Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 42.4x · EV/EBITDA 27.6x · ROE 19.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20.1B | $20.7B | $13.6B | $8.6B | $6.5B | $5.6B | $4.9B | $6.1B | $4.5B | $5.5B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.1B | $21.7B | $14.5B | $9.4B | $7.6B | $6.7B | $5.9B | $6.6B | $5.0B | $5.8B | $4.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 42.36 | 42.83 | 33.64 | 24.22 | 21.91 | 21.07 | 24.24 | 19.70 | 16.42 | 25.39 | 23.70 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.76 | 5.93 | 4.36 | 3.02 | 2.52 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 2.44 | 1.88 | 2.40 | 2.10 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.10 | 8.19 | 5.56 | 3.69 | 3.26 | 3.08 | 2.73 | 3.42 | 2.96 | 3.57 | 3.43 |
| P/FCF | 36.37 | 37.47 | 28.18 | 21.28 | 25.16 | 16.25 | 22.87 | 17.23 | 16.09 | 16.23 | 11.77 |
| P/OCF | 31.30 | 32.24 | 25.02 | 19.16 | 21.89 | 14.52 | 18.71 | 14.38 | 13.46 | 14.03 | 10.47 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.20 | 4.63 | 3.29 | 2.98 | 2.66 | 2.47 | 2.65 | 2.08 | 2.55 | 2.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.64 | 28.43 | 22.73 | 15.60 | 14.21 | 13.54 | 14.57 | 13.04 | 10.52 | 13.63 | 12.34 |
| EV / EBIT | 33.04 | 32.70 | 25.50 | 18.22 | 17.44 | 17.10 | 19.75 | 15.43 | 12.84 | 16.98 | 15.66 |
| EV / FCF | — | 39.17 | 29.92 | 23.23 | 29.65 | 19.20 | 27.60 | 18.77 | 17.82 | 17.24 | 12.87 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 37.2% | 37.0% | 37.5% | 37.3% | 37.1% | 35.2% | 36.1% | 36.1% | 36.0% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | 18.2% | 16.9% | 17.0% | 16.6% | 15.1% | 12.1% | 16.2% | 15.5% | 14.3% | 14.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.8% | 13.8% | 13.0% | 12.5% | 11.5% | 10.5% | 8.4% | 12.4% | 11.4% | 9.5% | 8.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.4% | 19.4% | 17.0% | 16.5% | 15.5% | 14.5% | 11.3% | 18.6% | 18.0% | 15.2% | 14.7% |
| ROA | 9.5% | 9.5% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 8.8% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 6.2% |
| ROIC | 14.1% | 14.1% | 12.4% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 10.0% | 8.5% | 14.0% | 14.4% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| ROCE | 16.6% | 16.6% | 13.7% | 13.3% | 12.4% | 11.5% | 9.3% | 14.5% | 14.3% | 13.0% | 12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.75 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.93 | 1.99 | 2.63 | 2.43 | 2.99 | 1.84 | 1.60 | 1.92 | 2.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.31 | 2.15 | 2.08 | 2.50 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 1.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.70 | 1.74 | 1.95 | 4.50 | 2.96 | 4.73 | 1.54 | 1.73 | 1.01 | 1.10 |
| Interest Coverage | 15.37 | 15.37 | 12.64 | 10.01 | 9.28 | 9.67 | 8.40 | 13.65 | 11.48 | 8.22 | 7.50 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 2.13 | 1.55 | 1.78 | 1.61 | 2.05 | 1.96 | 2.37 | 2.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.19 | 1.50 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 1.34 | 1.73 | 1.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.57 | 3.57 | 3.63 | 3.49 | 3.32 | 3.82 | 3.61 | 3.74 | 3.64 | 3.88 | 3.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 97.28 | 97.65 | 93.99 | 103.25 | 94.45 | 89.86 | 92.75 | 89.86 | 79.54 | 80.14 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.8% | 8.5% | 9.8% | 10.9% | 14.0% | 9.2% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 12.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.4% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 4.7% | 4.1% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 3.9% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 2.7% | 2.7% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 4.0% | 6.2% | 4.4% | 5.8% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 8.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.3% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 0.8% | 4.4% | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 6.6% | 4.7% | 1.3% | 5.0% | 1.4% | 2.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $38M | $38M | $39M | $39M | $41M | $42M | $43M | $44M | $45M | $45M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CW stock.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's current P/E ratio is 42.4x. The historical average is 19.3x. This places it at the 97th percentile of its historical range.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 27.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.2x.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 19.4%. The historical average is 13.3%.
