Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -21.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 10.1%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | $24M | $13.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | — | $-592047130 | $18.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -21.70 | 13.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | 0.00 | 3.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | 0.01 | 1697.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | 0.01 | 8.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.05 | 4.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | -0.11 | 20.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | -0.32 | 2366.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 80.4% | 27.0% | 64.8% | 71.3% | 33.1% | -8.7% | 4.3% | 11.7% | 15.1% | 2.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 20.4% | -19.0% | 40.4% | 33.0% | 31.8% | -14.5% | 0.4% | 8.5% | 12.6% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | -16.9% | 31.1% | 43.1% | 86.7% | -211.0% | -3.6% | 2.2% | 10.3% | -50.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.1% | 10.1% | -5.0% | 24.4% | 66.7% | 3835.2% | — | -9.4% | 25.6% | — | -735.3% |
| ROA | 6.5% | 6.5% | -3.3% | 15.8% | 36.9% | 71.9% | -85.5% | -2.1% | 1.8% | 7.4% | -28.9% |
| ROIC | 9.1% | 9.1% | -3.5% | 19.8% | 29.6% | 102.4% | -9.8% | 0.2% | 6.7% | 9.6% | -0.1% |
| ROCE | 9.9% | 9.9% | -4.2% | 23.6% | 35.0% | 38.6% | -7.7% | 0.3% | 8.8% | 11.8% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.41 | — | 2.16 | 3.62 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 6.21 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 2.32 | 4.03 | 2.85 | 4.66 | 9.58 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.03 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.25 | — | 2.16 | 3.62 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.11 | -0.11 | 5.78 | 0.21 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 1.99 | 4.03 | 2.85 | 4.66 | 8.77 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.33 | 669.50 | 1.74 | 1.30 | 1.32 | 76.50 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 10.71 | 10.71 | -5.78 | 31.06 | 23.82 | 75.07 | -28.51 | 0.02 | 1.34 | 3.25 | -15.05 |
Net cash position: cash ($616M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.64 | 1.99 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.64 | 1.99 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 1.36 | 0.08 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 48.14 | 106.02 | 27.84 | 45.87 | 55.74 | 59.01 | 42.28 | 44.07 | 53.11 | 44.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 42.1% | 42.1% | — | 20.1% | 24.6% | 1.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 7.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | 7677.6% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $240370 | $157M | $143M | $146M | $118M | $10M | $8M | $5M | $5M | $4M |
Commodity Price Basis Volatility
Based on recent market data, Expand Energy trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.88, which suggests that investors are currently discounting the company's asset base relative to its historical cost, likely reflecting lingering skepticism regarding the long-term earnings power of the newly consolidated natural gas portfolio.
The negative trailing P/E ratio of -21.70 indicates that recent accounting charges and merger-related costs have temporarily obscured the company's underlying earnings potential. Investors should monitor whether the 2.5% dividend yield provides a sufficient floor for the stock price while the market recalibrates its valuation following the Southwestern Energy integration.
According to reported financial statements, Expand Energy's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 6.4% in 2026Q1 after periods of negative returns, which highlights the difficulty of maintaining consistent capital compounding across a massive, geographically dispersed unconventional asset base following recent large-scale inorganic growth initiatives.
The improvement in ROIC suggests that management is beginning to realize operational synergies, yet the historical volatility warrants caution regarding the sustainability of these returns. The company's ability to generate value above its cost of capital remains highly sensitive to the regional basis differentials that define its Marcellus and Haynesville operations.
As reported in quarterly filings, Expand Energy's asset turnover ratio remains low at 0.15 in 2026Q1, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business where massive investments in drilling and midstream infrastructure are required to generate each dollar of revenue across the company's 5,000-well portfolio.
The variability in DSO, which ranged from 30 to 60 days over the last ten quarters, suggests that the company's cash conversion cycle is heavily influenced by the timing of gas deliveries and settlement of complex midstream contracts. This lack of consistency in working capital efficiency may indicate underlying challenges in managing the logistics of a post-merger entity.
Based on the most recent balance sheet data, Expand Energy has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio to a nominal 0.04 in 2026Q1, a significant improvement from previous periods that suggests a strategic shift toward a more conservative capital structure to mitigate interest rate and refinancing risks.
The interest coverage ratio of 25.95 in 2026Q1 indicates that the company is currently in a comfortable position to service its remaining debt obligations. However, investors should remain vigilant, as the company's reliance on fixed-cost midstream transportation agreements acts as a synthetic debt load that is not fully captured by traditional leverage ratios.
The price-to-earnings ratio is frequently misapplied to Expand Energy, as reported in industry research, because it fails to account for the massive non-cash impairment charges and derivative settlements that frequently distort net income in the unconventional oil and gas sector, obscuring the firm's true cash-generating capacity.
Analysts should instead prioritize FCF margins and EV/EBITDA metrics to better assess the company's operational performance and ability to fund shareholder returns. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to erroneous conclusions about the company's valuation, as it ignores the significant depreciation and depletion expenses inherent in the E&P business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EXEEL stock.
Expand Energy Corporation's current P/E ratio is -21.7x. The historical average is 13.2x.
Expand Energy Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.1%. The historical average is 0.8%.
Based on historical data, Expand Energy Corporation is trading at a P/E of -21.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Expand Energy Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.50% with a payout ratio of 42.1%.
Expand Energy Corporation has 80.4% gross margin and 20.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.