Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 59.7x · EV/EBITDA 42.3x · ROE 13.5%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $52.9B | $51.6B | $38.2B | $36.1B | $33.5B | $36.2B | $39.5B | $29.6B | $31.1B | $37.8B | $28.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $51.9B | $50.6B | $38.2B | $35.1B | $33.0B | $35.4B | $36.2B | $26.8B | $27.4B | $34.6B | $26.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 59.74 | 58.08 | 34.17 | 28.35 | 41.82 | 45.84 | 47.17 | 9.73 | 30.52 | 36.30 | 29.06 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.03 | 6.85 | 5.11 | 4.77 | 4.51 | 5.18 | 7.02 | 5.34 | 6.28 | 7.35 | 5.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.84 | 7.63 | 5.97 | 4.80 | 4.59 | 4.75 | 5.04 | 3.96 | 5.83 | 8.23 | 6.92 |
| P/FCF | 22.78 | 22.20 | 20.53 | 17.05 | 24.93 | 21.15 | 21.84 | 17.83 | 21.78 | 23.87 | 22.31 |
| P/OCF | 20.73 | 20.20 | 18.35 | 15.59 | 21.60 | 19.05 | 20.44 | 16.44 | 20.10 | 22.36 | 20.32 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.71 | 5.12 | 4.65 | 4.44 | 5.06 | 6.43 | 4.85 | 5.53 | 6.71 | 5.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.28 | 41.18 | 20.38 | 18.28 | 17.67 | 21.92 | 29.52 | 16.83 | 24.00 | 22.01 | 19.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 44.68 | 42.86 | 22.99 | 21.33 | 23.85 | 31.09 | 34.11 | 17.30 | 24.41 | 23.18 | 21.14 |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.77 | 20.58 | 16.60 | 24.58 | 20.69 | 20.01 | 16.20 | 19.18 | 21.80 | 21.06 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.0% | 79.0% | 79.3% | 77.4% | 75.9% | 73.4% | 73.5% | 75.3% | 73.3% | 75.2% | 73.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | 15.4% | 20.4% | 20.1% | 17.9% | 16.1% | 18.6% | 26.1% | 20.1% | 27.8% | 25.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.8% | 11.8% | 15.0% | 16.8% | 10.8% | 11.3% | 14.9% | 54.9% | 20.6% | 20.3% | 20.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.5% | 13.5% | 16.1% | 17.2% | 10.8% | 10.2% | 10.9% | 47.5% | 20.5% | 24.1% | 25.9% |
| ROA | 7.0% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 9.5% | 5.9% | 5.8% | 6.9% | 30.3% | 11.6% | 12.8% | 13.1% |
| ROIC | 14.3% | 14.3% | 17.5% | 17.0% | 14.6% | 14.9% | 16.9% | 34.0% | 50.7% | 56.4% | 40.4% |
| ROCE | 12.7% | 12.7% | 15.8% | 14.8% | 13.0% | 11.0% | 11.1% | 19.1% | 15.6% | 25.2% | 24.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.18 | 1.01 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 1.59 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.15 | 0.01 | -0.13 | -0.07 | -0.10 | -0.42 | -0.36 | -0.70 | -0.71 | -0.39 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.82 | -0.82 | 0.04 | -0.50 | -0.26 | -0.48 | -2.70 | -1.69 | -3.26 | -2.08 | -1.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.43 | 0.04 | -0.45 | -0.36 | -0.45 | -1.83 | -1.63 | -2.60 | -2.06 | -1.25 |
| Interest Coverage | 22.26 | 22.26 | 28.67 | 28.40 | 23.86 | 19.64 | 23.60 | 35.27 | 24.93 | 33.89 | 26.70 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.9B) exceeds total debt ($1.9B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 1.37 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 2.43 | 2.45 | 2.82 | 2.41 | 2.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 1.37 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 2.43 | 2.45 | 2.82 | 2.41 | 2.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 1.06 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.40 | 2.14 | 1.88 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.63 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.63 | 33.21 | 27.27 | 33.62 | 33.94 | 33.78 | 30.39 | 45.94 | 27.29 | 27.05 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 21.5% | 21.5% | 17.8% | 16.1% | 26.2% | 24.5% | 11.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 3.5% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 10.3% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 3.4% |
| FCF Yield | 4.4% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 5.9% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.5% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 1.8% | 4.1% | 3.8% | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 1.9% | 7.1% | 4.2% | 4.5% | 4.1% | 2.1% | 4.1% | 3.8% | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $253M | $264M | $272M | $278M | $286M | $292M | $295M | $306M | $312M | $314M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EA stock.
Electronic Arts Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 59.7x. The historical average is 40.3x. This places it at the 87th percentile of its historical range.
