cash flow margin from -6.8% to 33.7% across the ten quarters suggests reported profitability may overstate the cash earning power in any single period. Investors should prioritize multi-quarter operating cash flow to net income and receivable trends over headline ratios before concluding the margin expansion is fully durable.