Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 29.4x · EV/EBITDA 10.5x · ROE -77.8%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $872M | $267M | $211M | $367M | $421M | $596M | $232M | $226M | $263M | $657M | $639M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.0B | $421M | $352M | $523M | $571M | $652M | $365M | $459M | $460M | $913M | $868M |
| P/E Ratio → | 29.43 | — | — | — | 22.86 | 20.55 | — | — | 22.38 | 3.74 | 31.82 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.11 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 1.23 | 1.30 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 2.47 |
| P/B Ratio | 15.57 | 4.82 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 2.32 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.88 | 3.48 |
| P/FCF | 17.99 | 75.99 | 3.19 | 7.66 | 6.25 | 10.03 | 4.27 | 57.11 | 19.28 | 2.56 | 13.25 |
| P/OCF | 81.85 | 25.08 | 2.83 | 4.87 | 5.34 | 9.13 | 3.65 | 7.16 | 7.78 | 2.18 | 11.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 0.86 | 1.06 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 3.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.50 | 32.69 | — | 346.31 | 10.14 | 7.86 | 15.28 | 30.63 | 9.22 | 3.10 | 13.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 1892.63 | — | — | — | 17.40 | 10.69 | 43.53 | 194.35 | 12.37 | 3.32 | 17.72 |
| EV / FCF | — | 119.87 | 5.32 | 10.93 | 8.46 | 10.96 | 6.73 | 116.09 | 33.71 | 3.55 | 17.99 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 21.1% | 34.7% | 35.9% | 44.5% | 23.3% | 38.4% | 42.9% | 42.8% | 69.4% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -14.2% | -8.9% | 9.4% | 8.0% | 1.9% | -0.6% | 11.3% | 51.9% | 18.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -17.5% | -17.5% | -40.8% | -5.2% | 5.6% | 3.9% | -1.1% | -7.2% | 4.1% | 32.9% | 7.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -77.8% | -77.8% | -72.2% | -5.6% | 6.7% | 10.3% | -1.3% | -6.3% | 3.6% | 66.2% | 11.6% |
| ROA | -17.9% | -17.9% | -22.0% | -1.8% | 2.1% | 3.7% | -0.6% | -2.9% | 1.7% | 27.5% | 3.9% |
| ROIC | 0.2% | 0.2% | -11.0% | -4.6% | 6.1% | 12.0% | 1.0% | -0.2% | 4.4% | 41.1% | 8.6% |
| ROCE | 0.2% | 0.2% | -10.2% | -4.3% | 4.9% | 9.8% | 1.1% | -0.3% | 5.0% | 46.9% | 10.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.85 | 3.85 | 1.62 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 1.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 16.58 | 16.58 | — | 173.70 | 4.62 | 2.90 | 10.57 | 17.77 | 4.89 | 1.00 | 4.52 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.78 | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.43 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 1.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 11.97 | 11.97 | — | 103.73 | 2.66 | 0.67 | 5.58 | 15.56 | 3.95 | 0.87 | 3.57 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 43.88 | 2.13 | 3.27 | 2.22 | 0.93 | 2.46 | 58.98 | 14.43 | 1.00 | 4.75 |
| Interest Coverage | -5.38 | -5.38 | -3.02 | -1.47 | 3.11 | 8.68 | 1.01 | 0.17 | 2.36 | 16.48 | 3.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 3.02 | 1.42 | 1.64 | 1.82 | 2.26 | 3.17 | 5.02 | 5.64 | 3.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 3.02 | 1.42 | 1.64 | 1.82 | 2.26 | 3.17 | 5.02 | 5.64 | 3.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 1.63 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 1.07 | 1.89 | 3.32 | 0.63 | 1.78 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.16 | 0.75 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.50 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 77.40 | 68.60 | 289.79 | 253.16 | 96.87 | 150.66 | 95.27 | 97.20 | 57.43 | 91.88 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 6.8% | 8.5% | 4.8% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 4.5% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 47.1% | 29.1% | — | — | 146.2% | 8.3% | 54.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.4% | — | — | — | 4.4% | 4.9% | — | — | 4.5% | 26.7% | 3.1% |
| FCF Yield | 5.6% | 1.3% | 31.4% | 13.1% | 16.0% | 10.0% | 23.4% | 1.8% | 5.2% | 39.1% | 7.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 5.6% | 5.3% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.1% | 6.8% | 9.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 1.4% | 4.8% | 13.1% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $91M | $90M | $88M | $88M | $88M | $84M | $86M | $90M | $92M | $91M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EVC stock.
