Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -10.8%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $856M | $648M | $785M | $916M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $1.3B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $272M | $64M | $777M | $1.7B | $2.2B | $602M | $199M | $2.0B | $1.6B | $2.4B | $2.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | -6.67 | — | — | 9.11 | 10.04 | 10.57 | 10.10 | 11.63 | 11.02 | 19.83 | 21.31 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.86 | 2.17 | 2.54 | 2.94 | 3.97 | 5.12 | 3.64 | 4.76 | 4.94 | 6.34 | 7.30 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 1.15 | 1.38 | 1.08 | 1.40 | 1.51 | 2.09 | 2.47 |
| P/FCF | 41.22 | 31.20 | 6.36 | 4.68 | 7.33 | 8.01 | 10.27 | 12.81 | 10.23 | 12.81 | 19.04 |
| P/OCF | 30.03 | 22.73 | 6.34 | 4.68 | 7.25 | 7.83 | 10.04 | 12.54 | 10.14 | 12.35 | 17.83 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.21 | 2.52 | 5.42 | 6.30 | 1.65 | 0.54 | 5.69 | 4.76 | 7.76 | 7.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 12.91 | 11.63 | 2.47 | 1.10 | 9.80 | 7.65 | 12.62 | 12.12 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 13.26 | 11.84 | 2.53 | 1.13 | 10.11 | 7.91 | 13.09 | 12.59 |
| EV / FCF | — | 3.07 | 6.30 | 8.65 | 11.64 | 2.58 | 1.52 | 15.32 | 9.85 | 15.67 | 18.31 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | 3.2% | 34.5% | 43.4% | 79.1% | 95.5% | 73.5% | 73.9% | 79.6% | 86.1% | 87.6% |
| Operating Margin | -26.9% | -26.9% | -4.3% | 19.7% | 42.3% | 58.7% | 40.4% | 43.2% | 49.1% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -20.2% | -20.2% | -6.6% | 15.5% | 31.4% | 43.6% | 30.3% | 31.4% | 36.6% | 28.4% | 31.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.8% | -10.8% | -3.8% | 8.0% | 10.9% | 13.6% | 10.9% | 12.4% | 14.8% | 11.2% | 12.4% |
| ROA | -1.2% | -1.2% | -0.4% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| ROIC | -8.2% | -8.2% | -1.0% | 3.7% | 6.9% | 9.8% | 7.4% | 9.6% | 10.5% | 10.3% | 11.9% |
| ROCE | -2.8% | -2.8% | -2.1% | 8.8% | 12.8% | 15.1% | 11.4% | 13.7% | 15.7% | 16.0% | 16.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.51 | 1.17 | 0.90 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 0.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 11.40 | 5.75 | 1.76 | 3.44 | 2.60 | 1.17 | 3.21 | 1.73 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.51 | -0.01 | 0.61 | 0.68 | -0.94 | -0.92 | 0.27 | -0.06 | 0.47 | -0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 5.91 | 4.31 | -5.19 | -6.29 | 1.60 | -0.29 | 2.30 | -0.49 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -28.13 | -0.06 | 3.96 | 4.31 | -5.42 | -8.74 | 2.51 | -0.38 | 2.86 | -0.73 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.51 | -0.51 | -0.08 | 0.38 | 2.07 | 5.94 | 2.57 | 1.86 | 2.68 | 4.63 | 5.76 |
Net cash position: cash ($696M) exceeds total debt ($112M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 293.43 | 293.43 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 293.43 | 293.43 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 147.14 | 147.14 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.8% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 6.0% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 1.3% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 54.7% | 39.6% | 25.3% | 21.4% | 15.6% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 11.0% | 10.0% | 9.5% | 9.9% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 3.2% | 15.7% | 21.3% | 13.6% | 12.5% | 9.7% | 7.8% | 9.8% | 7.8% | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 0.0% | 4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 11.2% | 6.3% | 2.4% | 6.7% | 4.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $30M | $30M | $30M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EGBN stock.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -6.7x. The historical average is 15.4x.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -10.8%. The historical average is 8.1%.
