Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -166.0%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $879782 | $6M | $24M | $88M | $279M | $370M | $143M | $205M | $280M | $86M | $52M |
| Enterprise Value | $-7046712 | $-1914674 | $20M | $89M | $275M | $362M | $143M | $203M | $275M | $86M | $52M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.45 | 23.57 | 59.03 | 199.89 | 789.02 | 257.68 | 85.37 | 140.19 | 907.23 | 95.85 | 153.67 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.32 | 2.34 | 7.35 | 24.84 | 35.97 | 28.17 | 29.83 | 30.61 | 30.83 | — | 575.60 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -7.51 | 50.30 | 201.66 | 777.52 | 252.03 | 85.32 | 138.82 | 892.77 | 95.50 | 152.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -13.8% | -13.8% | 2.6% | 13.5% | 6.4% | 20.7% | 16.9% | 8.1% | 55.2% | 19.1% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1918.8% | -1918.8% | -1557.3% | -1124.0% | -1472.1% | -210.3% | -161.0% | -193.4% | -514.0% | -57.9% | -131.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1877.4% | -1877.4% | -803.8% | -1071.0% | -1393.3% | -224.5% | -151.1% | -217.4% | -657.1% | -69.7% | -130.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -166.0% | -166.0% | -94.9% | -83.5% | -47.2% | -35.9% | -44.1% | -40.3% | -45.0% | -7158.8% | -142.0% |
| ROA | -73.9% | -73.9% | -68.0% | -64.4% | -42.2% | -32.8% | -39.6% | -38.5% | -41.5% | -123.7% | -56.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | -229.8% | -92.6% | -89.6% | -46.5% | -43.2% | -45.6% | -56.2% | — | — |
| ROCE | -83.5% | -83.5% | -180.2% | -85.3% | -48.7% | -32.6% | -45.6% | -35.6% | -34.9% | -1046.9% | -142.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.03 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -3.08 | -1.09 | 0.22 | -0.52 | -0.62 | -0.02 | -0.30 | -0.49 | — | -3.77 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -31.79 | -121.88 | — | -84.65 | -609.91 | -1813.60 | -3.59 | -4.92 | -2300.64 |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($8464)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 23.60 | 23.60 | 4.39 | 0.62 | 3.47 | 16.12 | 1.91 | 5.64 | 22.13 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 23.32 | 23.32 | 4.24 | 0.45 | 3.39 | 16.08 | 1.83 | 5.49 | 21.80 | 0.89 | 0.89 |
| Cash Ratio | 21.71 | 21.71 | 4.12 | 0.28 | 3.21 | 15.19 | 1.11 | 5.06 | 21.02 | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 1.83 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.91 | 2.91 | 3.08 | 1.35 | 3.19 | 49.69 | 32.83 | 21.33 | 1.98 | 15.31 | 0.54 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.82 | 5.12 | 28.21 | 116.45 | 52.30 | 41.43 | 34.33 | 59.86 | 10.92 | 38.82 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 56.2% | 8.2% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 56.2% | 8.2% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $185550 | $167862 | $150787 | $163241 | $156435 | $153599 | $153561 | $141670 | $129644 | $129655 |
Capital depletion and dilution
Based on reported figures, FCUV trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 3.45, which appears disconnected from the company's 35.95% year-over-year revenue decline and the absence of a clear path to positive earnings, suggesting the market is pricing the stock as a speculative option on IP.
The current valuation reflects a significant premium relative to the company's inability to generate consistent top-line growth or positive margins. Investors should monitor whether this multiple compresses as the market reconciles the lack of commercial traction for the USIP platform with the company's persistent operational losses.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin has frequently dipped into negative territory, including a -69.1% reading in 2025Q4, indicating that the direct costs of production and service delivery currently exceed the revenue generated from these activities.
This negative gross margin profile suggests that the company's core business model is not yet economically viable at its current scale. The extreme operating margin of -1918.75% further highlights that the firm's fixed cost base is disproportionately large, necessitating a fundamental shift in strategy to achieve any semblance of earning power.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has exhibited extreme volatility, reaching 1398 days in 2025Q4, which underscores a profound inability to efficiently manage inventory and collect receivables relative to the company's limited sales volume.
The erratic nature of the CCC, coupled with an asset turnover ratio consistently near zero, suggests that capital is being trapped in unproductive inventory or slow-moving projects. This inefficiency warrants further investigation into whether the company's inventory of legacy horticultural products is becoming obsolete and requiring future write-downs.
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio improved to 13.36 in 2026Q1, yet this metric appears misleading as it reflects a massive influx of cash from equity issuance rather than an improvement in the underlying efficiency of working capital management.
While the cash position provides a temporary cushion, the company's reliance on external financing to maintain this liquidity is unsustainable. Investors should monitor the burn rate closely, as the current cash reserves are being depleted to fund operations that have yet to demonstrate a self-sustaining trajectory.
As indicated by the historical data, the current ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for FCUV, as it obscures the company's severe operational distress by inflating the liquidity profile with cash raised from dilutive equity offerings rather than from core business operations.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the ratio of operating cash flow to total assets to gauge true financial health. Relying on the current ratio provides a false sense of security that ignores the fundamental reality of a business that is consuming, rather than generating, capital.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FCUV stock.
Focus Universal Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Focus Universal Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -166.0%. The historical average is -78.5%.
Based on historical data, Focus Universal Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Focus Universal Inc. has -13.8% gross margin and -1918.8% operating margin.