Entravision Communications's current P/E ratio is 29.4x. The historical average is 20.1x. This places it at the 88th percentile of its historical range.
Entravision Communications's current EV/EBITDA is 10.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.0x.
Entravision Communications's return on equity (ROE) is -77.8%. The historical average is -27.4%.
Based on historical data, Entravision Communications is trading at a P/E of 29.4x. This is at the 88th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Entravision Communications's current dividend yield is 2.11%.
Entravision Communications has 21.1% gross margin and 0.1% operating margin.
Entravision Communications's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 16.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Digital margin sustainability and platform risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Digital Mix Compresses Thin Margins
TTM gross margin of 21.1% and operating margin of 0.12% reflect heavy digital reselling, per reported figures, while Q2 2026 gross margin spiked to 48.3% on political ad surge.
The sharp quarterly gross margin improvement to 48.3% in Q2 2026 from 24.0% in Q1 appears tied to high-margin political advertising, but the TTM figures reveal a structurally low-margin digital business. Operating margin of 0.12% on a TTM basis suggests fixed costs consume nearly all gross profit, leaving minimal buffer for operational missteps. The net margin of -17.5% TTM, despite a positive Q2, indicates impairments or non-operating charges continue to distort earnings quality.
ROIC Recovery Masks Equity Erosion
ROIC swung from -14.5% in 2025Q1 to 10.8% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, yet ROE remains -77.8% TTM, reflecting a shrinking equity base from cumulative losses.
The dramatic ROIC recovery to 10.8% in Q2 2026 appears driven by a surge in operating income and a reduced capital base, but this is a single-quarter snapshot. Over the past ten quarters, ROIC has been negative in most periods, indicating that the digital pivot has not yet consistently generated returns above the cost of capital. The -77.8% TTM ROE, despite the positive quarter, underscores that equity has been eroded by $115.4M in retained losses, making the return on equity metric less meaningful as a compounding indicator.
Working Capital Leverage Shifts Sharply
DSO improved to 52 days in 2026Q2 from 151 days in 2024Q2, while DPO swung from 253 to 103 days, per reported data, indicating a shift in supplier payment terms.
The dramatic improvement in DSO from 151 days in 2024Q2 to 52 days in 2026Q2 suggests a significant change in revenue mix toward digital, which likely has faster collection cycles. However, DPO also compressed from 253 to 103 days, meaning the company is paying suppliers more quickly, which reduces the cash conversion benefit. The absence of DIO data limits a full CCC calculation, but the working capital swings appear to be a major source of cash flow volatility, as seen in the prior cash flow analysis.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Shrinks
Debt-to-equity rose to 2.47 in 2026Q2 from 1.08 in 2024Q2, per balance sheet data, even as total debt fell, because equity contracted 62% over the period.
The rising D/E ratio, despite a reduction in absolute debt from $238.7M to $206.3M, indicates that the equity base is eroding faster than debt is being repaid. Interest coverage improved to 9.72 in Q2 2026 from negative levels in prior quarters, but this is largely due to the political ad surge; in off-years, coverage could revert to uncomfortable levels. The D/EBITDA of 6.15 in Q2 2026, while elevated, is distorted by the low TTM EBITDA; investors should monitor whether the company can sustain EBITDA growth to bring this multiple down.
Liquidity Cushion Thins Despite Cash Build
Current ratio fell to 1.48 in 2026Q2 from 3.04 in 2024Q2, per reported figures, while cash remained stable near $80M, indicating a shrinking buffer relative to short-term obligations.
The decline in the current ratio from 3.04 to 1.48 suggests that current liabilities have grown faster than current assets, likely due to increased digital pass-through payables. The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 1.48, implying no inventory dependence, which is consistent with a service-oriented digital business. Under a severe ad downturn, the liquidity position could tighten further, especially if political ad revenue disappears and digital margins remain thin.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Digital Model
EV/EBITDA of 76.33 TTM and 145.04 forward, per valuation data, is commonly misapplied to Entravision because EBITDA is depressed by digital pass-through costs, obscuring true cash generation.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is misleading for Entravision because the digital segment's high pass-through costs inflate revenue but compress EBITDA, making the multiple appear extreme. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Revenue or EV/OCF, which better captures the asset-light digital model's cash generation. The forward EV/EBITDA of 145.04 suggests the market expects EBITDA to decline further, but this may be overly pessimistic if the digital segment's take rate improves. Investors should adjust for the gross vs. net revenue reporting to assess the underlying profitability of the digital platform.