Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -193.3x · EV/EBITDA 33.4x · ROE -0.4%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $224M | $267M | $230M | $139M | $97M | $111M | $88M | $113M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $363M | $407M | $224M | $152M | $106M | $130M | $103M | $126M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -193.32 | — | 5.53 | 4.73 | — | 13.85 | — | 15.12 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.81 | 6.94 | 6.03 | 5.90 | 5.87 | 9.62 | — | 14.39 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.97 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 10.09 | 20.82 | 10.83 | 19.67 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 10.09 | 20.82 | 10.83 | 19.67 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.56 | 5.87 | 6.47 | 6.42 | 11.29 | — | 16.10 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 33.37 | 37.37 | 4.55 | 4.67 | 5.57 | 12.54 | — | 15.93 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 33.37 | 37.37 | 4.55 | 4.67 | — | — | — | 16.99 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 11.03 | 24.43 | 12.64 | 22.01 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 109.5% | 109.5% | 112.9% | 97.3% | 96.7% | 78.2% | 131.6% | 89.9% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | 28.3% | 129.1% | 72.4% | -80.7% | 60.2% | 117.8% | 95.4% | 400.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3.0% | -3.0% | 109.1% | 124.6% | -96.6% | 69.4% | 133.4% | 94.8% | -323.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.4% | -0.4% | 17.5% | 22.5% | -14.7% | 7.3% | -4.6% | 8.0% | -7.1% |
| ROA | -0.3% | -0.3% | 11.9% | 14.9% | -9.9% | 5.5% | -4.0% | 7.2% | -7.0% |
| ROIC | 2.1% | 2.1% | 15.0% | 9.0% | -8.1% | 4.1% | -2.7% | 5.6% | 6.6% |
| ROCE | 2.4% | 2.4% | 14.1% | 8.7% | -8.3% | 4.8% | -3.5% | 7.3% | 8.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.12 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 13.30 | 13.30 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 1.87 | — | 1.72 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.45 | -0.02 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.12 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 12.79 | 12.79 | -0.13 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 1.85 | — | 1.70 | -0.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 0.94 | 3.61 | 1.81 | 2.34 | -0.06 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.90 | 0.90 | 6.47 | 10.02 | -5.28 | -0.77 | -8.37 | 209.50 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.09 | 9.09 | 224.31 | 60.88 | 36.22 | 2.39 | 31.68 | 88.93 | 1.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.09 | 9.09 | 224.31 | 60.88 | 36.22 | 2.39 | 31.68 | 88.93 | 1.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.73 | 2.73 | 91.83 | 6.56 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.51 | 5.54 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.07 | -0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 19.2% | 16.1% | 14.9% | 13.0% | 12.5% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 4.8% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 82.6% | 61.7% | — | 88.0% | — | 73.2% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 18.1% | 21.1% | — | 7.2% | — | 6.6% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 9.9% | 4.8% | 9.2% | 5.1% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 44.5% | 37.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 63.7% | 53.4% | 14.9% | 13.0% | 12.5% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 4.8% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $23M | $15M | $10M | $7M | $7M | $6M | $6M | $5M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EIC stock.
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -193.3x. The historical average is 9.8x.
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 33.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.4x.
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -0.4%. The historical average is 3.6%.
Based on historical data, Eagle Point Income Company Inc. is trading at a P/E of -193.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.'s current dividend yield is 19.23%.
Eagle Point Income Company Inc. has 109.5% gross margin and 28.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 13.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Portfolio valuation volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Market Pricing Reflects Asset Volatility
According to recent market data, EIC trades at a P/B ratio of 0.75, suggesting that investors are pricing in a significant discount to NAV, likely due to the inherent volatility of the underlying mezzanine CLO debt portfolio compared to broader financial services peers.
The forward P/E of 7.39 implies that the market expects a recovery in earnings, yet the negative TTM P/E highlights the distortive impact of mark-to-market accounting on GAAP results. Investors should monitor whether this discount represents a structural mispricing of the mezzanine risk or a rational response to the potential for future credit spread widening.
Capital Efficiency Impaired by Mark-to-Market
Based on reported financial figures, EIC's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, dropping to -3.3% in 2026Q1 from a peak of 5.2% in 2024Q1, which indicates that the fund's ability to compound capital is currently hindered by unrealized valuation adjustments rather than operational failure.
The volatility in ROE and ROIC suggests that the fund's returns are highly sensitive to the macro environment affecting the leveraged loan market. Analysts should distinguish between the cash-on-cash yield generated by the CLO tranches and the accounting-driven returns that currently mask the underlying income-generating potential of the portfolio.
Working Capital Dynamics Remain Opaque
As reported in quarterly filings, EIC's asset turnover remains consistently low at approximately 0.03, reflecting the nature of a closed-end fund where the primary objective is income generation from a static or slowly rotating portfolio of CLO debt rather than high-velocity asset utilization.
The lack of traditional inventory or accounts receivable metrics makes standard efficiency ratios less relevant for this business model. Instead, investors should focus on the cash conversion cycle of the underlying CLO structures, specifically how quickly interest income is distributed versus retained to cover potential credit losses.
Conservative Leverage Supports Structural Stability
Based on recent financial statements, EIC maintains a disciplined debt-to-equity ratio of 0.53, which appears conservative relative to the broader BDC sector and suggests that the fund is not overly reliant on debt to amplify its exposure to the mezzanine CLO market.
The interest coverage ratio, which has seen periods of negative performance, warrants further investigation as it reflects the impact of non-cash valuation losses on the fund's ability to service its obligations. The current leverage profile appears adequate, provided that the underlying loan defaults do not trigger widespread overcollateralization test failures.
Misapplication of GAAP Net Income
Financial data indicates that the most commonly misapplied metric for EIC is GAAP Net Income, which obscures the fund's true earning power by including non-cash mark-to-market adjustments that do not reflect the actual cash flow generated by the underlying mezzanine CLO debt tranches.
Investors should prioritize Core Net Investment Income (NII) as a more accurate measure of distributable profit. Relying on GAAP net income may lead to an incorrect assessment of the fund's dividend sustainability, as it fails to account for the structural protections inherent in the CLO waterfall that shield cash flows from temporary market price volatility.