Electronic Arts Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 42.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.9x.
Electronic Arts Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.5%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, Electronic Arts Inc. is trading at a P/E of 59.7x. This is at the 87th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Electronic Arts Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.36% with a payout ratio of 21.5%.
Electronic Arts Inc. has 79.0% gross margin and 15.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Electronic Arts Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Apex monetization softness
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Signals Digital Shift
Gross margin expanded from 79.9% in 2024Q4 to 86.2% in 2027Q1, while operating margin jumped to 25.8%, reflecting cost discipline and digital distribution. According to the latest financial statements, this suggests a structurally higher earnings baseline.
The 620 basis point gross margin improvement over ten quarters aligns with the transition away from physical retail and toward direct digital sales, which carry near-zero marginal distribution costs. Operating margin more than doubled from 13.2% to 25.8% over the same period, driven by R&D and SG&A growing slower than gross profit, indicating strong operating leverage. However, the 2027Q1 net margin of 20.0% is flattered by a low base and one-time factors, so investors should monitor whether this level is sustainable as the company invests in upcoming titles like Battlefield and Skate.
ROIC Recovery Signals Efficiency Gains
ROIC improved from 2.6% in 2024Q4 to 6.4% in 2027Q1, while ROE rose from 2.4% to 5.7%, indicating a recovery from trough levels. Based on reported figures, this suggests improving capital efficiency despite a mature revenue base.
The sequential improvement in ROIC and ROE over the past three quarters reflects both margin expansion and a shrinking capital base, as total assets contracted from $13.5B to $12.6B. The low asset turnover of 0.15x is typical for a digital content company with significant goodwill, but the rising returns indicate that management is effectively leveraging its IP portfolio. The 2027Q1 ROIC of 6.4% remains below the cost of capital, but the trend suggests that if margins hold, returns could approach double digits, warranting a re-rating.
Working Capital Swings Mask Efficiency
DSO improved from 37 days in 2024Q4 to 26 days in 2027Q1, while DPO rose from 22 to 36 days, indicating better cash collection and supplier leverage. As reported in the financial data, the cash conversion cycle remains negative, reflecting a favorable working capital position.
The improvement in DSO and DPO suggests that EA is collecting cash faster from digital sales and stretching payments to suppliers, a common trait in asset-light software models. However, the cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the negative CCC implied by the DSO and DPO trends indicates that EA funds its operations with customer and supplier cash. The extreme quarterly swings in operating cash flow, from -$720M to +$1.5B, are driven by seasonal bookings and deferred revenue, so investors should focus on annual trends rather than quarterly noise.
Deleveraging Strengthens Balance Sheet
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.26 in 2024Q4 to 0.21 in 2027Q1, while interest coverage improved from 10.6x to 54.0x, indicating a fortress balance sheet. According to recent SEC filings, EA's minimal debt and $2.3B cash position provide ample financial flexibility.
Total debt declined from $2.3B to $1.5B over the period, while cash remained substantial, resulting in a net cash position. The interest coverage ratio of 54x in 2027Q1 is exceptionally high, suggesting that debt service is not a concern and that EA could easily fund M&A or increase shareholder returns. The low leverage is a strategic choice that limits financial risk but may also signal a lack of high-return investment opportunities, which is consistent with the company's focus on buybacks and dividends.
Liquidity Buffer Rebuilds After Seasonal Dip
The current ratio improved from 0.84 in 2026Q2 to 1.21 in 2027Q1, while cash stands at $2.3B against total debt of $1.5B. Based on the balance sheet data, this indicates a solid liquidity position, though it remains below the 1.45 peak seen in 2025Q1.
The current ratio dipped below 1.0 in fiscal 2026 due to seasonal working capital outflows, but has since recovered, reflecting the company's ability to manage its short-term obligations. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a digital distributor. Under a severe stress scenario, EA's substantial cash reserves and low debt would likely allow it to weather a downturn, but the reliance on deferred revenue as a liability means that a decline in bookings could pressure liquidity.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The trailing P/E of 59.7 is distorted by depressed earnings, while the forward P/E of 24.4 better reflects normalized profitability. As reported in the valuation data, the PEG ratio of 14.5 is meaningless given the low expected growth, so investors should use EV/EBITDA or P/FCF.
The trailing P/E is artificially high because TTM earnings include a period of weak margins, while the forward P/E of 24.4 is more representative of the current margin expansion. The PEG ratio of 14.5 is not useful because EA's growth is expected to be in the low single digits, making the metric misleading. Instead, EV/EBITDA of 42.3 (or 26.2 forward) and P/FCF of 22.8 provide a clearer picture of valuation relative to cash generation, but even these multiples are elevated, suggesting the market is pricing in a durable margin expansion that may not materialize if Apex Legends continues to soften.