Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -55.6%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $3.4B | $5.8B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.9B | $4.2B | $5.6B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 244.53 | 915.13 | 1598.43 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.62 | 2.05 | 6.33 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 130.19 | 237.59 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 74.88 | 228.35 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1128.44 | 1555.05 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 292.96 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.5% | 54.5% | 82.9% | 96.0% | 96.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4611.4% | -4611.4% | -5140.9% | -386.5% | -1580.9% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -19335.8% | -19335.8% | -11077.3% | -1408.6% | 3435.8% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -55.6% | -55.6% | -94.7% | — | — | — |
| ROA | -37.7% | -37.7% | -85.1% | -797.1% | 331.4% | -307.0% |
| ROIC | -8.0% | -8.0% | -38.1% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -12.2% | -12.2% | -43.3% | — | -458.8% | -34.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.48 | -0.17 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 55.38 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -25.03 | -25.03 | -128.74 | -0.48 | 25.78 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 45.33 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 21.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 45.33 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 21.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.22 | 1.22 | 44.90 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 20.66 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 | 0.13 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 24.23 | 1.75 | 7.16 | 126.04 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.8% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.9% | 1.6% | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.9% | 1.6% | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $255M | $170M | $100M | $100M | $100M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DJT stock.
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -55.6%. The historical average is -75.1%.
Based on historical data, Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. has 54.5% gross margin and -4611.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Key-man dependency and monetization stall
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Collapse Signals Structural Shift
Gross margin swung from 87.9% in 2024Q1 to -41.9% in 2026Q2, per reported financials, indicating a fundamental change in cost structure or revenue mix that has yet to stabilize.
The dramatic deterioration in gross margin suggests that direct costs now exceed revenue, a condition that is unsustainable absent a significant revenue inflection. Operating margin, while improving from -56.8% to -28.0% in 2026Q2, still reflects a cost base roughly 27 times revenue, implying that even modest revenue growth cannot offset fixed overhead. Net margin is heavily distorted by non-operating items, as evidenced by the -142.5% figure in 2026Q2, so investors should focus on core operating cash flow rather than reported net income to gauge true earning power.
ROIC Decay Reflects Negative Compounding
ROIC has remained deeply negative, ranging from -109.4% in 2024Q2 to -2.5% in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, indicating that the company is destroying value on every dollar of invested capital.
The improvement in ROIC from -109.4% to -2.5% is misleading because it reflects a massive increase in invested capital from the SPAC merger rather than operational improvement. ROE has deteriorated from -4.6% to -20.9% over the same period, suggesting that equity is being eroded by persistent losses. The negative returns on capital indicate that the business is not compounding but rather decaying, with no clear path to positive returns given the stagnant revenue base.
Working Capital Distortions Mask True Burn
DSO spiked to 26,910 days in 2025Q4 and 33,593 days in 2025Q3, per reported balance sheet data, while DPO reached 1,326 days, indicating extreme volatility in receivables and payables that obscures underlying cash conversion.
The astronomical DSO figures are likely an artifact of minimal revenue and timing of collections, but they highlight the lack of a stable revenue stream. The negative CCC in most quarters suggests that the company is effectively using supplier financing, but this is not a sign of efficiency given the tiny revenue base. Asset turnover remains near zero, confirming that the company's asset base, including $120.9M in goodwill, is not generating meaningful sales.
Debt Spike Normalizes but Risk Persists
Total debt surged to $961.3M in 2026Q1 before falling to $8.4M in 2026Q2, per reported balance sheet data, with D/E spiking to 0.77 and then normalizing to 0.01, suggesting a temporary leverage event.
The sharp debt spike and subsequent paydown may indicate a short-term financing arrangement or a reclassification of liabilities, but the underlying issue is that interest coverage remains deeply negative, at -3.99 in 2026Q2. The company's cash position of $165.8M provides a cushion, but the lack of positive EBITDA means that any sustained debt would be unserviceable. Investors should monitor whether the debt spike recurs, as it could signal liquidity strain despite the low current D/E.
Liquidity Cushion Shrinks Rapidly
Current ratio collapsed from 132.6 in 2025Q2 to 0.96 in 2026Q2, per reported figures, indicating that current liabilities now exceed current assets, a stark reversal from prior quarters.
The dramatic decline in the current ratio reflects both a reduction in cash and an increase in current liabilities, likely from accrued expenses and deferred revenue. The quick ratio of 0.96 suggests that the company may struggle to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory, which is minimal. Despite the $165.8M cash reserve, the accelerating operating losses, with a TTM FCF margin of -18.9%, imply that the liquidity runway is shortening, and the company may need to raise capital or cut costs to avoid a liquidity crisis.
Misapplied P/S Multiple Obscures Reality
The P/S ratio of 606.16, based on TTM revenue of $3.68M, is commonly cited but misleading, as it implies a growth trajectory that the 1.76% YoY revenue growth does not support.
The market appears to be pricing DJT as a political asset rather than a traditional media company, making traditional valuation multiples like P/S or EV/EBITDA inappropriate. The most commonly misapplied ratio is P/S, which fails to account for the negative gross margins and the lack of a scalable revenue model. Instead, investors should focus on cash burn rate and the sustainability of the $165.8M cash reserve, as well as the potential for dilution from stock-based compensation, which totaled $157.0M over the last ten quarters. The valuation is likely to remain decoupled from fundamentals until the company demonstrates a credible path to monetization.