Based on historical data, Curtiss-Wright Corporation is trading at a P/E of 42.4x. This is at the 97th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.17% with a payout ratio of 7.2%.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation has 37.2% gross margin and 18.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Valuation premium and supply chain fragility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Reflects Mix Shift
Gross margin reached 39.4% in 2026Q2, up 220 bps year-over-year, while operating margin hit 19.3%, both record highs, as reported in the latest financial statements, signaling a favorable shift toward higher-margin proprietary electronics and nuclear components.
The sequential improvement from 36.3% gross margin in 2026Q1 to 39.4% in 2026Q2 suggests a step-change in product mix, likely driven by increased content in Naval & Power and Defense Electronics. Operating margin expansion from 17.6% to 19.3% in the same period indicates strong operating leverage, as fixed costs are absorbed over a growing revenue base. Net margin of 16.4% in 2026Q2 is the highest in the ten-quarter series, reinforcing that the company's earning power is improving, not just on a cyclical upswing but structurally, given the sole-source nature of its nuclear and defense contracts.
ROIC Trends Upward on Efficiency Gains
ROIC improved to 3.9% in 2026Q2 from 2.4% in 2024Q1, as per the quarterly ratio data, driven by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which remained flat at 0.17, indicating capital efficiency gains are coming from profitability, not asset utilization.
The steady climb in ROIC from 2.4% to 3.9% over ten quarters suggests the company is compounding returns on invested capital, albeit from a low base typical of asset-heavy defense manufacturers. The flat asset turnover of 0.17 implies that revenue growth is being matched by proportional asset growth, so the improvement in ROIC is entirely attributable to margin expansion. This is a positive signal because it indicates that management is extracting more profit from each dollar of invested capital without needing to increase leverage or asset intensity, which aligns with the fortress balance sheet.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Slightly
Cash conversion cycle extended to 159 days in 2026Q2 from 154 days a year earlier, as reported in the quarterly data, driven by a rise in DSO to 98 days and DIO to 106 days, while DPO remained stable at 46 days.
The slight lengthening of the CCC suggests that Curtiss-Wright is holding more inventory and taking longer to collect receivables, which may reflect deliberate inventory builds to mitigate supply chain risks in specialized semiconductors, as flagged in recent context. The DSO increase from 92 days in 2024Q2 to 98 days in 2026Q2 could indicate slower government payment cycles or a shift toward more complex contracts with milestone-based billing. While the working capital drag is modest, investors should monitor whether this trend persists, as it could pressure free cash flow conversion if not offset by operating income growth.
Leverage Declines to Fortress Levels
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.41 in 2026Q2 from 0.49 a year earlier, while interest coverage improved to 20.57 from 12.26, as per the balance sheet data, indicating a strengthening balance sheet with ample debt service capacity.
The reduction in D/E, combined with a stable total debt of $1.1B and rising equity, suggests that Curtiss-Wright is deleveraging through retained earnings rather than aggressive debt repayment. Interest coverage of 20.57 is exceptionally comfortable, implying that even a significant rise in interest rates would have minimal impact on earnings. The D/EBITDA ratio of 5.63 is moderate for an industrial, but given the low absolute debt and high coverage, the company appears well-positioned to fund future growth or shareholder returns without straining its balance sheet.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens with Cash Build
Current ratio improved to 1.60 in 2026Q2 from 1.44 in 2025Q4, while cash and equivalents rose to $477.1M, as reported in the balance sheet, indicating a solid liquidity position that can withstand working capital swings.
The quick ratio of 1.12 in 2026Q2, though lower than the current ratio, still indicates that Curtiss-Wright can cover its short-term obligations without relying on inventory liquidation. The improvement in liquidity ratios over the past year suggests that the company is building a cash buffer, which is prudent given the lumpy nature of defense contract payments and potential supply chain disruptions. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged government shutdown or a sharp economic downturn, the current ratio suggests the company could maintain operations for several months without external financing.
P/E Misapplied to Defense Contractor
The trailing P/E of 54.85, as per the valuation multiples, is misleading for Curtiss-Wright because it fails to account for the lumpy, project-based earnings typical of defense contractors, where EAC adjustments can distort quarterly net income.
Analysts often apply a standard P/E to defense firms, but for Curtiss-Wright, the percentage-of-completion accounting and potential catch-up adjustments make trailing earnings an unreliable gauge of sustainable earning power. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 35.42 still appears rich but better captures the company's cash-generating ability and is less distorted by non-cash items. Additionally, given the company's fortress balance sheet and robust FCF margin of 16.4%, a P/FCF multiple of 47.10 may be more indicative of value, but investors should adjust for the cyclicality of defense spending and the potential for supply chain disruptions to impact cash flow.