Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2020–2023 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $501713 | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.30 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 18.7% | 25.5% | 41.5% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | -8.4% | -8.4% | -9.9% | -30.0% | -8.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.0% | -6.0% | -5.5% | -26.6% | 5.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -21.7% | -21.7% | -15.3% | -22.9% | 2.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | -175.4% | -41.6% | -5.6% |
| ROCE | — | — | — | -68.1% | -7.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 165.69 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 159.52 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 14.22 |
| Interest Coverage | -11.76 | -11.76 | -18.12 | -56.13 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.62 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 4.48 | 3.02 | 1.68 | 0.51 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.94 | 12.37 | 14.10 | 109.39 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $479501 | $547686 | $547686 | $547686 |
Acute insolvency and liquidity
According to recent market data, EPWK trades at a P/S multiple of 0.02, a valuation level that suggests the market has largely abandoned expectations for future growth or profitability, viewing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a viable participant in the digital services sector.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are assigning negligible value to the company's revenue stream, likely due to the persistent negative operating margins and the lack of a clear path to scalability. This valuation suggests that the market is pricing in a high probability of terminal value erosion rather than a turnaround, as the current revenue base fails to generate any meaningful bottom-line contribution.
Based on reported financial statements, EPWK's gross margin has compressed to 16.4%, which, when compared to the 65.4% levels observed in 2021, indicates a fundamental deterioration in the company's ability to extract value from its service offerings while managing rising fulfillment costs.
The persistent negative operating margin of -9.3% highlights that the company's cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with its revenue-generating capacity. This suggests that the hybrid O2O model, which relies on high-fixed-cost physical infrastructure, is failing to achieve the economies of scale necessary to offset the administrative and selling expenses inherent in the SME services market.
As reported in historical filings, EPWK's ROIC has plummeted from 17.8% in 2021 to -92.1% in recent periods, a trend that underscores the company's inability to deploy capital effectively and suggests that every dollar invested is currently eroding shareholder value rather than compounding it.
The collapse in return on invested capital reflects the company's struggle to generate returns above its cost of capital, exacerbated by the heavy reliance on physical assets that do not contribute to high-margin digital growth. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot away from capital-intensive projects, as the current trajectory suggests a structural inability to generate positive returns on invested capital.
Data from recent financial statements reveals an asset turnover ratio of 1.78, which, when viewed alongside the company's inability to optimize its cash conversion cycle, suggests that EPWK is struggling to manage its receivables and operational throughput effectively in a cooling SME environment.
The low asset turnover indicates that the company's asset base is not being utilized efficiently to drive revenue, likely due to the drag of underutilized shared office space. The inability to improve these efficiency metrics suggests that the company's operational processes are not yet optimized for the scale required to compete with larger, more agile digital platforms.
According to the most recent quarterly data, EPWK maintains a current ratio of 0.17, a figure that highlights an extreme inability to cover short-term obligations with existing liquid assets, leaving the company with virtually no buffer against unexpected operational shocks or sudden creditor demands.
The precarious cash position of $227,826 relative to the company's ongoing operating losses suggests that the firm is operating on the brink of a liquidity crisis. This lack of liquidity warrants immediate investigation into the company's ability to secure external financing, as the current balance sheet provides no margin for error in managing its short-term liabilities.
Analysts frequently misapply the P/S ratio to EPWK, failing to recognize that the company's low gross margins and high fixed-cost structure render revenue-based valuation metrics misleading, as they ignore the underlying cash burn and the structural drag of the company's physical office assets.
Instead of relying on P/S multiples, investors should focus on the cash-to-burn ratio and the quality of earnings, as the current revenue figures are heavily inflated by low-margin service segments that do not contribute to long-term sustainability. The market's focus on top-line growth obscures the reality that the company's business model is currently consuming, rather than generating, economic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EPWK stock.
EPWK Holdings Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, EPWK Holdings Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EPWK Holdings Ltd. has 18.7% gross margin and -8.4% operating margin.