Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -636.7%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3M | $4M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $85M | $87M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.80 | 7.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.19 | 0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 161.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -18239.9% | -18239.9% | -15489.8% | -5334.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -34032.1% | -34032.1% | -27128.8% | -35659.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -72891.0% | -72891.0% | -66019.9% | -55069.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -636.7% | -636.7% | -207.4% | -201.2% | -156.7% | -91.0% | — | — |
| ROA | -111.1% | -111.1% | -71.6% | -78.7% | -83.8% | -84.4% | -46.6% | -45.4% |
| ROIC | -92.0% | -92.0% | -38.1% | -67.5% | -129.6% | -259.7% | — | -646.8% |
| ROCE | -100.7% | -100.7% | -54.2% | -98.4% | -100.0% | -874.9% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 15.17 | 15.17 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.34 | 0.34 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 10.67 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.26 | -0.55 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -44.90 | -44.90 | -20.45 | -140.94 | -62.79 | -10.02 | -0.88 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 2.07 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 2.07 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 30.17 | 30.17 | 3.06 | 1.24 | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 408.58 | — | 3.26 | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $124M | $19M | $240869 | $38256 | $24312 | $16361 | $16360 |
Existential liquidity and insolvency
Based on reported figures, the company trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 4.80, which appears disconnected from its negligible revenue base and suggests that market participants are pricing the equity as a distressed option rather than a traditional automotive manufacturer with fundamental growth prospects.
The P/B ratio of 0.19 indicates that the market assigns almost no value to the company's tangible asset base, reflecting deep skepticism regarding the realizable value of its production facilities. This valuation profile suggests that investors are essentially ignoring standard earnings-based metrics in favor of monitoring the company's survival probability.
As reported in financial statements, the ROIC has remained consistently negative over the last ten quarters, reaching -23.6% in 2026Q1, which confirms that the company is failing to generate any meaningful return on the capital deployed into its manufacturing and research infrastructure.
The inability to achieve positive returns on capital suggests that the company's core business model is fundamentally inefficient at converting investment into productive output. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current asset base can ever be optimized to reach a break-even point.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has exhibited extreme volatility, oscillating between -290 and 6798 days, which highlights a profound inability to manage inventory and supplier relationships effectively within its current low-volume production environment.
The erratic nature of the CCC suggests that the company lacks the operational leverage to negotiate favorable payment terms with suppliers, forcing it to tie up scarce cash in inventory for extended periods. This inefficiency appears to be a structural barrier to achieving the scale necessary for commercial viability.
Based on the 2026Q1 data, the current ratio of 0.36 and a quick ratio of 0.34 indicate that the company lacks the liquid assets required to cover its short-term obligations, leaving it highly vulnerable to even minor disruptions in its external financing pipeline.
The reliance on external capital to fund basic operations is underscored by these liquidity ratios, which suggest that the firm is operating with virtually no margin for error. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure bridge financing, as the current liquidity position appears insufficient for sustained operations.
Analysts frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to this business model, as it obscures the reality that the company's revenue is not yet a product of repeatable commercial scale but rather a reflection of sporadic, low-volume deliveries that do not represent a sustainable market position.
Using P/S as a valuation anchor for a pre-revenue or early-stage manufacturer ignores the critical 'going concern' risks and the massive cash burn required to maintain operations. A more appropriate focus would be on the cash-to-burn ratio or the runway remaining before the next required capital raise.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FFAIW stock.
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -636.7%. The historical average is -164.1%.
Based on historical data, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. has -18239.9% gross margin and -34032.1% operating margin.