Based on historical data, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -6.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.80%.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc. has 3.2% gross margin and -26.9% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated CRE credit costs
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Pricing Reflects Credit Skepticism
EGBN trades at 0.74x book versus peers above 1.3x, implying the market prices in sustained earnings weakness and unresolved asset quality concerns, according to recent valuation data.
The P/B discount is stark against NBTB at 1.39x and BWFG at 1.71x, suggesting investors assign a high probability to further credit losses or a prolonged earnings drag. The forward P/E of 17.75x, despite negative trailing earnings, indicates the market expects a normalization, but the lack of a PEG ratio and the negative P/E TTM underscore the uncertainty. This valuation gap may be justified if the 0.6% NIM persists, as it would cap return on tangible equity well below the cost of equity.
ROE Collapse Driven by Provision Shock
ROE swung from -6.9% in 2024Q2 to 0.6% in 2026Q2, with the 2025 credit shock of $253 million in provisions erasing profitability, as reported in quarterly financials.
The DuPont decomposition shows that the negative ROE in 2025 was not from margin compression alone—NIM held at 0.6%—but from a massive spike in credit costs that overwhelmed net interest income. The 2026Q2 ROE of 0.6% reflects a partial recovery, but the underlying asset utilization remains weak, with fee income contributing only 7.8% of revenue. The equity-to-assets ratio of 0.12 is thin, meaning any further provision shock would quickly push ROE back into negative territory.
NIM Trapped at 0.6% Signals Structural Spread Problem
Net interest margin has remained at 0.6% for ten consecutive quarters, far below the peer average, indicating a persistent funding cost or asset yield disadvantage, based on reported figures.
The efficiency ratio improved to 32.1% in 2026Q2 from 83.8% in 2024Q2, but this metric excludes provisions, which have been the dominant earnings driver. The stable NIM despite a shrinking balance sheet suggests that the bank is not benefiting from repricing, possibly due to elevated deposit costs in the competitive DMV market. This structural spread compression may persist if the bank continues to prioritize de-risking over growth, as the new CEO's commentary suggests.
Thin Capital Buffer Limits Flexibility
Equity-to-assets held at 0.12 in 2026Q2, down from 0.11 in 2025Q3, while retained losses have eroded tangible book value, according to the latest balance sheet data.
The equity base of $1.2 billion appears adequate for current asset levels, but the 2025 credit shock consumed significant capital, and the dividend was cut by 98% to preserve it. The low leverage ratio suggests limited capacity to absorb further losses without raising capital, which would be dilutive at the current 0.74x P/B. Investors should monitor whether the bank can rebuild capital through retained earnings, as the negative net margin in 2025 indicates that organic generation is strained.
Provision Volatility Masks Underlying Credit Trends
Loan loss provisions surged to $139.9 million in 2025Q2 before normalizing to $21.5 million in 2026Q2, suggesting elevated CRE credit risk that may not be fully resolved, as reported in quarterly filings.
The cumulative provisions of $253 million in 2025 indicate a significant deterioration in the loan book, likely concentrated in commercial real estate, which is a key risk given the D.C. office market's struggles. The 2026Q2 provision of $21.5 million is still elevated relative to the bank's earnings, implying that credit costs remain a drag on profitability. The lack of detailed NPL data in the provided figures warrants caution, as the true extent of the credit problem may be understated by the provision normalization.
P/E Misleads on Troubled Bank Earnings
The negative P/E TTM of -6.61 and forward P/E of 17.75 obscure the bank's true earnings power, as provision volatility makes trailing and forward earnings unreliable, based on reported figures.
For a bank with significant credit costs, P/E is the most misapplied multiple because provisions are non-recurring and can swing earnings from large losses to modest profits, as seen in 2025Q2 versus 2026Q2. The forward P/E of 17.75x assumes a normalized earnings level that may not materialize if credit costs persist or if the NIM remains at 0.6%. Instead, investors should focus on P/TBV and the sustainability of ROE, which better capture the bank's capital position and earning power through the cycle.